General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: The [censored] Parade

Started by MU · · Last activity · 14 posts · 377 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
20 August 2004
Last activity
22 August 2004
Original author
MU
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
377
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Bob (this one) said:

    In short. Your FAQ isn't something *you* did, it was assembled by
    people who thought you're as much a fraud as I do.

    And it is inaccurate and has been "updated" in discussion right here on SMC
    with Carmen et al. That good-for-little revek hasn't done her job, the
    weasel.

    Would you mind doing it for her, Bob, because I know you are only
    interested in the facts, Bob?

    Hurry.

  2. MU said:
    Bob (this one) said:

    In short. Your FAQ isn't something *you* did, it was assembled by
    people who thought you're as much a fraud as I do.

    And it is inaccurate and has been "updated" in discussion right here on SMC
    with Carmen et al. That good-for-little revek hasn't done her job, the
    weasel.

    I seem to have missed how she is supposed to be responsible for
    updating Hoff's FAQ on you.

    --
    jamie ([email hidden])

    "There's a seeker born every minute."

  3. MU said:
    Bob (this one) said:

    In short. Your FAQ isn't something *you* did, it was assembled by
    people who thought you're as much a fraud as I do.

    And it is inaccurate and has been "updated" in discussion right here on SMC
    with Carmen et al. That good-for-little revek hasn't done her job, the
    weasel.

    Funny thing about that. Perhaps you could provide the "updated"
    information to insure its accuracy, MU_shroom. Are there more examples
    of your artifice? Further pictures of your hollow boasts? Greater
    detail about your unsupported claims? Love to see them...

    Quoted message said:

    Would you mind doing it for her, Bob, because I know you are only
    interested in the facts, Bob?

    Oh, and don't forget the other URL's that deal with you. These:
    <http://tinyurl.com/hdex>
    <http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html>
    <http://tinyurl.com/royd>

    Together they offer a rather rich portrait of a blowhard phony who
    keeps morphing when the fakery is detected. But I wonder when you're
    going to put in that buffoonery when you called yourself "fishbone" in
    French and didn't know it? But I mean all that in the nicest possible way.

    Bob

  4. jamie said:
    MU said:
    Bob (this one) said:

    In short. Your FAQ isn't something *you* did, it was assembled by
    people who thought you're as much a fraud as I do.

    And it is inaccurate and has been "updated" in discussion right here on SMC
    with Carmen et al. That good-for-little revek hasn't done her job, the
    weasel.

    I seem to have missed how she is supposed to be responsible for
    updating Hoff's FAQ on you.

    Um... It's MU_sical chairs talking. It doesn't have to make sense...

    Another bit taken from Chung's repertoire where you ostensibly offer
    people the opportunity to go somewhere for more info as though it
    actually supported you. That FAQ, as you know, blasts the faker MU_ngo
    and details many of his previous deceits. The other two are good, as well.

    <http://tinyurl.com/hdex>
    <http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html>
    <http://tinyurl.com/royd>

    Bob

  5. Bob (this one) said:
    jamie said:
    MU said:

    On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:16:29 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

    >In short. Your FAQ isn't something *you* did, it was assembled by
    >people who thought you're as much a fraud as I do.

    And it is inaccurate and has been "updated" in discussion right here on SMC
    with Carmen et al. That good-for-little revek hasn't done her job, the
    weasel.

    I seem to have missed how she is supposed to be responsible for
    updating Hoff's FAQ on you.

    Um... It's MU_sical chairs talking. It doesn't have to make sense...

    Another bit taken from Chung's repertoire where you ostensibly offer
    people the opportunity to go somewhere for more info as though it
    actually supported you. That FAQ, as you know, blasts the faker MU_ngo
    and details many of his previous deceits. The other two are good, as well.

    <http://tinyurl.com/hdex>
    <http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html>
    <http://tinyurl.com/royd>

    I'd forgotten much of his list of claimed accomplishments, which
    apparently, in Mu-think, make him uniquely "qualified" to interpret
    medical studies.

