Re: Peter Bowditch:

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 4:57 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

>Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch
>From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
>Date: 12/16/2003 3:20 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Once again you answered this kook, why I'll never know.

Perhaps he is related to Happy Oyster.

Ignore him.

Your telling lies in your reply just reduces yourself to his level.

Jan

I replied to him because if I didn't people who read his drivel and
don't know the background might believe what he says. Would you
respond if someone said that your daughter was having sex with the
family pets or would you just grin and bear it?

Everyone knows who the kook is. Just as with Happy saying I am a criminal.

"Everyone" does not know who he is. He used a new false name this
time.

Quoted message said:

You are just feeding him.

Quoted message said:

I don't know why you started a new thread for this, but it makes it
hard for people to know what is going on. Perhaps that is your
objective.

Why do you always look for the bad??

Why can't you follow the accepted practices of Usenet when it comes to
quoting and replying?

Quoted message said:

I erased the kook part, both in the title and in his post. I would have thought
you would have appreciated that.

There was no "kook" in the title. There was a lie.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.

Oh knock it off.

No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

For those who wonder what Jan is talking about, here is the complete
message to which she was replying:

OH well, repeat it all again!!!!

Why not? people who did not see the original thread have the right to
know what you are talking about. They also might like to check for
themselves to see where the "lying" is.

Quoted message said:

Duh.

You don't even know when someone is trying to help you.

You would help me by quoting correctly and by replying directly to Mr
O'Neill, rather than starting new threads which criticise my actions.

Quoted message said:

That is sad.

It certainly is.

Quoted message said:

Jan

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 5:53 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 4:57 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

>>Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch
>>From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
>>Date: 12/16/2003 3:20 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>
>Once again you answered this kook, why I'll never know.
>
>Perhaps he is related to Happy Oyster.
>
>Ignore him.
>
>Your telling lies in your reply just reduces yourself to his level.
>
>Jan

I replied to him because if I didn't people who read his drivel and
don't know the background might believe what he says. Would you
respond if someone said that your daughter was having sex with the
family pets or would you just grin and bear it?

Everyone knows who the kook is. Just as with Happy saying I am a criminal.

"Everyone" does not know who he is. He used a new false name this
time.

He always uses a false name, everyone can tell from his kooky posts who he is.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You are just feeding him.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I don't know why you started a new thread for this, but it makes it

Quoted message said:

hard for people to know what is going on. Perhaps that is your
objective.

Why do you always look for the bad??

Quoted message said:

Why can't you follow the accepted practices of Usenet when it comes to
quoting and replying?

Some things aren't worthy of being repeated.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I erased the kook part, both in the title and in his post. I would have

thought

Quoted message said:

you would have appreciated that.

Quoted message said:

There was no "kook" in the title. There was a lie.

I said the kook *part*.

Quoted message said:

And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.

Quoted message said:

Oh knock it off.

No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.

Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

For those who wonder what Jan is talking about, here is the complete
message to which she was replying:

OH well, repeat it all again!!!!

Quoted message said:

Why not?

Duh.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You don't even know when someone is trying to help you.

Quoted message said:

You would help me by quoting correctly and by replying directly to Mr
O'Neill, rather than starting new threads which criticise my actions.

I preferred to help you by NOT repeating the kook part.

Sorry that didn't suit you.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

That is sad.

It certainly is.

Yes. You should appreciate when one is helping you, but I guess not.

Jan

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.

Quoted message said:

Oh knock it off.

No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.

Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.

I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?

I really don't know. I want you to tell me.

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote..................

Quoted message said:

Stop playing dumb................

Some have that option when the spirit moves them, others do not - then they
play *smart*.

Sad that.

Indeed.

carabelli

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 8:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.
>
>Oh knock it off.

No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.

Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.

I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?

I really don't know. I want you to tell me.

OK!!

*I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer
Research Group back to the world outside institutional walls. He has
been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his
last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 8:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

>And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.
>>
>>Oh knock it off.
>
>No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.

Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.

I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?

I really don't know. I want you to tell me.

OK!!

*I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer
Research Group back to the world outside institutional walls. He has
been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his
last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

Is this the same person ?

