General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Preschool Meds

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 6 posts · 323 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 May 2004
Last activity
24 May 2004
Original author
Jan
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
323
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.researchprotection.org/infomail/1202/15.html

    NY Times Preschool Meds

    December 15, 2002

    How, one wonders, do the editors of The New York Times Magazine define what's
    "fit to print"? Does bias toward promoting increased drug use while avoiding
    disclosure of conflicts of interest enter the editors' decision-making process?

    Below is a letter to the editor as submitted, followed by what was
    "selectively" published.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Nov 25, 2002
    The New York Times Magazine
    Letters to the Editor

    To the Editor:

    Sheryl Gay Stolberg's article [Nov 17] about a controversial, government
    sponsored psychiatric drug experiment conducted on healthy, but rambunctious
    preschool children--some as young as 3 years old--failed to mention the tough
    ethical issues raised:

    First, young children are being exposed to risks of harm by ingesting Ritalin,
    a psychostimulant drug, at increasingly higher doses, to test their tolerance
    of the drug. They are started at 1.25 mg a day and increased to as much as 7.5
    mg three times a day.

    Whereas the most common adverse drug side effects such as involuntary tics,
    weight loss, and insomnia, were mentioned, the article fails to mention the
    most serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency, and no
    one even claims to know whether the drug will permanently alter or interfere
    with young children’s brain development.

    Indeed, in scientific articles, Dr. Steven Hyman, former director of National
    Institute of Mental Health, refers to psychostimulant drugs--such as Ritalin,
    amphetamine, and cocaine--as "addictive drugs of abuse." The drugs, he
    explains, cause "perturbations in neurotransmitter function" leading to
    "substantial and long-lasting alterations in neural function." [Hyman S,
    "Initiation and adaptation: a paradigm for understanding psychoactive drug
    action." The American Journal of Psychiatry, 1996 vol. 153:151-162]

    Other key facts not disclosed to readers is that the researchers conducting the
    study have received grants and honoraria from the drug companies that stand to
    gain from the experiment.

    Vera Hassner Sharav
    Founder and President The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
    New York City
    212-595-8974

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/magazine/15LETTERS.html

    The most common adverse side-effects to Ritalin (involuntary tics, appetite
    loss and insomnia) were mentioned, but the article fails to note the most
    serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency. No one claims
    to know whether the drug will permanently alter or interfere with young
    children's brain development.

    Vera Hassner Sharav
    New York

  2. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Preschool Meds
    From: [email hidden] (Jan)
    Date: 5/22/2004 7:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Sheryl Gay Stolberg's article [Nov 17] about a controversial, government
    sponsored psychiatric drug experiment conducted on healthy, but rambunctious
    preschool children--some as young as 3 years old--failed to mention the tough
    ethical issues raised:

    who's parents gave written informed consent

    thus it is NONE of Janny poo's concern

    hawki.....

  3. Quoted message said:


    http://www.researchprotection.org/infomail/1202/15.html

    NY Times Preschool Meds

    December 15, 2002

    How, one wonders, do the editors of The New York Times Magazine define what's
    "fit to print"? Does bias toward promoting increased drug use while avoiding
    disclosure of conflicts of interest enter the editors' decision-making
    process?

    Below is a letter to the editor as submitted, followed by what was
    "selectively" published.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Nov 25, 2002
    The New York Times Magazine
    Letters to the Editor

    To the Editor:

    Sheryl Gay Stolberg's article [Nov 17] about a controversial, government
    sponsored psychiatric drug experiment conducted on healthy, but rambunctious
    preschool children--some as young as 3 years old--failed to mention the tough
    ethical issues raised:

    First, young children are being exposed to risks of harm by ingesting
    Ritalin,
    a psychostimulant drug, at increasingly higher doses, to test their tolerance
    of the drug. They are started at 1.25 mg a day and increased to as much as
    7.5
    mg three times a day.

    Whereas the most common adverse drug side effects such as involuntary tics,
    weight loss, and insomnia, were mentioned, the article fails to mention the
    most serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency, and no
    one even claims to know whether the drug will permanently alter or interfere
    with young children’s brain development.

    Indeed, in scientific articles, Dr. Steven Hyman, former director of National
    Institute of Mental Health, refers to psychostimulant drugs--such as Ritalin,
    amphetamine, and cocaine--as "addictive drugs of abuse." The drugs, he
    explains, cause "perturbations in neurotransmitter function" leading to
    "substantial and long-lasting alterations in neural function." [Hyman S,
    "Initiation and adaptation: a paradigm for understanding psychoactive drug
    action." The American Journal of Psychiatry, 1996 vol. 153:151-162]

    Other key facts not disclosed to readers is that the researchers conducting
    the
    study have received grants and honoraria from the drug companies that stand
    to
    gain from the experiment.

