Re: Rampant Hate and Lies

[censored].

She has considered nothing.

She hates children, as she opposes everything that is good for them.

"rodney_victor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

If Jan posts the URL of an anti-vaccination site, it means that she
hates vaccinations. That's all that you can logically conclude if she
posts the URL to an anti-vaccination site. You cannot use that fact to
conclude that she hates children. In fact, all the evidence points to
the fact that she loves children. And no doubt it is because of her
love for children that she wants to save them from the dangers of
vaccinations.

Some evidently think (or are being paid to say) that vaccinations are
good for children, but Jan has considered the evidence and she has
come to the opposite conclusion. She is perfectly entitled to her
opinion that it's not in the best interests of young children to have
the blood and pus of sick horses, along with some mercury and various
other chemicals, pumped into their bloodstreams.

I have a great deal of admiration for Jan, who is subjected to the
most terrible abuse in this newsgroup day after day for standing up
for her convictions in the face of the almost overwhelming power of
the medical establishment. I'm sure that her dedication has helped
many people to find simple, natural remedies for their complaints,
rather than the drugs that are pushed by the licenced drug-pushers.

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

I have a couple of verses to encourage you:

"Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith,
who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame,
and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. Consider him who
endured such opposition from sinful men, so that you will not grow
weary and lose heart." (Heb 12:2-3)

In article <[email hidden]>,

rodney_victor said:

If Jan posts the URL of an anti-vaccination site, it means that she
hates vaccinations. That's all that you can logically conclude if she
posts the URL to an anti-vaccination site. You cannot use that fact to
conclude that she hates children. In fact, all the evidence points to
the fact that she loves children. And no doubt it is because of her
love for children that she wants to save them from the dangers of
vaccinations.

Why doesn't she want to save them from the dangers of vaccine-
preventable diseases? The odds of harm from the disease (with
the possible exception of chicken pox) are much higher than the
odds of harm from the vaccine.

Quoted message said:

Some evidently think (or are being paid to say) that vaccinations are
good for children, but Jan has considered the evidence and she has
come to the opposite conclusion.

It's highly questionable that she has done anything of the sort. She
shows no evidence of it. She shows a lot of evidence of knee-jerk
reaction to anything in conventional medicine -- she labels it "bad."
This is not a sign of "considering the evidence." Quite the contrary.

Quoted message said:

She is perfectly entitled to her opinion that it's not in the best
interests of young children to have the blood and pus of sick horses,
along with some mercury and various other chemicals, pumped into
their bloodstreams.

Except that's not what's in most vaccines, especially the mercury.
So such an objection is meaningless.

Quoted message said:

I have a great deal of admiration for Jan, who is subjected to the
most terrible abuse in this newsgroup day after day for standing up
for her convictions in the face of the almost overwhelming power of
the medical establishment.

Many of the people who are critical of Jan are not part of the
"medical establishment." And sticking by one's guns in a wrong-
headed attitude is not a virtue. Sincerity is highly overrated.

Quoted message said:

I'm sure that her dedication has helped many people to find simple,
natural remedies for their complaints, rather than the drugs that are
pushed by the licenced drug-pushers.

I doubt that she has done anything of the sort, since most of her
tirades are not directed towards helping others find salvation through
"natural" cures (a questionable term). Most of them are about the
evils of mercury and the awfulness of conventional medicine.

Quoted message said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

Who says she's standing for the truth? Just because you think God is
on your side doesn't mean anything. If both teams playing in a
football game pray before the game, only one of them is still going to
win. Does God hate the losing team?

Quoted message said:

Consider him who endured such opposition from sinful men, so that you
will not grow weary and lose heart." (Heb 12:2-3)

Irrelevant. She's not trying to save our souls, she's trying to abuse
us (and succeeding).

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:45:17 GMT, [email hidden] (David

Wright) said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

rodney_victor said:

If Jan posts the URL of an anti-vaccination site, it means that she
hates vaccinations. That's all that you can logically conclude if she
posts the URL to an anti-vaccination site. You cannot use that fact to
conclude that she hates children. In fact, all the evidence points to
the fact that she loves children. And no doubt it is because of her
love for children that she wants to save them from the dangers of
vaccinations.