    - Co-owned Minor League Baseball team.
    - Real estate baron.
    - IT expert, working for IBM, etc.
    - Fitness Guru, representing an elite group of international trainers.
    - Trainer for Professional Baseball Players.
    - Trainer for NFL Players.
    - Trainer for Professional Tennis Players.
    - State Legislator.
    - Presidential Campaign Vice Chairman.
    - 4 time National Champion Coach.

    --
    jamie ([email hidden])

    "There's a seeker born every minute."

  6. jamie said:
    Quoted message said:

    And it is inaccurate and has been "updated" in discussion right here on SMC
    with Carmen et al. That good-for-little revek hasn't done her job, the
    weasel.

    I seem to have missed how she is supposed to be responsible for
    updating Hoff's FAQ on you.

    Too bad; pay better attention.

  7. jamie said:

    I'd forgotten much of his list of claimed accomplishments, which
    apparently, in Mu-think, make him uniquely "qualified" to interpret
    medical studies.

    There you go again, jamie, full of it as usual. I am not qualified to
    interpret "medical studies" and have posted that several dozen times
    before. Unlike you, I know where my education ends and begins and don't run
    around Usenet quoting "medical studies" as you do, as if you had a clue
    about them in the first place.

    When I want information, I go to those that CAN interpret them and listen
    to what they have to say. Have you? Nope, you aren't bright enough to even
    do that.

    And they don't just read the "extracts" either.

    <lol>

  8. Bob (this one) said:
    Quoted message said:

    And it is inaccurate and has been "updated" in discussion right here on SMC
    with Carmen et al. That good-for-little revek hasn't done her job, the
    weasel.

    Funny thing about that. Perhaps you could provide the "updated"
    information to insure its accuracy, MU_shroom.

    Asked and answered; do your own obsessed-with-Mu homework.

  9. MU said:
    Bob (this one) said:
    Quoted message said:

    And it is inaccurate and has been "updated" in discussion right here on SMC
    with Carmen et al. That good-for-little revek hasn't done her job, the
    weasel.

    Funny thing about that. Perhaps you could provide the "updated"
    information to insure its accuracy, MU_shroom.

    Asked and answered; do your own obsessed-with-Mu homework.

    <LOLOL> See how eager you are to set the record straight? I can just
    see the sincerity dripping off you. The pure desire for all-truth to
    prevail. The air-clear record you desire others to compile about you
    for you.

    The only "updated" information I've seen has been more uncheckable
    claims designed to further inflate your already obviously phony
    "history." It works like this: Want to be considered as anything but a
    blowhard fake? Then offer something substantial to back it up.

    Good abbreviation: BUBO. It means back it up or back it out.

    Eagerly awaiting your further clarification and elaboration of your
    "updated" information. Bwahaha

    Bob

  10. MU said:
    jamie said:

    I'd forgotten much of his list of claimed accomplishments, which
    apparently, in Mu-think, make him uniquely "qualified" to
    interpret medical studies.

    There you go again, jamie, full of it as usual.

    <LOL> Poor humorless MU_scoid. It was a sarcastic jibe, not a real
    reference to your education. Once again, that whooooossshing sound is
    the point zooming past you.

    Quoted message said:

    I am not qualified to interpret "medical studies" and have posted
    that several dozen times before. Unlike you, I know where my
    education ends and begins and don't run around Usenet quoting
    "medical studies" as you do, as if you had a clue about them in the
    first place.

    <psssst> (you'll probably want to lose this kind of comment. If you
    can't interpret the studies, then you can't tell if someone else can.
    See how that works. Word from a dear, dear friend.)

    Quoted message said:

    When I want information, I go to those that CAN interpret them and
    listen to what they have to say.

    Um, not to be combative or anything, but that style of behavior hasn't
    been how you've comported yourself here. Maybe the future, right...?

    Quoted message said:

    Have you? Nope, you aren't bright enough to even do that.

    Well, you don't know that, do you? It appears to be merely an effort
    to be unkind. Why can't we all just get along?

    Quoted message said:

    And they don't just read the "extracts" either.

    <lol>

    That peculiar laughter after an unclear sentence with poorly
    delineated antecedents just seems off-kilter. It appears that Jamie
    has, in fact, rather nicely and with rather rich figurative imagery
    skewered your boastful claims. Not to put too fine a point on it.