    Vera Hassner Sharav
    Founder and President The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
    New York City
    212-595-8974

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/magazine/15LETTERS.html

    The most common adverse side-effects to Ritalin (involuntary tics, appetite
    loss and insomnia) were mentioned, but the article fails to note the most
    serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency. No one
    claims
    to know whether the drug will permanently alter or interfere with young
    children's brain development.

    Vera Hassner Sharav
    New York

  4. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/magazine/15LETTERS.html

    The most common adverse side-effects to Ritalin (involuntary tics,


    appetite

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    loss and insomnia) were mentioned, but the article fails to note the most
    serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency.

    Even Jan does not beleive this, as she has posted an article which said just
    the opposite.

  5. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Preschool Meds
    From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 22, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
    [email hidden]
    Date: 5/23/2004 6:18 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Mark selectively snipping wrote?>

    Quoted message said:

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/magazine/15LETTERS.html

    The most common adverse side-effects to Ritalin (involuntary tics,


    appetite

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    loss and insomnia) were mentioned, but the article fails to note the most
    serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency.

    Even Jan does not beleive this

    It isn't Mark's job to say what Jan believes, and is a diversion.

    Back to the subject.

    http://www.researchprotection.org/infomail/1202/15.html

    NY Times Preschool Meds

    December 15, 2002

    How, one wonders, do the editors of The New York Times Magazine define what's
    "fit to print"? Does bias toward promoting increased drug use while avoiding
    disclosure of conflicts of interest enter the editors' decision-making process?

    Below is a letter to the editor as submitted, followed by what was
    "selectively" published.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Nov 25, 2002
    The New York Times Magazine
    Letters to the Editor

    To the Editor:

    Sheryl Gay Stolberg's article [Nov 17] about a controversial, government
    sponsored psychiatric drug experiment conducted on healthy, but rambunctious
    preschool children--some as young as 3 years old--failed to mention the tough
    ethical issues raised:

    First, young children are being exposed to risks of harm by ingesting Ritalin,
    a psychostimulant drug, at increasingly higher doses, to test their tolerance
    of the drug. They are started at 1.25 mg a day and increased to as much as 7.5
    mg three times a day.

    Whereas the most common adverse drug side effects such as involuntary tics,
    weight loss, and insomnia, were mentioned, the article fails to mention the
    most serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency, and no
    one even claims to know whether the drug will permanently alter or interfere
    with young children’s brain development.

    Indeed, in scientific articles, Dr. Steven Hyman, former director of National
    Institute of Mental Health, refers to psychostimulant drugs--such as Ritalin,
    amphetamine, and cocaine--as "addictive drugs of abuse." The drugs, he
    explains, cause "perturbations in neurotransmitter function" leading to
    "substantial and long-lasting alterations in neural function." [Hyman S,
    "Initiation and adaptation: a paradigm for understanding psychoactive drug
    action." The American Journal of Psychiatry, 1996 vol. 153:151-162]

    Other key facts not disclosed to readers is that the researchers conducting the
    study have received grants and honoraria from the drug companies that stand to
    gain from the experiment.

    Vera Hassner Sharav
    Founder and President The Alliance for Human Research Protection (AHRP)
    New York City
    212-595-8974

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/magazine/15LETTERS.html

    The most common adverse side-effects to Ritalin (involuntary tics, appetite
    loss and insomnia) were mentioned, but the article fails to note the most
    serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency. No one claims
    to know whether the drug will permanently alter or interfere with young
    children's brain development.

    Vera Hassner Sharav
    New York

  6. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Preschool Meds
    From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 22, 2004" M.a.r.kP.r.o.b.e.r.t
    [email hidden]
    Date: 5/23/2004 6:18 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Mark selectively snipping wrote?>

    Quoted message said:

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    >http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/15/magazine/15LETTERS.html
    >
    >The most common adverse side-effects to Ritalin (involuntary tics,


    appetite

    Quoted message said:

    >loss and insomnia) were mentioned, but the article fails to note the


    most

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >serious: Ritalin is often a gateway drug to abuse and dependency.

    Even Jan does not beleive this

    It isn't Mark's job to say what Jan believes, and is a diversion.

    Nope, merely pointing out that YOU provided proof to the contrary. Now you
    flip-flop.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.