Quoted message said:Subject: Re: There is a LIE here that needs to be corrected
From: [email hidden] (Mark)
Date: 8/8/2003 8:09 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Peter Bowditch <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:(Jan) said:Every debunkersmost likely saw it, yet NOT one spoke up!
This is despicable.
And shows the workings of *organized medcine and it's members*
>Mark Probert <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Wasn't Mercola the guy who just paid Barrett in a court case? Yes, he
was.Quoted message said:Quoted message said:
http://healthfreedomlaw.com/Welcome%20Clark%20Fights%20Back%20-%20Figueroa
%20Dismissed.htmStephen Barrett, M.D. Dismisses Libel Lawsuit against Dr. Joseph Mercola,
D.O.Quoted message said:Quoted message said:
Editorial Comment and Opinion by Carlos F. NegreteLongtime critic and foe of alternative medicine, Stephen
Barrett,Quoted message said:Quoted message said:M.D., has asked the Court in Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, to dismiss the
libelQuoted message said:Quoted message said:lawsuit that he filed against Dr. Joseph Mercola, D.O.
Here's a debunker speaking up.
The suit was withdrawn and refiled in Illinois (Circuit Court of Cook
County, Illinois, No. 01 L 009026, filed July 30, 2001). It was
settled in April 2003, when Dr Mercola admitted that he had
investigated the statements by Bolen that he had republished on his
site and had found that he could not substantiate them. The settlement
involved a payment of $50,000 to Dr Barrett for legal expenses.So does this mean that Jan is going to start a rant against Dr.
Mercola and his lies?
Sorry first Peter needs to explain the website above. Did you see the name
Barrett of Mercola there? Or did you overlook it has nothing what so ever to do
with either one of them.
<snip Mark Md's obsession with Jan>
Give up you desire to annoy and belittle people on the net, and get back to
pushing aspartame, and clearing up your pimples, Sonny. *;*
Jan