General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: red meat and longevity??

Started by RBR · · Last activity · 29 posts · 1,075 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
7 September 2005
Last activity
29 September 2005
Original author
RBR
Posts
29
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,075
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 29
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Jerry Story said:

    Here you can download 6 free mp3s. Dr. Wallach is a fast smooth speaker
    with lots of information. Or is it mis-information?
    http://www.american-longevity.net/freetape.htm
    He says that veg*nism doesn't work.
    He says that a study showed that all the very old people ate red meat
    at least twice a day.

    What's with the red meat?

    Actually, in a centenarian study where approximately 1,300
    centenarians were studied, they found all types of diets were
    followed. Only four of the centenarians were vegetarians.

    Also, below is an excerpt from an article I found at the BBC site on
    the subject of the benefits of less meat in our diet:

    "But completely avoiding meat was not the healthiest diet, the
    researchers found.

    For every 100 deaths among vegans, there were 66 among vegetarians and
    60 among occasional meat eaters."

    Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2838083.stm

    Vegetarianism is not conducive to longevity despite what the
    vegetarian animal rights activists tell you. A healthy omnivorous diet
    is much more conducive to a long and healthy life however.

    RBR

  2. RBR said:

    Actually, in a centenarian study where approximately 1,300
    centenarians were studied, they found all types of diets were
    followed. Only four of the centenarians were vegetarians.

    Newsflash: Diet, and therefore nutrition, is not very important when
    it comes to longevity.

    Jack LaLanne said this some 50 years ago, without the benefit of any
    research study. Exercise is King. Nutrition is Queen. And, together
    they make a Kingdom.

    Just thought that the 'One Knee Wonder' might want to know.

  3. WHO HAS THE SHORTEST LIFE EXPECTANCY IN THE WORLD?
    The Inuit of Alaska, Greenland, Iceland have the shortest life
    expectancies in the world and have had for over 150 years. It is rare
    for an Inuit male eating only animal protein and fat to live over the
    late 50's. Conversely the longest life expectancies are in the
    centenarian vegetarian tribes
    (Villcabamba of Ecuador, Hunzas of Tibet, Azerbaijans of the Caucusus,
    monasteries in India). (Source: National Geographic Jan 73)
    http://www.veganmd.org

    Who loves ya.
    Tom

    Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
    http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com

    Man Is A Herbivore!
    http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore

    DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
    http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking

  4. Quoted message said:

    WHO HAS THE SHORTEST LIFE EXPECTANCY IN THE WORLD?
    The Inuit of Alaska, Greenland, Iceland have the shortest life
    expectancies in the world and have had for over 150 years.

    There are mo Inuit in Iceland and there never were.

  5. RBR said:
    Jerry Story said:

    Here you can download 6 free mp3s. Dr. Wallach is a fast smooth speaker
    with lots of information. Or is it mis-information?
    http://www.american-longevity.net/freetape.htm
    He says that veg*nism doesn't work.
    He says that a study showed that all the very old people ate red meat
    at least twice a day.

    What's with the red meat?

    Actually, in a centenarian study where approximately 1,300
    centenarians were studied, they found all types of diets were
    followed. Only four of the centenarians were vegetarians.

    Also, below is an excerpt from an article I found at the BBC site on
    the subject of the benefits of less meat in our diet:

    "But completely avoiding meat was not the healthiest diet, the
    researchers found.

    For every 100 deaths among vegans, there were 66 among vegetarians and
    60 among occasional meat eaters."

    Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2838083.stm

    Vegetarianism is not conducive to longevity despite what the
    vegetarian animal rights activists tell you. A healthy omnivorous diet
    is much more conducive to a long and healthy life however.

    RBR

    Wow.

    This is good stuff!!!!! Thanks. Now I have some real numbers that are
    simple to understand when I have this talk with people over and over
    again through the years.

    Just don't share this information with women you are trying to get in
    bed because telling them the truth about the world will always turn
    them off. Instead, ask them about their experiences with ghosts and
    tell them you are not so sure if they exist or not but this one time
    ....

    William

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    RBR said:
    Jerry Story said:

    Here you can download 6 free mp3s. Dr. Wallach is a fast smooth speaker
    with lots of information. Or is it mis-information?
    http://www.american-longevity.net/freetape.htm
    He says that veg*nism doesn't work.
    He says that a study showed that all the very old people ate red meat
    at least twice a day.

