General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Thorpe involved in doping case?

Started by Pat · · Last activity · 6 posts · 356 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
1 April 2007
Last activity
3 April 2007
Original author
Pat
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
356
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size

  1. Quoted message said:


    If you don't think that there is a HUGE probability that this guy was
    on some type of performance enhancing drugs (or WHATEVER it is that
    they take) you are verrry naive. Or you are in denial...

    MOST of these athletes are on some sort of performance enhancing
    materials. Track and field, bicycling, swimming...

    When will people stop talking about rule changes, changes in training,
    technology, strength conditioning, etc... as being the reason for these
    FREAKISH performances in the pool. There is NO WAY a human being can
    swim/perform that way naturally.

    No way.

    Then prove your point. Don't just make "no way" allegations and tell people
    they are "naive" or "in denial." Back up your assertions. In other words,
    step up to the plate and show your expertise, your facts, and your arguments
    are more than just blowing smoke. You remind me of the guy on the cycling
    newsgroup whose only "proof" was "I know I can't do it so nobody can!"

    We're waiting, big guy.

    Pat in TX

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, Pat <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    If you don't think that there is a HUGE probability that this guy was
    on some type of performance enhancing drugs (or WHATEVER it is that
    they take) you are verrry naive. Or you are in denial...

    MOST of these athletes are on some sort of performance enhancing
    materials. Track and field, bicycling, swimming...

    When will people stop talking about rule changes, changes in training,
    technology, strength conditioning, etc... as being the reason for these
    FREAKISH performances in the pool. There is NO WAY a human being can
    swim/perform that way naturally.

    No way.

    Then prove your point. Don't just make "no way" allegations and tell people
    they are "naive" or "in denial." Back up your assertions. In other words,
    step up to the plate and show your expertise, your facts, and your arguments
    are more than just blowing smoke. You remind me of the guy on the cycling
    newsgroup whose only "proof" was "I know I can't do it so nobody can!"

    We're waiting, big guy.

    Pat in TX

    It's just my opinion. I'm not an expert.

    But here are some things to consider: Look at all of the doping going
    on in all sports. Whether it's professional sports or amatuer. Look at
    the fact that corporations like Speedo, Nike, etc... have their grubby
    little mitts into athletics up to their elbows. Look at the money now
    involved, even in swimming (I would guess that Thorpe is a millionaire,
    wouldn't you? What about Phelps?). Swimmers can now make money. Look at
    the pressure to smash world records to popularize many amatuer sports.
    The list goes on...

    I'm sorry, I just can't believe (can you HONESTLY blame me or anyone
    for that matter) that many of these athletes aren't "artificial"??? In
    this day in age??? In my heart, I would love to believe that Phelps,
    Thorpe, etc... are clean. But I can't. I'm sorry. And you know what?
    It's not my fault. Did you believe Barry Bonds? Did you believe Mark
    McGuire or Sammy Sosa? Oh yeah, they're pros... How about Landis,
    Armstrong, the cycling team that was leaping-out of their hotel windows
    to avoid a raid, Ben Johnson, Marion Jones, Tim Montgomery, the Chinese
    and East German (remember how the press slammed Shirley Babashoff when
    she said so...) women, Michelle Smith, Inge de Bruijn (was Amy Van
    Dyken just being a poor sport? I don't know...) the list is endless...
    Can't prove anything. Sometimes you can, other times, well, get a
    lawyer and pretty much say nothing.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_athletes_who_tested_positive_for_ba
    nned_substances

    (granted, not all of the banned substances on the list are perfomance
    enhancing, in my opinion.)

    I think that my inability to believe that these athletes (most, but not
    all) aren't clean is completely rational given the long, long list of
    cheats in sports. Can you blame me for feeling this way and having this
    opinion? Can you blame ANYONE? I know it should be "innocent unless
    proven guilty" but I just can buy it anymore. I assume the worst...

    I know I can't do it, but many people can. More power to them. Some
    (maybe many) however, are cheats. Just my opinion, okay?

    And I'm not really a "big guy". About 5 foot nine...

    Mike (the average-sized guy)

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, Pat <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    It's just my opinion. I'm not an expert.

    And yet you call Larry "naive" and in denial? You, who have no basis for
    believing what you write, but you are passing judgment on others? Amazing!

    Quoted message said:


    I'm sorry, I just can't believe (can you HONESTLY blame me or anyone
    for that matter) that many of these athletes aren't "artificial"???

    Yes. I have this little "innocent until proven guilty" idea. Prove your
    statements before I believe them.

    And that is why you're a troll. You jump in with no proveable facts and pass
    judgment. Why doesn't that bother you? It should. I am sure you'd like the
    same assumption of innocence, right?


    Wow. So I guess I made you mad, then?

  4. In article <[email hidden]>, Pat <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    It's just my opinion. I'm not an expert.

    And yet you call Larry "naive" and in denial? You, who have no basis for
    believing what you write, but you are passing judgment on others? Amazing!

    I provided the basis for my beliefs in my last post.

    If I insulted Larry, I apologize to Larry. Who are YOU? His mom?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I'm sorry, I just can't believe (can you HONESTLY blame me or anyone
    for that matter) that many of these athletes aren't "artificial"???

    Yes. I have this little "innocent until proven guilty" idea. Prove your
    statements before I believe them.

    And that is why you're a troll. You jump in with no proveable facts and pass
    judgment. Why doesn't that bother you? It should. I am sure you'd like the
    same assumption of innocence, right?

    I never asked you to believe anything. I don't even know you...

    wow.


  5. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    It's just my opinion. I'm not an expert.

    And yet you call Larry "naive" and in denial? You, who have no basis for
    believing what you write, but you are passing judgment on others? Amazing!

    Quoted message said:


    I'm sorry, I just can't believe (can you HONESTLY blame me or anyone
    for that matter) that many of these athletes aren't "artificial"???

    Yes. I have this little "innocent until proven guilty" idea. Prove your
    statements before I believe them.

    And that is why you're a troll. You jump in with no proveable facts and pass
    judgment. Why doesn't that bother you? It should. I am sure you'd like the
    same assumption of innocence, right?


  6. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    It's just my opinion. I'm not an expert.

    And yet you call Larry "naive" and in denial? You, who have no basis for
    believing what you write, but you are passing judgment on others?
    Amazing!

    I provided the basis for my beliefs in my last post.

    You come on like Bill O'Reilly charging this and that. When asked for facts,
    you admit you have none. And now you say you provided the basis for your
    beliefs. Hell, all you said was the equivalent of "everybody does it so he
    must, too!" That's not good, troll.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.