Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit of a phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current revisionism seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and the original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is evil but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in moderation". That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
Does sugar in any way add anything useful to the diet?
Is sugar completely free of any adverse impact on health?
TC
Quoted message said:
Yes, we know, not only was it tortured logic but we also have had it demonstrated why it is so several times now. A cherry picked bit
of a
Quoted message said:
phrase and tortured logic applied to generalize it compounded the illogical discourse and is par for the course. The current
revisionism
Quoted message said:
seems to indicate that the reality of this is starting to dawn and
the
Quoted message said:
original assertion now pulled back,ie. it is not any sugar that is
evil
Quoted message said:
but sugar in excess, whatever that is. Is there any nutritiional substance not "evil" in excess?
Quoted message said:
It wasn't tortured. They said that sugar was not evil "in
moderation".
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
That implies that there is a problem with sugar when consumed in amounts that are not moderate. It makes perfect sense and is very logically clear and concise.
