General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly

Started by Peter Bowditch · · Last activity · 10 posts · 601 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 July 2003
Last activity
5 July 2003
Original author
Peter Bowditch
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
601
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 7/3/2003 3:31 AM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (Jan) said:

    Not knowing when to shut up is how you landed in court.

    On which date did Mark Thorson go to court?

    I don't know and don't care.

    Why do you ask??

    I asked because you seem to be implying that he went to court. As I
    hadn't heard this, I thought you might know some details.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Or is that another of these things that nobody is allowed to know,
    like his original words containing the word "deliberately"?

    Poor Peter.

    Desperate.

    His *orginal* statement is not the issue.

    Pardon? His original statement is the only thing that matters. It is
    the only place where it could have been said (rather than implied)
    that something was done "deliberately".

    Quoted message said:

    He lies are plainly seen as well as yours and Peter Morans.

    As I have never been given the opportunity to see his lies, I can't
    really comment on that. I have never seen Peter Moran tell a lie, so I
    don't really know what you are talking about there.

    Quoted message said:

    Your hole is getting wider and deeper.

    Should I talk to Julian Snelling? (No relation to Andrew
    http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/a_snelling.asp I
    assume)

    http://www.blowfish.com/catalog/toys/snelling_butt_toys.html

    <snip many Kb of repetition>

    --
    Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight

  2. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 7/3/2003 9:02 PM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 7/3/2003 3:31 AM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

    >Not knowing when to shut up is how you landed in court.

    On which date did Mark Thorson go to court?

    I don't know and don't care.

    Why do you ask??

    I asked because you seem to be implying that he went to court. As I
    hadn't heard this, I thought you might know some details.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Or is that another of these things that nobody is allowed to know,
    like his original words containing the word "deliberately"?

    Poor Peter.

    Desperate.

    His *orginal* statement is not the issue.

    Pardon? His original statement is the only thing that matters

    No, I think not.

    His retraction matters.

    Othewise there would be no need to make it.

    Quoted message said:

    It is the only place where it could have been said (rather than implied)
    that something was done "deliberately".

    Simply absurd.

    Your rush to defend him, just makes that hole deeper and wider.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    He lies are plainly seen as well as yours and Peter Morans.

    Quoted message said:

    As I have never been given the opportunity to see his lies,

    Righto.

    Neither can you see Peter Moran's lies, neither have you known Baratz to lie,
    and of course you can't explain your own.

    Quoted message said:

    I can't really comment on that. I have never seen Peter Moran tell a lie, so I
    don't really know what you are talking about there.

    Uh huh, and at this very moment, you are lying through your teeth.

    You know it, *I* know it any sane truthful person knows it and GOD knows it.

    See any fraud, any cover-uups, any dishonesty or any lies here Peter???

    You seem to keep dodging this. How come??

    Can'T break the *good ole boy and girl club *snydrome??

    Step right up Peter, don't be shy.

    http://www.msnbc.com/news/809196.asp

    Peter Moran wrote:

    All medical advances have entailed risk, ever since the first caveman said"I
    wonder what this berry does?".

    Using retroviruses to try and correct lethal and potentially lethal gene
    defects is a very legitimate and logic alavenue of medical research. So this is
    nothing to do with "conspiracies", "coverups" .

    It is a matter of the quality of informed consent that was applied. It would
    be unusual these days for such issues to not be addressed carefully by the
    researchers and the ethics committees to which all clinical trials are
    submitted thesedays. We cannot know how culpable the doctors are from this
    rather emotive news item.

    Peter Moran
    ==============================

    Years earlier, a scientist just a few miles away from the Gelsinger’s home in
    Tucson had raised serious questions about whether the experiment was safe.

    Documents

    • Feb. 8, 2002: FDA letter, attempt to ban Dr. Wilson from other
    experiments.
    • March 3, 2000: FDA Warning Letter, original findings about the gene
    therapy experiment.

    (SEE ANY COVER-UPS THERE, PETER??)

    The trouble is, Paul Gelsinger says, Dr. Wilson’s team had never told him
    that anyone had ever raised questions about safety

    (That's fine and dandy according to organized medicine member, Peter Moran.)

    AND PETER BOWDITCH!!

    ADVERSE REACTIONS WERE NOT REPORTED
    And that was just the beginning. Federal investigators, pouring through
    Penn’s records, announced at the conference that they had made a series of
    startling discoveries, raising questions about whether the doctors had covered
    up problems and broken basic test rules.

    In fact, just a few months before Jesse had signed up for the experiment,
    several monkeys given viruses similar to Jesse’s got sick. And two of them
    died.

    (SEE ANY COVER-UP THERE PETER??))