Why doesn't she want to save them from the dangers of vaccine-
preventable diseases?

That is an easy question. Jan is so [censored] at conventional medicine
for not indulging her somatic hypervigilance and delusions that she is
obsessed with demonizing conventional medicine. Since vaccines are
part of conventional medicine Jan Drew has little choice but to focus
obsessively about the negative aspects of vaccination while completely
ignoring the millions of children who die each year from vaccine
preventable diseases. She has been confronted about this many times
and has not responded.

Jan could not give a rat's ass about children unless she can use a
child's death to support her anticonventional medicine agenda. This
has been clearly demonstrated by her posts. She ONLY posts children's
deaths if they die do to conventional medicine errors. She completely
ignores the millions of children who did of vaccine preventable
diseases.

If Jan Drew's behavior is seen as loving children I would hate to see
how she would behave is she hated them.

Quoted message said:

The odds of harm from the disease (with
the possible exception of chicken pox) are much higher than the
odds of harm from the vaccine.

Cue Jan to say that if your child was damaged by vaccine you would not
feel this way.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Some evidently think (or are being paid to say) that vaccinations are
good for children, but Jan has considered the evidence and she has
come to the opposite conclusion.

It's highly questionable that she has done anything of the sort. She
shows no evidence of it. She shows a lot of evidence of knee-jerk
reaction to anything in conventional medicine -- she labels it "bad."
This is not a sign of "considering the evidence." Quite the contrary.

Actually when Jan is asked directly about vaccines she says that she
is not against them. She also says that she thinks that the most
difficult decision that a parent must make is the decision to
vaccinate their children. It is clear that Jan realizes that
vaccinations may be helpful (compared to her opinion about dental
amalgams).

However she obsessively posts antivac whacko sites due to her
obsessive need to demonize CM. You see her need to demonize CM clearly
outweighs the damage done to millions of children around the world.
Jan Drew's priorities are obvious. Her first priority is to rail
against CM. Anything else is secondary.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

Who says she's standing for the truth? Just because you think God is
on your side doesn't mean anything. If both teams playing in a
football game pray before the game, only one of them is still going to
win. Does God hate the losing team?

He obviously hates the Red Sox and Cubs.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Consider him who endured such opposition from sinful men, so that you
will not grow weary and lose heart." (Heb 12:2-3)

Irrelevant. She's not trying to save our souls, she's trying to abuse
us (and succeeding).

Actually she is not trying to abuse anyone even though abuse is a
byproduct of her psychosis, delusions, somatic hypervigilance. She is
one sick cookie and in this group she has enough enablers to keep her
from getting well.

Aloha,

Rich

Quoted message said:

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------

The best defense to logic is ignorance.

"David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

rodney_victor said:

If Jan posts the URL of an anti-vaccination site, it means that she
hates vaccinations. That's all that you can logically conclude if she
posts the URL to an anti-vaccination site. You cannot use that fact to
conclude that she hates children. In fact, all the evidence points to
the fact that she loves children. And no doubt it is because of her
love for children that she wants to save them from the dangers of
vaccinations.

Why doesn't she want to save them from the dangers of vaccine-
preventable diseases? The odds of harm from the disease (with
the possible exception of chicken pox) are much higher than the
odds of harm from the vaccine.

Even one of Wakefield's colleagues is not saying that there is NO autism
link, and that the risk for the disease is far greater.

Why is Jan silent on this????

(rodney_victor) said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

I have a couple of verses to encourage you:

And here's another:

But I learned to accept it
Accept it with pride
For you don't count the dead
When God's on your side

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: [email hidden] (rodney_victor)
Date: 10/31/2003 6:07 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

If Jan posts the URL of an anti-vaccination site, it means that she
hates vaccinations

I have expressed otherwise.

You have judged incorrectly.