    Bob

  11. Bob (this one) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Funny thing about that. Perhaps you could provide the "updated"

    Quoted message said:

    information to insure its accuracy, MU_shroom.

    Asked and answered; do your own obsessed-with-Mu homework.

    Bob (Pastorio this one) said:

    <LOLOL> See how eager you are to set the record straight?

    Done it several times. All is in Google. No need to repeat.

    Quoted message said:

    The only "updated" information I've seen has been more uncheckable
    claims designed to further inflate your already obviously phony
    "history." It works like this: Want to be considered as anything but a
    blowhard fake? Then offer something substantial to back it up.

    Done it.

    Quoted message said:

    Eagerly awaiting your further clarification and elaboration of your
    "updated" information.

    Done it several times. All is in Google. No need to repeat.

    I tell you what is so funny about you, Bob. Chung knows me quite well, Bob.
    He knows my history, Bob, my past, Bob, he knows my family, Bob my work,
    Bob, he knows the details, Bob.

    If I was to come to Usenet with a great deal of fabrication, then not only
    would he know I was lying, I would have to eat across the table with a good
    friend, as a liar, as a Christian liar, a false witness, Bob, an
    embarrassment to myself and to Christ, Bob. More importantly, Christ would
    know I was lying and there is nothing I would hate more than to have to
    face Him every day with those lies. I simply could not do it.

    You are nothing, really, to me; Christ is everything and Andrew Chung's
    friendship is very special to me.

    Make sense of why I would throw all that good away for a pseudo-Usenet
    profile. Toss away eternity and a fine, close friend to do what? Impress a
    bunch of folks I don't know?

    You nearly threw your temporal life away with your obsession with food. You
    have no eternal life to look forward to. I understand how important Usenet
    is to you since you have so little else. Nothing permanent, just words on a
    screen, debate for the sake of your ego.

    Your presence on Usenet is clear to me; this is IT for you. Life now, grab
    it while you can, bloat yourself up, what else have you to live for?

    Now, if you will excuse me, Bob, I see that my beautiful wife is dressed
    (which means I now know what to wear), I have a 31st Anniversary to
    celebrate, Bob. Wonderful restaurant, overlooking the Chattahoochee,
    serene and cool evening. No RPGs, no unbearable heat, no incivility, Bob.

    So off with you, Bob. I leave you to your act, Bob, of defaming and
    ridiculing Jesus Christ, Chung, Mu, and whomever else you get your sadistic
    kicks from in this temporal world you live in. Your world, the only one you
    have, slipping away moment to moment, soon to be gone forever. And you
    along with it.

    Oh, one last thing, this should really [censored] you off, Bob. Your head will
    spin like Linda Blair's.

    Add "race car driver" to my FAQ. revek apparently isn't up to the task,
    poor thing.

    I got my Competition License on Saturday. My car is built (Formula Vee,
    Caracal, Noble engined, #11) prepped and ready to go. Kit Car Challenge,
    NASA Pro Racing, race series suggested and started by none other
    than.........

    You know the rest.

  12. MU said:

    On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:35:23 -0400, Bob (this one) wrote:

    ***MU_ley warning*** This post is longer than your attention span has
    been able to support in the past. I apologize in advance for stressing
    you so much. I'm sure your accomplishments and credentials will
    sustain you in your hour of, um, imbecility.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Funny thing about that. Perhaps you could provide the
    > "updated" information to insure its accuracy, MU_shroom.

    Asked and answered; do your own obsessed-with-Mu homework.

    Bob (Pastorio this one) said:

    <LOLOL> See how eager you are to set the record straight?

    Done it several times. All is in Google. No need to repeat.

    Everybody who lies claims the same thing. "It's already out there, why
    should I do it again?" If you have to ask, either you're the fraud
    everyone thinks you are or you genuinely don't get it. No benefit of
    the doubt for you, MU_zz.