    What's with the red meat?

    Actually, in a centenarian study where approximately 1,300
    centenarians were studied, they found all types of diets were
    followed. Only four of the centenarians were vegetarians.

    Also, below is an excerpt from an article I found at the BBC site on
    the subject of the benefits of less meat in our diet:

    "But completely avoiding meat was not the healthiest diet, the
    researchers found.

    For every 100 deaths among vegans, there were 66 among vegetarians and
    60 among occasional meat eaters."

    Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2838083.stm

    Vegetarianism is not conducive to longevity despite what the
    vegetarian animal rights activists tell you. A healthy omnivorous diet
    is much more conducive to a long and healthy life however.

    RBR

    Wow.

    With regard to: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2838083.stm
    read the whole thing, William, especially the first part. Note
    the headline: Less meat 'means a longer life' Try a little wine
    and sweet talk for your next seduction.

    Less meat 'means a longer life'
    Eating little or no meat can help people live longer, researchers have
    found.
    Their lives are "significantly longer" than the general population,
    researchers have found, according to German scientists.

    It has been suggested that eating a balanced vegetarian diet could reduce
    the risk of developing certain cancers and heart disease, cut cholesterol
    levels and the chances of suffering from kidney and gall stones,
    diet-related diabetes and high blood pressure.

    A team from the Centre of Cancer Research in Germany monitored almost 2,000
    people aged between 10 and 70, who ate either no meat, or less than average
    between 1978 and 1999.

    Essentially, the key issue here is having a properly balanced diet
    Dr Jenny Chang-Claude, Centre of Cancer Research

    Those studied were either vegans, who eat no meat, fish, eggs or dairy
    products, vegetarians, who eat eggs and dairy products, but no meat or fish,
    and occasional meat eaters.
    Across the group, there was an average of 59 deaths for every 100 deaths in
    that age range in the general population during that period.

    Exercise

    But completely avoiding meat was not the healthiest diet, the researchers
    found.

    For every 100 deaths among vegans, there were 66 among vegetarians and 60
    among occasional meat eaters.

    Amongst smokers, the mortality rate was 70% higher than non-smokers, while
    those who took the most exercise reduced their mortality rates by more than
    30%.

    Moderate alcohol made no discernible difference to lifespan, the researchers
    concluded.

    Dr Jenny Chang-Claude, of the Centre of Cancer Research, said: "Essentially,
    the key issue here is having a properly balanced diet."

    Story from BBC NEWS:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/2838083.stm

    Published: 2003/03/10 18:42:02 GMT

    © BBC MMV

  7. George Cherry said:

    M1TE&.#EAHP`B`+,``/___RHJ*@```(Z.CA04%&UM;41$1,C(R.SL[*6EI;N[
    MN]W=W?/S\PH*"OCX^/S\_"'Y! ``````+ ````"C`"(```3_$,A)J[TXZ\V[
    M_V HCF1IGFBJKFSKOG LSW1MWS.A[WSOZX&#)/$K&A.20\#(Y UP4(!@2JU:
    MK].&8HCM>I^ @W=L+41QY#1!"$BDT^ #X3TVGVW61L# YP?&:UQ6>WT&?V-Q

    I would add:
    M<UT$A(8-6'85"PH+&PH*"!,'EYR=`)-;&😉-L%YND``H#JID7@PL.#+$,"PD%
    MBVQN50T)L+*3MEV)6 8)!PP3"*D&91<#`@25&5.A`,M=85-(%X?1%0AS8 F'
    M5)$4@ZP5#LY7@6UYVA4/`X]7PE4$`^@/#Q0(XP+E)JP+@,["M G6L$CX$S )

    And, do not forget that:
    M%3 5UF520(6/HE95`E1:4*!C@F,(_Q)2:9>+RBX`#CH6R"<!F!5[4PB$2E;
    MD($"F #\:PA@G8 `T@106V8@@T0++H%:8"AAF4:!!#!2>2KG(3^?(W&]`X"@
    MB@%^"NA5@7DRC,BIXJKPQ,I3BE"$`HIB^"8`H@2ZP. Y?.M6;QBI4Z@JBGL,