Quoted message said:

That's all that you can logically conclude if she
posts the URL to an anti-vaccination site

You conclude wrong and evidently haven't read some of my posts.

Quoted message said:

You cannot use that fact to
conclude that she hates children. In fact, all the evidence points to
the fact that she loves children. And no doubt it is because of her
love for children that she wants to save them from the dangers of
vaccinations.

Quoted message said:

Some evidently think (or are being paid to say) that vaccinations are
good for children, but Jan has considered the evidence and she has
come to the opposite conclusion

Wrong again.

Quoted message said:

She is perfectly entitled to her
opinion that it's not in the best interests of young children to have
the blood and pus of sick horses, along with some mercury and various
other chemicals, pumped into their bloodstreams.

Quoted message said:

I have a great deal of admiration for Jan, who is subjected to the
most terrible abuse in this newsgroup day after day for standing up
for her convictions in the face of the almost overwhelming power of
the medical establishment. I'm sure that her dedication has helped
many people to find simple, natural remedies for their complaints,

rather than the drugs that are pushed by the licenced drug-pushers.

Quoted message said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

Correct.

Quoted message said:

I have a couple of verses to encourage you:

"Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith,
who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame,
and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. Consider him who
endured such opposition from sinful

men, so that you will not grow

Quoted message said:

weary and lose heart." (Heb 12:2-3)

Thank you for the kind words, the debunkers are angry because they have failed
to run me off, as is their practice. They are also agry, they can't get by with
lying, and they are agry, they can't beat me down.

Now, let's clear up the vaccination thing. I just posted this recently.

From: Jan ([email hidden])
Subject: Re: Opportunity for better health
View: Complete Thread (10 articles)
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2003-10-08 19:16:25 PST

Peter Bowditch wrote:

<snip>

And she opposes vaccination.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Cue Jan to ask me to c&p the exact word "oppose".

I wrote:

Why did you use the word??

Quoted message said:

Because it was the appropriate word to use.

Well, no it was not.

Previously I stated:

Quoted message said:

I can see both sides, but to dismiss the high increase of autism after the

shot
is not realistic. I'm glad my kids are raised, and my heart goes out to all the
parents who must make a decision.

Quoted message said:

Do you oppose vaccination?

Not generally, no. What I oppose is all the *LIES* , the *DENIAL*, the vested
interest, the sealing of documents of side effects. The public has a right to
know.

I also oppose the use of thimerosal.

I oppose the MMR. three shots in one that I believe overwhelms a young body.

I oppose those who would try to take away the right to choose. I oppose all
the names parents are called, who decide not to vaccinate their kids. I oppose
that they are called stupid and anti-vaccnation liars.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

To make a total of three lies and divert from David?

Is it a lie that you oppose vaccination?

YES!!

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 10/31/2003 11:45 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

In article <[email hidden]>,

rodney_victor said:

If Jan posts the URL of an anti-vaccination site, it means that she
hates vaccinations. That's all that you can logically conclude if she
posts the URL to an anti-vaccination site. You cannot use that fact to
conclude that she hates children. In fact, all the evidence points to
the fact that she loves children. And no doubt it is because of her
love for children that she wants to save them from the dangers of
vaccinations.

Why doesn't she want to save them from the dangers of vaccine-
preventable diseases? The odds of harm from the disease (with
the possible exception of chicken pox) are much higher than the
odds of harm from the vaccine.

Quoted message said:

Some evidently think (or are being paid to say) that vaccinations are
good for children, but Jan has considered the evidence and she has
come to the opposite conclusion.

It's highly questionable that she has done anything of the sort. She
shows no evidence of it. She shows a lot of evidence of knee-jerk
reaction to anything in conventional medicine -- she labels it "bad."
This is not a sign of "considering the evidence." Quite the contrary.

Quoted message said:

She is perfectly entitled to her opinion that it's not in the best
interests of young children to have the blood and pus of sick horses,
along with some mercury and various other chemicals, pumped into
their bloodstreams.