    You're a blatant fraud. You're a sad little man who feels the need to
    inflate credentials and experience. You're a blowhard who supports
    nothing you say. You insult others with the very things you're guilty
    of. Take my word for it, it's funny. I like to prod you into ever more
    fantastic claims and ever more fantastic contradictions and ever more
    fantastic claims...

    You're a hoot, MU_chacho.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The only "updated" information I've seen has been more
    uncheckable claims designed to further inflate your already
    obviously phony "history." It works like this: Want to be
    considered as anything but a blowhard fake? Then offer something
    substantial to back it up.

    Done it.

    <LOL> The famous MU_stard invisible testimonials. Right...

    So what's backed up? Training credentials? Um, no. Military stuff? Uh,
    no. Academic background? Er, no. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Eagerly awaiting your further clarification and elaboration of
    your "updated" information.

    Done it several times. All is in Google. No need to repeat.

    Right. <LOL> Look up "fraud, blowhard, baseball, race car
    driver, professional athlete, real estate developer, California
    politician, presidential advisor, Memphis entrepreneur, Atlanta
    trainer..."

    Here. Let me show you what I found in Google.
    <http://tinyurl.com/hdex>
    <http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html>
    <http://tinyurl.com/royd>

    Quoted message said:

    I tell you what is so funny about you, Bob. Chung knows me quite
    well, Bob. He knows my history, Bob, my past, Bob, he knows my
    family, Bob my work, Bob, he knows the details, Bob.

    And for some reason, you fear to put that up here, or even enough of
    it to remove the taint of fakery you carry. For some reason, you're
    unable to stand behind your words and take responsibility for them.
    For some reason, you feel the need to assemble a frankly incredible
    list of "credentials" and rail when they're rejected. For some reason,
    complete truth seems to be beyond you. No psychological examination
    here, just explaining the facts in evidence and stating the puzzle.
    It's only natural to ask "why" when confronted with this sort of
    slip-sliding.

    Quoted message said:

    If I was to come to Usenet with a great deal of fabrication, then
    not only would he know I was lying, I would have to eat across the
    table with a good friend, as a liar, as a Christian liar, a false
    witness, Bob, an embarrassment to myself and to Christ, Bob.

    Um, I suspect that's what the general consensus is already. In the
    absence of evidence to the contrary. Occam's Razor again...

    Quoted message said:

    More importantly, Christ would know I was lying and there is
    nothing I would hate more than to have to face Him every day with
    those lies. I simply could not do it.

    Bwah... You're not only a liar and a fraud, you're a sanctimonious
    Philistine. I can hear the organ music in the background and the smell
    of incense. <LOL>

    You've invented so many demonstrable lies that your claims
    of not being what you've proven yourself to be are yet more very funny
    deceit. Hilarious. Look at the poor virginal boy "proving" his
    honesty. <LOL> And Chung lies, too. You're in good company. I'm kidding.

    I had an employee who stole from me and when I finally could prove it,
    his brilliant defense was "I wouldn't steal. It's against the
    commandments." He had the stolen stuff in his pocket. Stop me if
    you're the guy...

    Quoted message said:

    You are nothing, really, to me; Christ is everything and Andrew
    Chung's friendship is very special to me.

    Make sense of why I would throw all that good away for a
    pseudo-Usenet profile. Toss away eternity and a fine, close friend
    to do what? Impress a bunch of folks I don't know?

    Weak, MU_tch. Very weak. It's exactly what you do.

    Quoted message said:

    You nearly threw your temporal life away with your obsession with
    food.

    See, [censored], it's statements like this pulled out of thin air that
    brands you a shabby liar and dissembler. You have no idea about this.

    Quoted message said:

    You have no eternal life to look forward to.

    More of the same. It is most assuredly not up to you to make that
    assessment. You can't know that.

    Quoted message said:

    I understand how important Usenet is to you since you have so
    little else.

    More of the same. And I bet you still can't understand why you're
    considered a phony from post one until today. You can't even imagine
    what's in my life, yet you base your absurd maunderings on invented
    nonsense. That's creating falsehoods. That's lying. Just like you say
    you don't do. Hmmmm.

    Law of exclusivity clicks in - "a thing cannot be and not be at the
    same time." Either it is (lying) or it isn't (lying). Sadly for you,
    it is. You are.

