General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Super Size Me

Started by Suze · · Last activity · 30 posts · 630 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
10 April 2005
Last activity
12 May 2005
Original author
Suze
Posts
30
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
630
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 30
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoting dwacon:

    Quoted message said:

    My TIVO recorded this movie for me -- it was interesting to watch. I swore
    off Mickey Dee's a long time ago...

    Can you believe it took over 12 weeks of austerity and working out to undo
    the damage from one month of eating McDo's ???

    I don't find it surprising at all. Spurlock basically doubled his
    caloric intake from ~2500 cal to ~5000 cal/day (oink, oink), avoided
    exercise, and ate every single meal there.

    Spurlock certainly could have continued to walk instead of taking cabs.
    He also could have continued to eat ~2500 cal/day instead of stuffing
    his face to prove a point.

    But then, there would be no sensationalist story for people to lap up.

  2. Suze said:

    Spurlock certainly could have continued to
    walk instead of taking cabs.
    He also could have continued to eat ~2500
    cal/day instead of stuffing his face to
    prove a point.

    But then, there would be no sensationalist
    story for people to lap up.

    Agreed. Still he balances his sensationalistic story in some manner by
    offering up the interviews with the Big Mac fan. Still skinny!

    Moderation is the word of the day.

    --
    Curt
    http://curtjames.com/

  3. Suze said:

    Quoting dwacon:

    Quoted message said:

    My TIVO recorded this movie for me -- it was interesting to watch.


    I swore

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    off Mickey Dee's a long time ago...

    Can you believe it took over 12 weeks of austerity and working out


    to undo

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the damage from one month of eating McDo's ???

    I don't find it surprising at all. Spurlock basically doubled his
    caloric intake from ~2500 cal to ~5000 cal/day (oink, oink), avoided
    exercise, and ate every single meal there.

    Spurlock certainly could have continued to walk instead of taking


    cabs.

    Quoted message said:

    He also could have continued to eat ~2500 cal/day instead of stuffing

    Quoted message said:

    his face to prove a point.

    But then, there would be no sensationalist story for people to lap


    up.

    His reduction in exercise was the MORE likely culprit of many of his
    woes than his WOE. The guy was wlaking upwards of ten miles a day then
    he stopped cold turkey and started cabbing it...seems very few people
    pick up on this.

  4. "gman99" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Suze said:

    Quoting dwacon:

    Quoted message said:

    My TIVO recorded this movie for me -- it was interesting to watch.


    I swore

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    off Mickey Dee's a long time ago...

    Can you believe it took over 12 weeks of austerity and working out


    to undo

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the damage from one month of eating McDo's ???

    I don't find it surprising at all. Spurlock basically doubled his
    caloric intake from ~2500 cal to ~5000 cal/day (oink, oink), avoided
    exercise, and ate every single meal there.

    Spurlock certainly could have continued to walk instead of taking


    cabs.

    Quoted message said:

    He also could have continued to eat ~2500 cal/day instead of stuffing

    Quoted message said:

    his face to prove a point.

    But then, there would be no sensationalist story for people to lap


    up.

    His reduction in exercise was the MORE likely culprit of many of his
    woes than his WOE. The guy was wlaking upwards of ten miles a day then
    he stopped cold turkey and started cabbing it...seems very few people
    pick up on this.

    That too was part of the design of his experiment. Most Americans walk less
    than 5000 steps per day, so he wore a pedometer and restricted his walking
    to that much.

    He wanted to see, and document, the health effects of eating "typical" meals
    at McD's, and exercising no more than the average couch potato. The fact
    that it had such a huge impact on his health, in such a short period of
    time, was pretty interesting.

    Was it a documentary with a distinct point of view? Sure, most
    documentaries are. But, it was also very well done, and made it's point.
    And, McD's ended their "Super Size" offers even before the movie came out,
    so it achieved some good too.

    GG

  5. "gman99" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
    [snip]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Spurlock certainly could have continued to walk instead of taking


    cabs.


    [snip]

    Quoted message said:


    His reduction in exercise was the MORE likely culprit of many of his
    woes than his WOE. The guy was wlaking upwards of ten miles a day then
    he stopped cold turkey and started cabbing it...seems very few people
    pick up on this.

    IIRC this was done to equate his energy expendature to that of the
    average (US) sedentry individual (as opposed to what he was).

    This was used to support his thesis that the average person with
    averge energy expendature could not regularly dine on McD's and stay
    healthy.

    --
    Adam PR Taylor
    http://www.nelliedog.co.nz


  6. Quoted message said:


    This was used to support his thesis that the average person with
    averge energy expendature could not regularly dine on McD's and stay
    healthy.

    This was in no way a scientific endeavor...this was sensationlist [censored]
    to make a buck !!


  7. Quoted message said:

    That too was part of the design of his experiment. Most Americans


    walk less

    Quoted message said:

    than 5000 steps per day, so he wore a pedometer and restricted his


    walking

    Quoted message said:

    to that much.

    It was but no mention was made of this reduction in exercise after the
    start of this one subject experiment. Everything was blamed SOLELY on
    the diet.

  8. "gman99" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    This was used to support his thesis that the average person with
    averge energy expendature could not regularly dine on McD's and stay
    healthy.

    This was in no way a scientific endeavor...this was sensationlist [censored]
    to make a buck !!