    Montygram wrote:
    M:TRMNI PR)CI@-B'2087<!!F<😉JU<8'Q/-@TK@9;2@5.">F9`N@)4^P&G5JI
    MZI0"^UQF%6022=>*E VGCDS%]EDRF(M:4^UV:&D,8O@N!-AS2C<`X."VT^#J
    MD\T"F1(\/DP[B^(^!5K_@UPY<&LZY)IY]I>M`N=JQS$PW1LJNH2C>^L6-)@Q

    But he don't know what he is talking about because obviously:

    M6BQ^GXS'G?\[B4D@RUV_[59>7/R41$=P=\TQ77'2%<😉'.?B=UM)/< 6D@"(!
    M^&5.?Q+L\P!ER?Q&TE8`F$B9`PH4L%U=O)6F&W#JR54>`>B\EV!\=#T1I";M
    M+?#>! LDU%9U"*BT4B6DW8-8;[email hidden] E#,BFH&L&4$81>LQ9X(R.!!(D@8\_

    Just my opinion, but try to prove me wrong. :

  8. Mr-Natural-Health said:
    RBR said:

    Actually, in a centenarian study where approximately 1,300
    centenarians were studied, they found all types of diets were
    followed. Only four of the centenarians were vegetarians.

    Newsflash: Diet, and therefore nutrition, is not very important when
    it comes to longevity.

    Jack LaLanne said this some 50 years ago, without the benefit of any
    research study. Exercise is King. Nutrition is Queen. And, together
    they make a Kingdom.

    Just thought that the 'One Knee Wonder' might want to know.

    Damnit. Something is wrong. I have to agree with you.... 🙂

    Mirek

  9. This study is not taking into consideration the percentage of
    vegetarians and vegans in the population, which is only a minority. You
    should expect them to be only a very small part of centarians. Also 100
    years ago vegetarians were really oddballs whereas they have become
    much more common in the past 20 years.

    Angie

  10. "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Who loves ya.
    Tom

    Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
    http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com

    Did he preach vegeterianism , if so why the christains
    are basically meat lovers ?

    Kam

    --
    Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

  11. Only 4? That is 40%, and vegetarians don't make up anywhere near 40%
    of the population. But it's a good point, namely, that avoiding
    oxidative stress is the key, so you can eat meat, espeically if you
    boil it, don't eat too much of it, and eat it with antioxidants (such
    as herbs and spices).

  12. "montygram" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Only 4? That is 40%, and vegetarians don't make up anywhere near 40%
    of the population. But it's a good point, namely, that avoiding
    oxidative stress is the key, so you can eat meat, espeically if you
    boil it,

    Boil it? Now that's a nice back door approach to get people to give up
    meat. Yes Ms. Waittress I'll take the 12 Oz. NY cut and boil it for a
    hour. Spock, beam him up!

    -DF

  13. Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:08:08 +0300 in article
    <[email hidden]> Matti Narkia

    Quoted message said:

    7 Sep 2005 19:48:12 -0700 in article
    <[email hidden]>

    Quoted post said:

    WHO HAS THE SHORTEST LIFE EXPECTANCY IN THE WORLD?
    The Inuit of Alaska, Greenland, Iceland have the shortest life
    expectancies in the world and have had for over 150 years.

    Please provide some references to support this claim. You must have some
    statistics about the life expectancy of inuit to make such a claim.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It is rare
    for an Inuit male eating only animal protein and fat to live over the
    late 50's. Conversely the longest life expectancies are in the
    centenarian vegetarian tribes
    (Villcabamba of Ecuador, Hunzas of Tibet, Azerbaijans of the Caucusus,
    monasteries in India). (Source: National Geographic Jan 73)
    http://www.veganmd.org


    There are no inuit in Iceland. Traditional inuit's leading causes of death
    were accidents and infectious diseases. Their life was full of dangers and
    medical care was poor. But they had less chronic degenerative diseases such
    as coronary heart disease, cancer and diabetes than any other tribe or
    country.

    According to the page

    Leading Cause of Death for Inuit (Percentage) 1988-1993
    <http://www.itk.ca/health/cancer-registry-graph01.php>

    the most common cause of death for inuit in 1988-1993 was accidents (28%).
    In earlier times, when life was even more dangerous, the percentage could
    have been even higher.