    The rules for the experiment said: Even if volunteers didn’t get visibly ill,
    if tests showed that any of them had a significant reaction called “grade
    3,” the experiment was supposed to be “halted” immediately.
    Records show there were “grade 3” reactions in more than one
    patient. The first time, doctors stopped, called the government and got
    permission to continue, saying an unusual condition with the patient might have
    been the cause.
    The second time, they stopped, called and got permission again, citing
    another unusual condition.
    But when it happened a third time, they didn’t stop, didn’t call.
    Then, a fourth time. They didn’t stop or call then either

    (FOUR TIMES PETER!!!!!)

    For their own safety, volunteers weren’t supposed to have a blood
    ammonia level higher than 50. But people were coming in with higher levels and
    without proper approval. The limit was raised to 70.
    When Jesse signed up over the summer, he was within the limits, but
    records show that when Penn doctors tested him, just days before the
    experiment, his reading was 114 — more than double the original safety limit.

    (That's way cool huh Peter???)

    HIGH FINANCIAL STAKES
    With so many red flags from the monkey deaths to the reactions in other
    volunteers, even to Jesse’s own ammonia levels, Why had Dr. Wilson’s team
    allowed the experiment to continue?

    (Wonder if Peter can answer this question?)

    At the University of Pennsylvania, the conflict committee approved Dr.
    Wilson’s arrangement with Genovo.
    In fact, the university itself owned a piece of his company and stood to
    profit, too.

    (Hmmmmmmmmm).

    In a statement, the university acknowledged that some information
    “should have been shared with the FDA sooner.”

    (Just a minor little slip,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)

    There was no information given to Jesse or his family about the monkey deaths.
    There was no information given to Jesse or his family about toxic results in
    prior patients. There was no information that would allow Jesse and his family
    to make any kind of informed decision.”

    (Peter STILL can't see any coverup!!!! NO dishonesty!)

    CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS

    He told congress that other private companies in the race for cures had
    also been doing gene therapy experiments and had also gotten adverse reactions.
    But instead of sharing the information, government rules allowed them to stamp
    those reactions “confidential,” classifying them as trade secrets to
    protect their research investments.
    So, while the government knew about them, other researchers like Dr.
    Wilson and volunteers like Jesse Gelsinger were never allowed to see them.

    (TRust the government!!!)

    “I was outraged,” says Paul. “I had a right to know. Jesse had a right to
    know.

    (Oh my,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,emotions).

    ***In February, the Food and Drug Administration said that because Dr. Wilson
    filed “false and misleading” reports and “repeatedly and deliberately
    violated regulations***

    REPEAT FOR THE HARD HEADED!!!

    Dr. Wilson filed “false and misleading” reports and “repeatedly and
    deliberately violated regulations

    (No coverups,,,,,,,,,,no fraud,,,,,,,,,,no deliberate violations,,,,,,,,,,,,)

    HOW DOES THAT GRAB YOU PETER BOWITCH?????

    This week marks the third anniversary of Jesse Gelsinger’s death. At
    the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Wilson

    ****is still on the faculty****

    (Soooooooooo in organized medicine,,,,,,,,,,,)

    ****Filing *false and misleading reports* is A OK,,,,,,,,,,,,****

    ****REPEATED and DELIBERATE violations,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,is A OK.***

    but no longer in charge of its gene therapy program. And, in Congress,
    lawmakers are still debating legislation to provide more protection for medical
    volunteers.

    ******in the end, whether Jesse was betrayed by the doctors he and his family
    thought they could trust.*********

    Jan

  3. Jan the Accuser said:
    Quoted message said:

    Or is that another of these things that nobody is allowed to know,
    like his original words containing the word "deliberately"?

    His *orginal* statement is not the issue.

    That's the way you'd like it to be.

    Because if the *original* statement were posted here

    everybody would see

    it was NOT a LIE

    and that I am NOT a LIAR

    and the one here who is a LIAR

    is the one who has FALSELY ACCUSED me

    is Jan Drew.

  4. In said:

    I believe he also states there is no mercury in amalgam.

    That is a TOTAL PROVEN LIE!!

    Yes, it is a total proven lie that he (Baratz) states
    that there is no mercury in amalgam.

    --
    | Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
    | it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
    | for new products or new versions of existing products." |
    end

  5. In said:

    It appears his website is gone.

    Another LIE from Jan:

    dcs@dragon tmp $ wget http://www.ncahf.org
    --10:46:47-- http://www.ncahf.org/
    => `index.html'
    Resolving www.ncahf.org... done.
    Connecting to www.ncahf.org[204.170.65.232]:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 15,750 [text/html]

    100%[====================================>] 15,750 18.76K/s ETA 00:00

    10:46:49 (18.76 KB/s) - `index.html' saved [15750/15750]

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.nachf.org/

    Oh, you mean Jan is LYING about the URL to the website of
    the The National Council Against Health Fraud?