    Quoted message said:

    Nothing permanent, just words on a screen, debate for the sake of
    your ego.

    <LOL> From MU_lchpile...

    FOITN

    Quoted message said:

    Your presence on Usenet is clear to me; this is IT for you. Life
    now, grab it while you can, bloat yourself up, what else have you
    to live for?

    Honest relationships with everybody. Clear positions with everybody.
    Identity forward, clearly me, a real person, traceable, findable and
    brave enough to stand behind what I say. Exactly unlike you. The
    difference is startling, actually.

    I think you've caught Chung's "Truth Ray." Might want to try some
    antibullshitics. New kind of medicine invented just for you.

    Quoted message said:

    Now, if you will excuse me, Bob, I see that my beautiful wife is
    dressed (which means I now know what to wear), I have a 31st
    Anniversary to celebrate, Bob. Wonderful restaurant, overlooking
    the Chattahoochee, serene and cool evening. No RPGs, no unbearable
    heat, no incivility, Bob.

    Obviously you have better taste than she does.

    Quoted message said:

    So off with you, Bob. I leave you to your act, Bob, of defaming and
    ridiculing Jesus Christ, Chung, Mu,

    See, smallwit, it's more of the same fabrication. I have nothing bad
    to say about Jesus and never have. You'd like to believe that and I
    suspect you really do because I don't see him as my walking buddy like
    you do. But your fanatical aberrations and invented fundamentalist
    understandings certainly don't make them true.

    I mock you and Chung because you get it the old fashioned way - you
    earn it. You are bluster with no solidity, too timorous to come out in
    the daylight; apparently too frightened of the repercussions should
    you ever reveal yourself. He is arrogant ego desperate to win every
    encounter even when there's no contest; even when he posts something
    demonstrably in error or false and has been shown to be wrong. Both of
    you are victims of your own needs to be 100% right.

    Quoted message said:

    and whomever else you get your sadistic kicks from in this temporal
    world you live in.

    I can only wonder why you revile, disparage, denigrate, scorn, defame,
    and otherwise assail others you don't know. Looks like that ego thing.
    And how sad is it that it seems to be the only thing you're capable of.

    Quoted message said:

    Your world, the only one you have, slipping away moment to moment,
    soon to be gone forever. And you along with it.

    <LOL> Oh, wow. This is, like, philosophy or something. Oh, wait maybe
    it's from the DaVinci code... Maybe another assault using religious
    fanaticism as a blunt instrument. Jesus will love you for that,
    huh...? I bet he says something about it the next time you walk with
    him. Just saying, is all...

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, one last thing, this should really [censored] you off, Bob. Your
    head will spin like Linda Blair's.

    <LOL> You're so consumed with yourself that you can't imagine that
    everyone isn't. Poor, poor, guy. Actually, I would be pleased if you
    could actually prove this. It would be a string of one.

    Quoted message said:

    Add "race car driver" to my FAQ. revek apparently isn't up to the
    task, poor thing.

    I can't speak for Revek, but I suspect you occupy less than a big
    place in her life (he said in a burst of understatement). She heaped a
    rather restrained helping of scorn on you, just like, but more gently
    than, the other FAQ's that detail your duplicitous dealings.

    Quoted message said:

    I got my Competition License on Saturday. My car is built (Formula
    Vee, Caracal, Noble engined, #11) prepped and ready to go. Kit Car
    Challenge, NASA Pro Racing, race series suggested and started by
    none other than.........

    You know the rest.

    Actually, I don't. Since I don't know much about auto racing or much
    care about it, I don't know what you're talking about. So where can I
    check out your new license? Licensed by whom? To what name? Which
    Saturday? Is it online somewhere? Or is it another bit of blowhardery.

    I once saw this really elegant cross stitch sampler with cherubs and
    pretty flowers and twining vines and in the middle it said, "I love
    you, but cut the cards anyway." You might want to apply that to your
    actions vis a vis the world.

