Carole wrote:
Psst! Carole, what used to be called aether is now called "dark matter".
Quoted message said:Peter Bowditch <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Jan, please tell us in your own words what Michelson was trying to
measure, the nature of his experiments, and why Einstein was wrong
when he supposedly proved that Michelson was looking for something
that did not exist.In the words of Roger Anderson who has written a book on the topic
From Article 2 - http://www.einsteinconspiracy.co.uk/
Abstract:
The physics that was taught in the 20th century was supposedly based
on Einstein. In fact this is not the case, there was a conspiracy
against Einstein and his theory was replaced by the physics
establishment in 1925/ 1926 by a false theory that is still called
Einstein’s theory. The conspiracy started before World war 2,
and was maintained after the war because of Cold War tensions of
wanting to keep atomic secrets from the Russians, and after that it
evolved into a doctrine that prevents certain experimental research
being carried out that can prove the 1925 theory as being wrong.http://www.einsteinconspiracy.co.uk/articlefour/a9.htm
2.7 Aether
If you read most any standard modern physics text book, then you find
that it says something like Einstein disproved the ether (aether),
when it talks about the Michelson Morley experiment.However if you look at the book: Sidelights on Relativity - Einstein
says he did not disprove the ether, just showed that one version of it
was wrong. [21] Einstein has been frequently misrepresented by the
physics establishment who want him to say what they want to believe,
such as a belief that the ether does not exist, and they then revise
their version of history accordingly.What Einstein actually did was refine what could be meant by the
‘ether’ concept. But the Physics Establishment have
redefined what Einstein meant by the words that he used, so that what
Einstein said could fit in with their preconceived beliefs. So, we now
have the situation today that physicists are taught that the
‘ether’ concept is nonsense, and we have another
‘ether’ concept being reinvented in Quantum Mechanics, but
renames it as : quantum fluctuations of the false vacuum, zero-point
energy, and other names.Really the "ether" concept evolved in General relativity and became
called "space-time." But that interpretation gets lost in confusion as
people try to think from Quantum Mechanics, and reinterpret General
relativity in the wrong way.There has been a great deal of revisions as to what Einstein actually
meant. It is one of the difficulties of science that when new abstract
ideas appear, the necessary words to describe those ideas are not
available. I have noticed in the context of Tesla that he was trying
to describe his experiments, with a lack of a big enough vocabulary,
and so was often using the same word in different sentences, but that
word could take on different meanings. Einstein was trying to be much
more precise with words that were available to him, but still his
scientist contemporaries decided to reinterpret. ‘They’
did not want to accept Einstein’s theory in its original form,
and altered it to suit their own tastes.Now consider the absence of barking dog:
It is obvious why the physics establishment revised Einstein’s
theory of physics. It is because they wanted to bring Einstein’s
theory in line with the 1925 theory, which Einstein rejected.The physics community proceeds in its enterprise by losing the
original meaning attached to theories by the theories’
originators. It then professes that the theories’ originators
are its heroes, and makes the claim of defending them. But what they
are really do is defending its reinterpretation of those heroes. The
people that it defends itself from can be people that have
rediscovered the original meaning of their hero, but these people are
labelled as cranks by some in the physics establishment, because they
are unaware that they have a myth as to what their hero actually said.There should be a clear record kept of how the physics community is
deviating from the original meanings of its heroes. Because everyone
is being left in a state of confusion as to what is real and what is
myth.The physics community wants the myth of their hero, and not the actual
history. This is not made clear anywhere.Where is it written that the physics community is no longer in
Einstein’s original theory of physics? Everyone acts as if it is
Einstein’s original theory. Everyone is taught that this is
Einstein’s original theory. They misquote Einstein to maintain
that belief. They never admit to it being revised.Now the clincher that points it out as being a conspiracy for me.
Sherlock Holmes pointed out in one case that the most significant clue
was the dog that did not bark, when a crime was being committed. There
is no ‘barking dog’ in this case, and that is most
peculiar. Einstein has been revised, and no one jumps up and down
saying I have proven Einstein wrong. No one gets the rewards and
public recognition for making the next major advance in physics after
Einstein. Einstein’s theory gets revised, but no one indicates
where are the experiments that have disproved Einstein’s
original theory. It can mean only one thing - ‘cover up.’Alarm bells should be going off. We have been denied a highly
significant theory from Einstein around 1927. We have been denied a
theory that is contrary to modern theory. We have had experiments
suppressed that can show modern theory to be wrong, because of
national security considerations. In short we have been denied the
ability to do proper scientific research. But I with by little stick
can knock over this ‘can of worms.’The conspiracy against Einstein has evolved into the conspiracy that
exists in science in the present day. It takes a great leap in
mind-set to realise that what we believed was Einstein’s theory
is not the original theory as which he was advocating, and that we
have been subjected to a very clever advertising campaign to accept a
revised theory as the original. Becker explains how the conspiracy in
science works in the present day: experimental research is suppressed
which has national security implications. This is easily achieved by
controlling the funding of research. If a scientist finds results that
do not agree with the orthodoxy he is subjected to ridicule. The
experts that the establishment want are essentially ‘yes
men’ who do as they are told and have lost their sense of
originality, if they had any, i.e. ‘dummies’. So, the
system that is set up in the public science research sector is anti-
"true scientific method" of free enterprise, and creates a deep
prejudicial atmosphere against anyone of true original ideas. In other
words it is an "anti- genius" atmosphere, which seeks to promote
people of lesser intellect, who then masquerade and pretend to be
clever.The restrictions placed on public sector science prevents that sector
from knowing what is the true theory of physics. As Professors Hawking
and Penrose have described it, the fact that General relativity and
Quantum Mechanics cannot be combined into a single theory, is a
scandal. [22] The reason why it cannot be joined, is because the
public science sector is refused permission to do experiments that
would lead to such a theory. What the Black Ops science sector is
involved in, who can say. (I suspect that ‘they’ have
succeeded in deluding themselves.)Every now and again, we hear of things like : ‘the speed of
light has shown to be exceeded’ by some experiment or other. But
when you check into these claims, you find that they are not in
general being made by the orthodox science community funded from the
public sector, but rather from maverick scientists with independent
funding. And these mavericks find that their claims are placed under a
long review by the orthodoxy, after which the orthodoxy then dismisses
the mavericks’ claims as being invalid. (Exactly the same
methodology as Dr. Becker describes the science conspiracy works
from.)W Macneile Dixon said:
Before you can examine things you must first become aware of them.
[23]We have not been aware of this ‘can of worms’. Physics has
dominated our rational thoughts, and many of our beliefs are centered
around it, such as a belief in temporocentrism. (See Box.) Physics
being wrong means that these beliefs such as temporocentrism are
delusions. For instance many of us believe that a theory that has been
rejected could not then turn out to be right. Our delusional
prejudices prevent many of us from seeing that much of our
‘common held beliefs’ are now wrong. We are as much in the
dark as medieval man when faced with the Copernican theory. If
Copernicus was correct, then nearly everything that medieval man
believed was therefore wrong. Medieval science had been building upon
one core central idea namely that the "earth was the centre of the
universe". If you said this idea was wrong, then all the ideas that
were developed from that idea were themselves wrong. It was too much a
shock for medieval man. Is it too much of a shock for 21st century man
to realise that the so-called rational scientific man of the 20th
century, has built everything upon one ‘core central idea’
that is wrong and hence lived a life of delusions?