    Typical.

    --
    | Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
    | it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
    | for new products or new versions of existing products." |
    end

  6. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 7/3/2003 9:02 PM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (Jan) said:

    >Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    >From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    >Date: 7/3/2003 3:31 AM Central Standard Time
    >Message-id: <[email hidden]>
    >
    >[email hidden] (Jan) wrote:
    >
    >>Not knowing when to shut up is how you landed in court.
    >
    >On which date did Mark Thorson go to court?

    I don't know and don't care.

    Why do you ask??

    I asked because you seem to be implying that he went to court. As I
    hadn't heard this, I thought you might know some details.

    Quoted message said:

    >Or is that another of these things that nobody is allowed to know,
    >like his original words containing the word "deliberately"?

    Poor Peter.

    Desperate.

    His *orginal* statement is not the issue.

    Pardon? His original statement is the only thing that matters

    No, I think not.

    His retraction matters.

    Othewise there would be no need to make it.

    Quoted message said:

    It is the only place where it could have been said (rather than implied)
    that something was done "deliberately".

    Simply absurd.

    Your rush to defend him, just makes that hole deeper and wider.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    He lies are plainly seen as well as yours and Peter Morans.

    Quoted message said:

    As I have never been given the opportunity to see his lies,

    Righto.

    Neither can you see Peter Moran's lies, neither have you known Baratz to


    lie,

    Quoted message said:

    and of course you can't explain your own.

    Quoted message said:

    I can't really comment on that. I have never seen Peter Moran tell a lie,


    so I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    don't really know what you are talking about there.

    Uh huh, and at this very moment, you are lying through your teeth.


    $ KaChing

  7. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    From: "D. C. Sessions" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/4/2003 12:45 PM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    In said:

    I believe he also states there is no mercury in amalgam.

    That is a TOTAL PROVEN LIE!!

    Yes, it is a total proven lie that he (Baratz) states
    that there is no mercury in amalgam.

    http://www.testfoundation.org/baratztestimony.htm

    (Sworn testimony of R. Baratz before the Florida Dental Board on amalgam rule,
    Sept 29, 2001)

    5. "The point is that dental amalgam does not contain mercury. It has none."
    (page 7)
    ============================
    "To allege that there is no mercury in mercury amalgam as Dr. Baratz has done
    in his sworn testimony before the Florida Dental Board is either a reflection
    of ignorence, or intent to deceive."

    Sincerely,

    Ralph Dougherty Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State Univ.

  8. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    From: "D. C. Sessions" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/4/2003 12:48 PM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    In said:

    It appears his website is gone.

    Another LIE from Jan:

    It appears to be a typo from were I copied it.

    http://www.nachf

    Sorry, you will have to do better.

    Jan

  9. (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    From: "D. C. Sessions" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/4/2003 12:48 PM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    In said:

    It appears his website is gone.

    Another LIE from Jan:

    It appears to be a typo from were I copied it.

    http://www.nachf

    Sorry, you will have to do better.

    Jan

    Perhaps I should go back to the archives to see where Jan first posted
    this incorrect URL for the purpose of showing that the NCAHF web site
    (not Dr Baratz's web site) no longer existed. When I pointed out the
    mistake, I said that she couldn't claim "typo" because she had
    commented on the string of characters as typed.

    Or I could go back to the archives where Jan posted the incorrect URL
    for the second time, and show where I commented that she had already
    been told that it was incorrect, so she should not still be using it
    to disparage Dr Baratz.

    But why should I bother? If someone cannot be convinced that a word in
    use in 1646 could not possibly have been invented about 180 years
    later to describe something that only started to happen in about 1830,
    or cannot be convinced that quoting a statement which cites another
    statement as "implying" something is not the same as quoting the
    original statement, or ...

    --
    Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight

  10. In said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Repeating the Repeated Repeatedly
    From: "D. C. Sessions" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/4/2003 12:45 PM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    In said:

    I believe he also states there is no mercury in amalgam.

    That is a TOTAL PROVEN LIE!!

    Yes, it is a total proven lie that he (Baratz) states
    that there is no mercury in amalgam.

    http://www.testfoundation.org/baratztestimony.htm

    (Sworn testimony of R. Baratz before the Florida Dental Board on amalgam rule,
    Sept 29, 2001)

    That's another lie. That site isn't the sworn testimony of
    Dr. Baratz, it's a polemical site dedicated to impugning him.
    How about the actual testimony, Jan.

    Of course you can't.

    --
    | Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
    | it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
    | for new products or new versions of existing products." |
    end

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.