Except that's not what's in most vaccines, especially the mercury.
So such an objection is meaningless.

Quoted message said:

I have a great deal of admiration for Jan, who is subjected to the
most terrible abuse in this newsgroup day after day for standing up
for her convictions in the face of the almost overwhelming power of
the medical establishment.

Many of the people who are critical of Jan are not part of the
"medical establishment." And sticking by one's guns in a wrong-
headed attitude is not a virtue. Sincerity is highly overrated.

Quoted message said:

I'm sure that her dedication has helped many people to find simple,
natural remedies for their complaints, rather than the drugs that are
pushed by the licenced drug-pushers.

I doubt that she has done anything of the sort, since most of her
tirades are not directed towards helping others find salvation through
"natural" cures (a questionable term). Most of them are about the
evils of mercury and the awfulness of conventional medicine.

Quoted message said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

Who says she's standing for the truth? Just because you think God is
on your side doesn't mean anything. If both teams playing in a
football game pray before the game, only one of them is still going to
win. Does God hate the losing team?

Quoted message said:

Consider him who endured such opposition from sinful men, so that you
will not grow weary and lose heart." (Heb 12:2-3)

Irrelevant. She's not trying to save our souls, she's trying to abuse
us (and succeeding).

Mercy me.

Who is doing the abusing???

Another lie. David, and NOT an unknowing one.

http://tinyurl.com/t7my

That comes from Ted Nidiffer.

Who has handed out abuse using my ill and even dead parents to belittle??

For the most abusive poster see Andrew Kingoff rantings and lies.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 10/31/2003 2:42 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(rodney_victor) said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

I have a couple of verses to encourage you:

And here's another:

But I learned to accept it
Accept it with pride
For you don't count the dead
When God's on your side

Umm. Please acknowledge the source of your quotes, Peter.

Thos one is truly sick.

God doesn't take sides.

Death is very painful for anyone who is capable of feeling.

Jan

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: [email hidden] (Jan)
Date: 10/31/2003 5:49 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
Date: 10/31/2003 11:45 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

In article <[email hidden]>,

rodney_victor said:

If Jan posts the URL of an anti-vaccination site, it means that she
hates vaccinations. That's all that you can logically conclude if she
posts the URL to an anti-vaccination site. You cannot use that fact to
conclude that she hates children. In fact, all the evidence points to
the fact that she loves children. And no doubt it is because of her
love for children that she wants to save them from the dangers of
vaccinations.

Why doesn't she want to save them from the dangers of vaccine-
preventable diseases? The odds of harm from the disease (with
the possible exception of chicken pox) are much higher than the
odds of harm from the vaccine.

Quoted message said:

Some evidently think (or are being paid to say) that vaccinations are
good for children, but Jan has considered the evidence and she has
come to the opposite conclusion.

It's highly questionable that she has done anything of the sort. She
shows no evidence of it. She shows a lot of evidence of knee-jerk
reaction to anything in conventional medicine -- she labels it "bad."
This is not a sign of "considering the evidence." Quite the contrary.

Quoted message said:

She is perfectly entitled to her opinion that it's not in the best
interests of young children to have the blood and pus of sick horses,
along with some mercury and various other chemicals, pumped into
their bloodstreams.

Except that's not what's in most vaccines, especially the mercury.
So such an objection is meaningless.

Quoted message said:

I have a great deal of admiration for Jan, who is subjected to the
most terrible abuse in this newsgroup day after day for standing up
for her convictions in the face of the almost overwhelming power of
the medical establishment.

Many of the people who are critical of Jan are not part of the
"medical establishment." And sticking by one's guns in a wrong-
headed attitude is not a virtue. Sincerity is highly overrated.

Quoted message said:

I'm sure that her dedication has helped many people to find simple,
natural remedies for their complaints, rather than the drugs that are
pushed by the licenced drug-pushers.

I doubt that she has done anything of the sort, since most of her
tirades are not directed towards helping others find salvation through
"natural" cures (a questionable term). Most of them are about the
evils of mercury and the awfulness of conventional medicine.