William J. O'Neil

From the writers of the popular Investor's Business Daily Leaders & Success series, comes Business
Leaders & Success with an introduction by Wall Street legend and IBD Founder & Chairman
William J. O'Neil.

http://www.investors.com/lands/

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 8:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

>And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.
>>
>>Oh knock it off.
>
>No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.

Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.

I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?

I really don't know. I want you to tell me.

OK!!

*I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer
Research Group back to the world outside institutional walls. He has
been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his
last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

So, now tell me which part is the LIE.

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

WB said:

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 8:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

>>And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.
>>>
>>>Oh knock it off.
>>
>>No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.
>
>Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.

I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?

I really don't know. I want you to tell me.

OK!!

*I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer
Research Group back to the world outside institutional walls. He has
been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his
last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

Is this the same person ?

William J. O'Neil

From the writers of the popular Investor's Business Daily Leaders & Success series, comes Business
Leaders & Success with an introduction by Wall Street legend and IBD Founder & Chairman
William J. O'Neil.

http://www.investors.com/lands/

I very much doubt that it is the same person. The nutcase is a cancer
quack from Canada.

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Peter Bowditch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 8:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

>>And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.
>>>
>>>Oh knock it off.
>>
>>No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.
>
>Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.

I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?

I really don't know. I want you to tell me.

OK!!

*I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer
Research Group back to the world outside institutional walls. He has
been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his
last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

So, now tell me which part is the LIE.

Jan does not understand the concept of sarcasm.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 11:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 8:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

>>And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.
>>>
>>>Oh knock it off.
>>
>>No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.
>
>Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.

I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?

I really don't know. I want you to tell me.

OK!!

*I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer
Research Group back to the world outside institutional walls. He has
been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his
last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

So, now tell me which part is the LIE.

Quoted message said:

I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill

Quoted message said:

He has been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his

Quoted message said:

last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 11:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

(Jan) said:

>Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
>From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
>Date: 12/16/2003 8:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>
>[email hidden] (Jan) wrote:
>
>>>And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.
>>>>
>>>>Oh knock it off.
>>>
>>>No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.
>>
>>Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.
>
>I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?
>
>I really don't know. I want you to tell me.

OK!!

*I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer
Research Group back to the world outside institutional walls. He has
been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his
last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

So, now tell me which part is the LIE.

Quoted message said:

I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill

Quoted message said:

He has been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his

Quoted message said:

last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the bed.*

Jan

He was away for 174 days. He was away for 90 days the last time.

I agree that 174 is not exactly twice 90.

Now, where is the lie?

--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Peter Bowditch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

(Jan) said:

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/16/2003 11:17 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

[email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

>>Subject: Re: Peter Bowditch:
>>From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
>>Date: 12/16/2003 8:05 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: <[email hidden]>
>>
>>[email hidden] (Jan) wrote:
>>
>>>>And where did I lie in my reply? Precise details please.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh knock it off.
>>>>
>>>>No, I really want to know. Tell me. Enlighten me.
>>>
>>>Stop playing dumb, you know which part was a lie.
>>
>>I'm sorry for shouting, but WHAT WAS THE LIE IN MY REPLY TO O'NEILL?
>>
>>I really don't know. I want you to tell me.
>
>OK!!
>
>*I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer
>Research Group back to the world outside institutional walls. He has
>been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as his
>last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the

bed.*

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>
>Jan

So, now tell me which part is the LIE.

Quoted message said:

I would like to welcome Mr William P O'Neill

Quoted message said:

He has been away for just under six months this time, twice as long as

his

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>last sojourn in the place with the soft walls and the straps on the

bed.*

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Jan

He was away for 174 days. He was away for 90 days the last time.

I agree that 174 is not exactly twice 90.

Now, where is the lie?

Peter, are you forgetting that for Jan the equation reads:

Jan not understanding = lie

x-no-archive: yes

Marciosos6 Probertiosos6 said:

Jan not understanding = lie

No, you got the formula all wrong.

Mark Probert opening his pie-hole = lie.

Hope that helped.

Atlas