    The only things I know that are true about you are here
    <http://tinyurl.com/hdex>
    <http://www.geocities.com/tanirevek/Roose.html>
    <http://tinyurl.com/royd>

    Bob

  13. MU said:


    Bob (this one) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Funny thing about that. Perhaps you could provide the "updated"
    >information to insure its accuracy, MU_shroom.

    Asked and answered; do your own obsessed-with-Mu homework.

    Bob (Pastorio this one) said:

    <LOLOL> See how eager you are to set the record straight?

    Done it several times. All is in Google. No need to repeat.

    Quoted message said:

    The only "updated" information I've seen has been more uncheckable
    claims designed to further inflate your already obviously phony
    "history." It works like this: Want to be considered as anything but a
    blowhard fake? Then offer something substantial to back it up.

    Done it.

    Quoted message said:

    Eagerly awaiting your further clarification and elaboration of your
    "updated" information.

    Done it several times. All is in Google. No need to repeat.

    I tell you what is so funny about you, Bob. Chung knows me quite well, Bob.
    He knows my history, Bob, my past, Bob, he knows my family, Bob my work,
    Bob, he knows the details, Bob.

    If I was to come to Usenet with a great deal of fabrication, then not only
    would he know I was lying, I would have to eat across the table with a good
    friend, as a liar, as a Christian liar, a false witness, Bob, an
    embarrassment to myself and to Christ, Bob. More importantly, Christ would
    know I was lying and there is nothing I would hate more than to have to
    face Him every day with those lies. I simply could not do it.

    You are nothing, really, to me; Christ is everything and Andrew Chung's
    friendship is very special to me.

    Make sense of why I would throw all that good away for a pseudo-Usenet
    profile. Toss away eternity and a fine, close friend to do what? Impress a
    bunch of folks I don't know?

    You nearly threw your temporal life away with your obsession with food. You
    have no eternal life to look forward to. I understand how important Usenet
    is to you since you have so little else. Nothing permanent, just words on a
    screen, debate for the sake of your ego.

    Your presence on Usenet is clear to me; this is IT for you. Life now, grab
    it while you can, bloat yourself up, what else have you to live for?

    Now, if you will excuse me, Bob, I see that my beautiful wife is dressed
    (which means I now know what to wear), I have a 31st Anniversary to
    celebrate, Bob. Wonderful restaurant, overlooking the Chattahoochee,
    serene and cool evening. No RPGs, no unbearable heat, no incivility, Bob.

    Congrats to you and Mrs. Mu :-)

    My prayers remain with both of you, in Christ's name.

    Quoted message said:

    So off with you, Bob. I leave you to your act, Bob, of defaming and
    ridiculing Jesus Christ, Chung, Mu, and whomever else you get your sadistic
    kicks from in this temporal world you live in. Your world, the only one you
    have, slipping away moment to moment, soon to be gone forever. And you
    along with it.

    Oh, one last thing, this should really [censored] you off, Bob. Your head will
    spin like Linda Blair's.

    Add "race car driver" to my FAQ. revek apparently isn't up to the task,
    poor thing.

    I got my Competition License on Saturday. My car is built (Formula Vee,
    Caracal, Noble engined, #11) prepped and ready to go. Kit Car Challenge,
    NASA Pro Racing, race series suggested and started by none other
    than.........

    You know the rest.

    May God bless you and yours today and everyday :-)

    You remain in my prayers to God, in Christ's name, dear brother whom I
    love.

    Servant to the humblest person in the universe,

    Andrew

    --
    Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
    Board-Certified Cardiologist
    http://www.heartmdphd.com/

    **
    Who is the humblest person in the universe?
    http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048

    What is all this about?
    http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48

    Is this spam?
    http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867


  14. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Now, if you will excuse me, Bob, I see that my beautiful wife is dressed
    (which means I now know what to wear), I have a 31st Anniversary to
    celebrate, Bob. Wonderful restaurant, overlooking the Chattahoochee,
    serene and cool evening. No RPGs, no unbearable heat, no incivility, Bob.

    MD/PhD said:

    Congrats to you and Mrs. Mu :-)

    lol

    Quoted message said:

    My prayers remain with both of you, in Christ's name.

    Thank you, sir.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.