    Information about the health of inuit can be found for example from the
    following web pages and references:

    ScienCentral: Native Diet
    sciencentral.comview.php3

    "... Scientists studying the Inuit in the 1970s found that
    as a group, they suffered much less than their European
    counterparts from certain diseases, such as coronary heart
    disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetes mellitus. Yet
    their diet was very high in fat from eating foods like
    whale, seal, and salmon. Discover Magazine called this the
    "Inuit Paradox."

    The solution to the paradox may lie in the fact that not
    all fat is created equal. "[The Inuit] ate a lot of marine
    animals, like walruses and seals, whales and so forth, and
    the blubber of these animals is a very high source of
    monounsaturated fat,"says Cordain. "So if you contrast the
    Inuit diet to the Western diet, it actually turns out to
    be lower in saturated fat— very high in fat, but high in
    healthful fat, monounsaturates and polyunsaturates, high
    in a specific type of polyunsaturates called omega-3 fatty
    acids that come from the marine food chain."

    Cordain says that while the Inuit diet is not optimal,
    there are a few things we can learn from it. "Let's take
    the good of the Inuit, the lean protein, the good
    fats…minimize refined cereal, the refined sugars, and
    increase the fruit and vegetables in our diet," he says,
    adding that the single most important thing we can do in
    our diets is increase the omega-3 fatty acids, which are
    found in many oily fish. ..."

    The Inuit Paradox
    How can people who gorge on fat and rarely see a vegetable be healthier than
    we are?
    By Patricia Gadsby
    Photography by Leon Steele
    DISCOVER Vol. 25 No. 10 | October 2004 | Biology & Medicine
    <http://www.discover.com/issues/oct-04/features/inuit-paradox/>

    Orsoq
    Eat Meat and Blubber from Sea Mammals and avoid Cardiovascular disease.
    <http://www.highnorth.no/Library/Culture/or-ea-me.htm>

    O'Keefe JH Jr, Harris WS.
    From Inuit to implementation: omega-3 fatty acids come of age.
    Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Jun;75(6):607-14. Review.
    PMID: 10852422 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=10852422>

    "During the past 25 years, the cardiovascular effects of
    marine omega-3 (omega-3) fatty acids have been the subject
    of increasing investigation. In the late 1970s,
    epidemiological studies revealed that Greenland Inuits had
    substantially reduced rates of acute myocardial infarction
    compared with Western control subjects. These observations
    generated more than 4,500 studies to explore this and
    other effects of omega-3 fatty acids on human metabolism
    and health. From epidemiology to cell culture and animal
    studies to randomized controlled trials, the
    cardioprotective effects of omega-3 fatty acids are
    becoming recognized. ..."

    Bjerregaard P, Mulvad G, Pedersen HS.
    Cardiovascular risk factors in Inuit of Greenland.
    Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Dec;26(6):1182-90.
    PMID: 9447397 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9447397>
    <http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/26/6/1182>

    "... CONCLUSIONS: In spite of an increased westernization of the
    Greenlanders' lifestyle and a high prevalence of several cardiovascular
    risk factors, mortality from IHD is still low. ..."

    Henzen C.
    [Fish oil--healing principle in the Eskimo diet?]
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1995 Jan 3;84(1):11-5. German.
    PMID: 7839038 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=7839038>

    "The low incidence of coronary heart disease among Eskimos
    is related to their diet rich in marine fatty acids, which
    contain large amounts of polyunsaturated omega-3 fatty
    acids, mainly eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids.
    The beneficial effects on atherosclerotic vascular disease
    result from favorable influence on
    prostaglandin/thromboxane metabolism. Clinical studies
    have also reported antiinflammatory effects."

    Feskens EJ, Kromhout D.
    Epidemiologic studies on Eskimos and fish intake.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Jun 14;683:9-15. Review.
    PMID: 8352476 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=8352476>

    "Chronic diseases such as coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus
    are uncommon in Eskimos. ..."