Quoted message said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

Who says she's standing for the truth? Just because you think God is
on your side doesn't mean anything. If both teams playing in a
football game pray before the game, only one of them is still going to
win. Does God hate the losing team?

Quoted message said:

Consider him who endured such opposition from sinful men, so that you
will not grow weary and lose heart." (Heb 12:2-3)

Irrelevant. She's not trying to save our souls, she's trying to abuse
us (and succeeding).

Mercy me.

Who is doing the abusing???

Another lie. David, and NOT an unknowing one.

http://tinyurl.com/t7my

Correction:

http://jan.drew.wasarrested.com/S-Florida/Tampa+Bay/prostitute/F

This is Ted's style.

Peter Bowditch said:

(rodney_victor) said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

I have a couple of verses to encourage you:

And here's another:

But I learned to accept it
Accept it with pride
For you don't count the dead
When God's on your side

In a many dark hour
I've been thinkin' about this
That Jesus Christ
Was betrayed by a kiss
But I can't think for you
You'll have to decide
Whether Judas Iscariot
Had God on his side.

So now as I'm leavin'
I'm weary as Hell
The confusion I'm feelin'
Ain't no tongue can tell
The words fill my head
And fall to the floor
If God's on our side
He'll stop the next war.

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 10/31/2003 2:42 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(rodney_victor) said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.

I have a couple of verses to encourage you:

And here's another:

But I learned to accept it
Accept it with pride
For you don't count the dead
When God's on your side

Umm. Please acknowledge the source of your quotes, Peter.

Sorry, I made a mistake by not giving the source. See how easy it is
to apologise.

Bob Dylan - With God on Our Side, 1964. Full words at
http://bobdylan.com/songs/withgod.html

Quoted message said:

Thos one is truly sick.

It's an anti-war song, much like "Late Home Tonight" by Roger Waters,
another song you denigrated without comprehension. I did not expect
you to recognise it or appreciate its meaning.

Quoted message said:

God doesn't take sides.

Maybe He should. More from Bob:

So now as I'm leavin'
I'm weary as Hell
The confusion I'm feelin'
Ain't no tongue can tell
The words fill my head
And fall to the floor
If God's on our side
He'll stop the next war

Quoted message said:

Death is very painful for anyone who is capable of feeling.

Jan

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 10/31/2003 6:48 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 10/31/2003 2:42 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (rodney_victor) wrote:

>Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
>and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
>effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the effort.
>
>I have a couple of verses to encourage you:

And here's another:

But I learned to accept it
Accept it with pride
For you don't count the dead
When God's on your side

Umm. Please acknowledge the source of your quotes, Peter.

Sorry, I made a mistake by not giving the source. See how easy it is
to apologise.

Uh huh, I already know as I have done it plenty of times.

How easy is it to apologise for your lies in your Three dead children website
and comments here??

Do show us.

Quoted message said:

Bob Dylan - With God on Our Side, 1964. Full words at
http://bobdylan.com/songs/withgod.html

Quoted message said:

Thos one is truly sick.

Quoted message said:

It's an anti-war song, much like "Late Home Tonight" by Roger Waters,
another song you denigrated without comprehension

It's pretty hard to denigrate a song I've never heard.

Quoted message said:

I did not expect you to recognise it or appreciate its meaning.

I see nothing to appreciate.

As I said, God doesn't take sides and death is painful to anyone who is capable
of feelings.

I thought you just expressed the pain of those you know who committed suicide.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

God doesn't take sides.

Maybe He should. More from Bob:

I disagree. That would be unfair, and that isn't like the God I know.

Quoted message said:

So now as I'm leavin'
I'm weary as Hell
The confusion I'm feelin'
Ain't no tongue can tell
The words fill my head
And fall to the floor
If God's on our side
He'll stop the next war

I disagree with that also. God gave man a choice, some people incorrectly blame
God, for all bad things happening in this world. These things come from making
wrong choices.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Death is very painful for anyone who is capable of feeling.

