General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Vitamin E dangerous?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 8 posts · 260 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 November 2004
Last activity
15 November 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
260
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Consider the vit. e info at the linus pauling institute:

    http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/vitamins/vitaminE/index.html

    A click on "sources" lists foods and content, and gets in part:

    "Synthetic alpha-tocopherol, which is often found in food additives
    and nutritional supplements, is usually labeled
    all-rac-alpha-tocopherol or dl-alpha-tocopherol, meaning that all
    eight isomers of alpha-tocopherol are present in the mixture. Because
    half of the isomers of alpha-tocopherol present in
    all-rac-alpha-tocopherol are not usable by the body, synthetic
    alpha-tocopherol is less bioavailable and only half as potent."

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Just for info, are there Vitamin E supplements available out there
    that have a reasonable mix of the 8 different forms? Are there animal
    studies that have been done with the mixture? Any that are specific
    to diabetes?

    Adam Becker

    I have seen references in books to mixed Vitamin E supplements, but
    it's apparently a specialty item. You won't find it in a supermarket
    or drug store, nor in most chain supplement stores.

  2. Hi Mark:

    Quoted message said:

    Consider the vit. e info at the linus pauling institute:

    http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/vitamins/vitaminE/index.html

    A click on "sources" lists foods and content, and gets in part:

    "Synthetic alpha-tocopherol, which is often found in food additives
    and nutritional supplements, is usually labeled
    all-rac-alpha-tocopherol or dl-alpha-tocopherol, meaning that all
    eight isomers of alpha-tocopherol are present in the mixture. Because
    half of the isomers of alpha-tocopherol present in
    all-rac-alpha-tocopherol are not usable by the body, synthetic
    alpha-tocopherol is less bioavailable and only half as potent."


    The article on which so many news reports have been given is available
    in full.
    Meta-Analysis: High-Dosage Vitamin E Supplementation May Increase
    All-Cause Mortality
    http://www.annals.org/cgi/reprint/0000605-200501040-00110v1

    There are some links for response articles at the end.
    The site is real slow right now so I can't tell if they are
    accessible.

    Frank

  3. "Jefferson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi Mark:

    Quoted message said:

    Consider the vit. e info at the linus pauling institute:

    http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/vitamins/vitaminE/index.html

    A click on "sources" lists foods and content, and gets in part:

    "Synthetic alpha-tocopherol, which is often found in food additives
    and nutritional supplements, is usually labeled
    all-rac-alpha-tocopherol or dl-alpha-tocopherol, meaning that all
    eight isomers of alpha-tocopherol are present in the mixture. Because
    half of the isomers of alpha-tocopherol present in
    all-rac-alpha-tocopherol are not usable by the body, syntheticbstr
    alpha-tocopherol is less bioavailable and only half as potent."


    The article on which so many news reports have been given is available
    in full.
    Meta-Analysis: High-Dosage Vitamin E Supplementation May Increase
    All-Cause Mortality
    http://www.annals.org/cgi/reprint/0000605-200501040-00110v1

    There are some links for response articles at the end.
    The site is real slow right now so I can't tell if they are
    accessible.

    Yes they are. I downloaded the full articles available per the
    link at the end of the paper about 12 hours ago.
    I've not download the available abstracts yet.

    Quoted message said:

    Frank

  4. Jefferson said:

    The article on which so many news reports have been given is available
    in full.
    Meta-Analysis: High-Dosage Vitamin E Supplementation May Increase
    All-Cause Mortality
    http://www.annals.org/cgi/reprint/0000605-200501040-00110v1

    There are some links for response articles at the end. See


    http://www.annals.org/cgi/eletters/0000605-200501040-00110v1

    There is evidence that the alpha form displaces the gamma form of
    tocopherol in the body.

    A High Wire search for the terms Jiang+Q+Gamma-tocopherol resulted in 44
    finds - http://tinyurl.com/48cu4. A similar search without Jiang+Q
    results in 498 finds - http://tinyurl.com/3tkzk

    "{gamma}-Tocopherol ({gamma}T), the major form of vitamin E in U.S.
    diets, and its physiological metabolite 2, 7,
    8-trimethyl-2-(ß-carboxyethyl)-6-hydroxychroman ({gamma}-CEHC), in
    contrast to {alpha}-tocopherol ({alpha}T), the primary vitamin E in
    supplements, inhibit cyclooxygenase-catalyzed synthesis of prostaglandin
    E2 (PGE2) in activated macrophages and epithelial cells. ... These
    findings provide strong evidence that {gamma}T shows anti-inflammatory
    activities in vivo that may be important for human disease prevention
    and therapy." Source: {gamma}-Tocopherol, but not {alpha}-tocopherol,
    decreases proinflammatory eicosanoids and inflammation damage in rats
    http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/abstract/17/8/816

    "There is now a consensus that atherosclerosis represents a state of
    heightened oxidative stress characterized by lipid and protein oxidation
    in the vascular wall. The oxidative modification hypothesis of
    atherosclerosis predicts that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation is
    an early event in atherosclerosis and that oxidized LDL contributes to
    atherogenesis." Source: Role of Oxidative Modifications in
    Atherosclerosis -
    http://physrev.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/84/4/1381

    The early stages of atherosclerosis such as fatty streaks and complete
    encirclements of arteries as evidenced by autopsies of people in their
    late teens to early 20s suggests that lifestyle (diet and exercise) is
    a problem in a high proportion of people way before the clinical effects
    are realized in various degenerative diseases. Science is left wanting.