    Duuuhh...it was a documentary film, not a PhD thesis. It turned out to be a
    very entertaining, and very successful documentary film.

    Are you an employee of McD's? You sound like an apologist for their crappy,
    fat-laden menu.

    GG


  9. Quoted message said:

    It was but no mention was made of this reduction in exercise after the
    start of this one subject experiment. Everything was blamed SOLELY on
    the diet.

    + It was made clear that this is what he was doing. How many times in a
    movie do you want to be reminded what you've already been told? Man, and
    they say I'm big and dumb.


  10. Quoted message said:


    This was in no way a scientific endeavor...this was sensationlist [censored]
    to make a buck !!

    + Yeah, as opposed to the [censored] served by McDonalds to make a buck.

  11. WooferBearATL said:
    Quoted message said:

    It was but no mention was made of this reduction in exercise after


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    start of this one subject experiment. Everything was blamed SOLELY


    on

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the diet.

    + It was made clear that this is what he was doing. How many times


    in a

    Quoted message said:

    movie do you want to be reminded what you've already been told? Man,


    and

    Quoted message said:

    they say I'm big and dumb.

    It was very clear that he blamed ALL of his bad numbers on the food and
    nothing on the lack of exercise. After stating that he was reducing
    exercise there was NO FURTHER mention of this. NOWHERE did he suggest
    that his lack of exercise might be partly responsible for his failing
    health, weight gain and such...it was ALWAYS the food !! Always
    MCDONALDS fault !!!

  12. WooferBearATL said:
    Quoted message said:


    This was in no way a scientific endeavor...this was sensationlist


    [censored]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to make a buck !!

    + Yeah, as opposed to the [censored] served by McDonalds to make a buck.

    Never ONCE heard McD's advertise their menu as well balanced, eat every
    meal there !!

  13. On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 06:26:28 -0700, "GaryG" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "gman99" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    This was used to support his thesis that the average person with
    averge energy expendature could not regularly dine on McD's and stay
    healthy.

    This was in no way a scientific endeavor...this was sensationlist [censored]
    to make a buck !!

    Duuuhh...it was a documentary film, not a PhD thesis. It turned out to be a
    very entertaining, and very successful documentary film.

    Are you an employee of McD's? You sound like an apologist for their crappy,
    fat-laden menu.

    GG

    No, he's acutally our resident moron here at mfw.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "And all this peace has been deceiving,
    I need some wind to get me sailing"

  14. ">

    Quoted message said:

    It was very clear that he blamed ALL of his bad numbers on the food and
    nothing on the lack of exercise. After stating that he was reducing
    exercise there was NO FURTHER mention of this. NOWHERE did he suggest
    that his lack of exercise might be partly responsible for his failing
    health, weight gain and such...it was ALWAYS the food !! Always
    MCDONALDS fault !!!

    + You're right. He really should have run a scroll at the bottom of the
    screen. He could have repeated over and over again everything that he
    already said. Heck, if CNN can do it - why not at the movies?

    Quoted message said:

  15. Quoted message said:


    Never ONCE heard McD's advertise their menu as well balanced, eat every
    meal there !!


    + No, infact he tried to get comment from them for weeks. Their press
    manager never did get back with him. Man, she musta been a busy lady to not
    respond for weeks and weeks and weeks. Top it off to not respond to someone
    putting together a film that was going to be released nationally, that was a
    pretty pour decision.

  16. WooferBearATL said:

    +

    Dude, cut this stupid quoting [censored] out. Just post like a normal person.
    Jeez.

  17. "The Queen of Cans and Jars" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    WooferBearATL said:

    +

    Dude, cut this stupid quoting [censored] out. Just post like a normal person.
    Jeez.

    Trace was "abnormal" long time ago.

    🙂

    David

  18. David Cohen said:
    The Queen of Cans and Jars said:
    WooferBearATL said:

    +

    Dude, cut this stupid quoting [censored] out. Just post like a normal person.
    Jeez.

    Trace was "abnormal" long time ago.

    🙂

    I'm all for freaks, being one myself, but when they insist on putting
    out sloppy posts with twee posting tics that make them look "special,"
    I'm often compelled to tell them how annoying they are.

  19. ">

    Quoted message said:

    I'm all for freaks, being one myself, but when they insist on putting
    out sloppy posts with twee posting tics that make them look "special,"
    I'm often compelled to tell them how annoying they are.


    + Someone with the name "Queen of Cans and Jars" is telling me that I'm
    annoying. Here's clue - I was a member of this board long before you were
    around. I'm certain that I know more about lifting than you have ever even
    thought of and I really don't care what you think.

  20. WooferBearATL said:


    ">

    Quoted message said:

    I'm all for freaks, being one myself, but when they insist on putting
    out sloppy posts with twee posting tics that make them look "special,"
    I'm often compelled to tell them how annoying they are.


    + Someone with the name "Queen of Cans and Jars" is telling me that I'm
    annoying. Here's clue - I was a member of this board long before you were
    around. I'm certain that I know more about lifting than you have ever even
    thought of and I really don't care what you think.

    Well, your quoting style does make you look like a moron. Looks like
    you're using Outlook Express? IIRC, people who use OE are often asked
    to use a program called OE Quotefix or somesuch. Perhaps someone else
    here that uses that retarded piece of [censored] would be kind enough to
    help you.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "And all this peace has been deceiving,
    I need some wind to get me sailing"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.