Jan

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 10/31/2003 2:42 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(rodney_victor) said:

Jan, I gather you are a believer in the God who created the heavens
and the earth, and I am sure that He sustains you sometimes when the
effort of standing for the truth seems to be hardly worth the
effort.

I have a couple of verses to encourage you:

And here's another:

But I learned to accept it
Accept it with pride
For you don't count the dead
When God's on your side

Umm. Please acknowledge the source of your quotes, Peter.

Robert Zimmerman..........you probably wouldn't relate to
him........he's Jewish.

Quoted message said:

Thos one is truly sick.

Quoted message said:

God doesn't take sides.

Thicko.......the song relates to the "humans" who think he does, and
those who will use religion to further *their* ends.

Quoted message said:

Death is very painful for anyone who is capable of feeling.

Enlightening!

(Jan) said:

Death is very painful for anyone who is capable of feeling.

Jan

Then you should have a very easy time with it when your number is up.

WB
--
Take out the G'RBAGE to reply
[email hidden]

Just going to snip out a couple of points on this diatribe
as it wanders all over the place.

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

It's an anti-war song, much like "Late Home Tonight" by Roger Waters,
another song you denigrated without comprehension

It's pretty hard to denigrate a song I've never heard.

Quoted message said:

I did not expect you to recognise it or appreciate its meaning.

I see nothing to appreciate.

Question: What qualifies anyone to comment on anything
that you have never heard?

Quoted message said:

As I said, God doesn't take sides

You are wrong here, God takes sides, against evil.

Quoted message said:

and death is painful to anyone who is capable
of feelings.

Since you don't have *Personal Experience* yet;
you are unqualified to comment about your own death.

-WB

--
Take out the G'RBAGE to reply
[email hidden]

WB said:

(Jan) said:

Death is very painful for anyone who is capable of feeling.

Jan

Then you should have a very easy time with it when your number is up.

Splork!!!!! <wipes coffee off monitor> :-)

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: WB [email hidden]
Date: 10/31/2003 8:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Just going to snip out a couple of points on this diatribe
as it wanders all over the place.

Quoted message said:

Question: What qualifies anyone to comment on anything
that you have never heard?

That doesn't make sense.

Quoted message said:

As I said, God doesn't take sides

You are wrong here, God takes sides, against evil.

Duh. God doesn't take sides with people, he loves them all equally.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

and death is painful to anyone who is capable
of feelings.

Since you don't have *Personal Experience* yet;
you are unqualified to comment about your own death.

-WB

Are you drinking again tonight?

I said nothing about my own death.

Get real and get lost. Troll.

Jan

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: WB [email hidden]
Date: 10/31/2003 8:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Just going to snip out a couple of points on this diatribe
as it wanders all over the place.

Quoted message said:

Question: What qualifies anyone to comment on anything
that you have never heard?

That doesn't make sense.

Quoted message said:

As I said, God doesn't take sides

You are wrong here, God takes sides, against evil.

Duh. God doesn't take sides with people, he loves them all equally.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

and death is painful to anyone who is capable
of feelings.

Since you don't have *Personal Experience* yet;
you are unqualified to comment about your own death.

-WB

Are you drinking again tonight?

I said nothing about my own death.

Get real and get lost. Troll.

*Vereeeeeey* Christian.

"Damnant quod non intelligunt"

Jan said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Rampant Hate and Lies
From: WB [email hidden]
Date: 10/31/2003 8:45 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Just going to snip out a couple of points on this diatribe
as it wanders all over the place.

Quoted message said:

Question: What qualifies anyone to comment on anything
that you have never heard?

That doesn't make sense.

Quoted message said:

As I said, God doesn't take sides

You are wrong here, God takes sides, against evil.

Duh. God doesn't take sides with people, he loves them all equally.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

and death is painful to anyone who is capable
of feelings.

Since you don't have *Personal Experience* yet;
you are unqualified to comment about your own death.

-WB

Are you drinking again tonight?

I said nothing about my own death.

Get real and get lost. Troll.

Jan