    Dyerberg J.
    Coronary heart disease in Greenland Inuit: a paradox. Implications for
    western diet patterns.
    Arctic Med Res. 1989 Apr;48(2):47-54.
    PMID: 2736000 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=2736000>

    "Epidemiologic examinations of Greenland Inuit have
    disclosed a connection between high seafood intake
    containing a high level of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids
    (PUFAs) and a low coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity.
    Other epidemiologic studies have confirmed this
    interrelation, and a biological substrate for a causal
    relationship has been established. This includes a lipid
    lowering effect of n-3 PUFAs and a modulatory effect on
    eicosanoid metabolism, shifting platelet vessel wall
    balance in an antithrombotic direction. Other metabolic
    effects of n-3 PUFAs are an altered inflammatory response
    to proinflammatory stimuli and a modest hypotensive
    effect. These findings create a basis for controlled
    clinical studies and justify, in the author's opinion,
    both a mass strategy of advocating that a well-balanced
    diet should include a higher use of seafood in Western
    diets, and a more intensive recommendation of n-3 PUFAs in
    certain high-risk patients with a heterogeneous risk-
    factor profile. Among these, patients with essential
    hypertension and patients undergoing reconstructive
    coronary intervention are obvious candidates. A major
    outcome of the research, stemming from the epidemiological
    studies, is establishment of the fact that separate
    attention should be paid to both the n-6 and the n-3 fatty
    acids."

    --
    Matti Narkia

  14. On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:45:44 GMT, "Doug Freese" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "montygram" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Only 4? That is 40%, and vegetarians don't make up anywhere near 40%
    of the population. But it's a good point, namely, that avoiding
    oxidative stress is the key, so you can eat meat, espeically if you
    boil it,

    Boil it? Now that's a nice back door approach to get people to give up
    meat. Yes Ms. Waittress I'll take the 12 Oz. NY cut and boil it for a
    hour. Spock, beam him up!

    -DF

    I love fondue steak. Just boil it in some peanut oil, can't beat the
    taste.

  15. jt said:

    On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:45:44 GMT, "Doug Freese" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "montygram" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Only 4? That is 40%, and vegetarians don't make up anywhere near 40%
    of the population. But it's a good point, namely, that avoiding
    oxidative stress is the key, so you can eat meat, espeically if you
    boil it,

    Boil it? Now that's a nice back door approach to get people to give up
    meat. Yes Ms. Waittress I'll take the 12 Oz. NY cut and boil it for a
    hour. Spock, beam him up!

    -DF

    I love fondue steak. Just boil it in some peanut oil, can't beat the
    taste.

    and it cooks in 1-2 minutes not an hour.

  16. Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:05:30 +0300 in article
    <[email hidden]> Matti Narkia

    Quoted message said:

    Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:08:08 +0300 in article
    <[email hidden]> Matti Narkia

    Quoted message said:

    7 Sep 2005 19:48:12 -0700 in article
    <[email hidden]>

    Quoted post said:

    WHO HAS THE SHORTEST LIFE EXPECTANCY IN THE WORLD?
    The Inuit of Alaska, Greenland, Iceland have the shortest life
    expectancies in the world and have had for over 150 years.

    Please provide some references to support this claim. You must have some
    statistics about the life expectancy of inuit to make such a claim.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It is rare
    for an Inuit male eating only animal protein and fat to live over the
    late 50's. Conversely the longest life expectancies are in the
    centenarian vegetarian tribes
    (Villcabamba of Ecuador, Hunzas of Tibet, Azerbaijans of the Caucusus,
    monasteries in India). (Source: National Geographic Jan 73)
    http://www.veganmd.org


    There are no inuit in Iceland. Traditional inuit's leading causes of death
    were accidents and infectious diseases. Their life was full of dangers and
    medical care was poor. But they had less chronic degenerative diseases such
    as coronary heart disease, cancer and diabetes than any other tribe or
    country.

    According to the page

    Leading Cause of Death for Inuit (Percentage) 1988-1993
    <http://www.itk.ca/health/cancer-registry-graph01.php>

    the most common cause of death for inuit in 1988-1993 was accidents (28%).
    In earlier times, when life was even more dangerous, the percentage could
    have been even higher.


    The link

    <http://www.prcdc.org/summaries/amindiansaknatives/amindiansaknatives.html>

    provided by Dr. Harris tells, among other things, that U.S. overall
    mortality due to accidents is only 4%. So inuit are 7 times more likely to
    die in accident than an average American citizen.

    --
    Matti Narkia

  17. "jt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I love fondue steak. Just boil it in some peanut oil, can't beat the
    taste.

    and it cooks in 1-2 minutes not an hour.