    Frank

  5. Jefferson <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    "Synthetic alpha-tocopherol, which is often found in food additives
    and nutritional supplements, is usually labeled
    all-rac-alpha-tocopherol or dl-alpha-tocopherol, meaning that all
    eight isomers of alpha-tocopherol are present in the mixture. Because
    half of the isomers of alpha-tocopherol present in
    all-rac-alpha-tocopherol are not usable by the body, synthetic
    alpha-tocopherol is less bioavailable and only half as potent."

    Something I don't understand here. WHY aren't all eight of the
    stereoisomers bio-available? When a substance has to activate a
    receptor, its stereo conformation is critically important. (assuming
    the receptor is chrial, but that's true of all our proteins.) But an
    antioxidant is just floating around in the plasma, waiting to bump
    into a free radical. And most of the free radicals are very small,
    non-chiral molecules. So I don't see why the optical conformation
    should have a major effect on its activity. I realize that when
    you've got more than one chiral carbon, some isomers will be more
    stearicly hindered than others. But that shouldn't be enough to
    completely lose the antioxidant activity, should it?

    Or is it just that the Vitamin E has to get transported to where it's
    needed and the transport mechanism is specific to a single
    stereoisomer? Just guessing.

    Meanwhile I'm realizing that I don't understand the
    quenching/regeneration cycle for vitamin E or for other antioxidants.
    E.g, I've seen the diagrams of alpha-tocopherol. But the 'business
    end' of the molecule isn't labled - what part of the structure reacts
    - and what's the product - when it runs into a superoxide molecule in
    a dark alley? And afterwords, how does it get regenerated?
    If somebody could point me to a web-based tutorial or FAQ - I'd be
    much obliged. My googling didn't get me there. I mean, I found lots
    of FAQs on antioxidants, but they didn't get down into the detailed
    chemistry. Probably reflecting that the Questions I'm posing are not
    at all Frequently Asked. :-)

    Adam Becker

  6. On 13 Nov 2004 21:55:37 -0800, [email hidden] (Adam Becker
    Sr) wrote:

    snip...>

    Quoted message said:

    Something I don't understand here. WHY aren't all eight of the
    stereoisomers bio-available? snip....

    Or is it just that the Vitamin E has to get transported to where it's
    needed and the transport mechanism is specific to a single
    stereoisomer? Just guessing.

    I think you're onto it here. Here's a partial explanation:
    http://www.jlr.org/cgi/content/full/39/8/1529

    Quoted message said:

    Meanwhile I'm realizing that I don't understand the
    quenching/regeneration cycle for vitamin E or for other antioxidants.
    E.g, I've seen the diagrams of alpha-tocopherol. But the 'business
    end' of the molecule isn't labled - what part of the structure reacts
    - and what's the product - when it runs into a superoxide molecule in
    a dark alley? And afterwords, how does it get regenerated?
    If somebody could point me to a web-based tutorial or FAQ - I'd be
    much obliged. My googling didn't get me there. I mean, I found lots
    of FAQs on antioxidants, but they didn't get down into the detailed
    chemistry. Probably reflecting that the Questions I'm posing are not
    at all Frequently Asked. :-)

    LOL. Probably not. But if you find anything interesting, do share it.

    George M. Carter

  7. On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:37:40 -0500, Jefferson <[email hidden]>
    posted:

    Quoted message said:

    The early stages of atherosclerosis such as fatty streaks and complete
    encirclements of arteries as evidenced by autopsies of people in their
    late teens to early 20s suggests that lifestyle (diet and exercise) is
    a problem in a high proportion of people way before the clinical effects
    are realized in various degenerative diseases. Science is left wanting.

    So "what" discovered these early changes, if it wasn't "science"??

  8. Dunne E. Dawe said:

    On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:37:40 -0500, Jefferson <[email hidden]>
    posted:

    Quoted message said:

    The early stages of atherosclerosis such as fatty streaks and complete
    encirclements of arteries as evidenced by autopsies of people in their
    late teens to early 20s suggests that lifestyle (diet and exercise) is
    a problem in a high proportion of people way before the clinical effects
    are realized in various degenerative diseases. Science is left wanting.

    So "what" discovered these early changes, if it wasn't "science"??

    The point is that there is still controversy in nutrition science and
    the autopsies are an after the fact situation rather than a preventive.
    Lack of nutrition knowledge is causing premature aging.

    To be more emphatic on the issue, particularly for atherosclerosis, in
    the report to the 72nd Scientific Sessions of the American Heart
    Association the following was mentioned:

    Dr. Nissen's group (Steven E. Nissen, MD, Cleveland, Ohio) evaluated 300
    transplant donor hearts that were harvested from young people who had
    died traumatically. These hearts were then analyzed with intravascular
    ultrasound to assess the degree of atherosclerotic heart disease. The
    results of this study showed coronary atherosclerotic disease in a large
    number of young people: 17% of patients less than 20 years of age, 60%
    of patients between 30 and 39 years of age, and 71% of patients between
    ages 40 and 49 had coronary artery disease. Dr. Nissen concluded that
    the patients who die of a plaque rupture when they are 45 years old
    probably have had the disease since they were teenagers. He called these
    results a 'wake-up call for America.'" (Source: 72nd Scientific Sessions
    of the American Heart Association, November 8, 1999, "Evaluation by
    Intravascular Ultrasound"😉.

    The finding about plaque during the Korean conflict wasn't much
    different than the above. Over 80% of men in their early 20s in which
    autopies were performed had signs of plaque deposits in the coronary
    arteries. So science was lagging some 45 plus years in finding a solution.

    Frank

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.