    Hmm, boil in oil. Other than a few degrees difference in temp, what is
    the difference between deep frying or boiling in oil. My narrow
    definition of "boiling", especially with food, is with water, which
    sounds from a flavor aspect, gross. Is there some real or imagined
    health difference/benefit between boiling vs frying in oil?

    -DF

  18. On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:37:21 GMT, "Doug Freese" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "jt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I love fondue steak. Just boil it in some peanut oil, can't beat the
    taste.

    and it cooks in 1-2 minutes not an hour.

    Hmm, boil in oil. Other than a few degrees difference in temp, what is
    the difference between deep frying or boiling in oil. My narrow
    definition of "boiling", especially with food, is with water, which
    sounds from a flavor aspect, gross. Is there some real or imagined
    health difference/benefit between boiling vs frying in oil?

    -DF

    Well fondue sounds more sophisticated I suppose and the food is done
    with a fork not just thorwing a whole turkey or whatever in the pot.
    frying means to cook food (non-submerged) in hot fat or oil over
    moderate to high heat, very similar to sauteing. Fodue is submerged
    so is deep frying.

    I am hoping when he was referring to boiling a steak he did not mean
    water.

  19. How the Quality of Your Drinking Water can help Prevent Heart Disease
    and Cancer!

    Independent 3RD party scientific research supports x2o water
    enhancement product!

    http://www.healthywater.com is a web site that belongs to Martin
    Fox, Ph.D. and is not associated with Xooma World Wide or it’s water
    enhancement product, X2O. Dr. Fox’s web site is a scientific research
    web site in which he answers the following questions.

    1. What is the best liquid to hydrate your body?
    2. How can your drinking water prevent heart disease?
    3. Which minerals in drinking water help prevent cancer?
    4. Is chlorine safe for you?

    Dr. Fox’s conclusions are based on numerous references that are
    listed on his web site as well as animal studies that provide
    compelling evidence. Click on http://www.healthywater.com to find out
    more about this very informative web site.

    Dr Fox concluded that:
    1. Many of our health problems are due to Dehydration.
    * X2O sachets actually make water “wetter” by lowering the
    surface tension of water molecules. This dramatically increases your
    water’s ability to hydrate your body at the cellular level.
    2. Hard water, that is water with calcium and magnesium, helps prevent
    Heart Disease.
    * X2O Sachets contain calcium and magnesium and over 70 trace
    minerals. These essential minerals (electrolytes) become ionic in
    water allowing them to be absorbed quickly and easily by your body.
    3. Minerals and a high PH level (above 7.0) can help to prevent Cancer.
    *X2O transforms your water into a powerful alkaline
    beverage with a PH level of 9.9+, which fights against the physical
    stress caused by today’s fast-paced lifestyles.
    4. Chlorine, in your drinking water, causes both Heart Disease and
    Cancer.
    *X2O instantly removes chlorine from your drinking water,
    see the demo on my web site.

    To view my personal web site click on
    http://www.myhealthywater.com

    or call Ted Searight (201) 342-3863

  20. On 7 Sep 2005 15:36:38 -0700, "Mr-Natural-Health"
    <[email hidden]> babbled on:

    Quoted message said:


    RBR said:

    Actually, in a centenarian study where approximately 1,300
    centenarians were studied, they found all types of diets were
    followed. Only four of the centenarians were vegetarians.

    Newsflash: Diet, and therefore nutrition, is not very important when
    it comes to longevity.

    Perhaps if you would concentrate ... :o(

    Vegetarians and vegans in particular make rash claims that their diet
    is conducive to longevity. That has yet to proven. Vegetarian
    religionists sometimes need to slapped upside the head to bring them
    back to reality. You, on the other hand, need to be slapped upside the
    head simply because you are you .... :o)

    Quoted message said:

    Jack LaLanne said this some 50 years ago, without the benefit of any
    research study. Exercise is King. Nutrition is Queen. And, together
    they make a Kingdom.

    Jack is your hero? Does Jack know you're a major [censored]? I don't
    think Jack would like to be associated with a major dumbass like you
    Mr. "Health". It would not be good for business.

    Just thought you would want to know, since you know I *am* right. :o)

    Quoted message said:

    Just thought that the 'One Knee Wonder' might want to know.

    So sayeth the American Dental Association spokesman.

    RBR

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.