Jason Earl said:Dally <[email hidden]> writes:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I told him that he absolutely may not hurt a kid at school.
Everyone needed to be safe at school. No matter how provoked, he
couldn't kick the kid at school.So he should lure him into the woods and beat him up there.
Quoted message said:"Butching up" is definitely good, but that doesn't mean that you teach
your boys that ambushing kids outside of school is a good idea. It is
one thing to be prepared to defend yourself in case of emergency, it
is another thing entirely to be prepared to use violence as a tool.
There's a word for a child that is willing to ambush other children to
settle a dispute. The word is "bully."
We were engaging in a bit of fantasy there. Six year olds aren't known
for tramping about alone in woods. Well, MINE does, but the little
porker my kid is tussling with wouldn't be able to walk that far.
Quoted message said:Besides, fighting is inherently dangerous, and even the scuffles that
boys get into as youngsters can have tragic consequences. As your boy
gets older any altercations become inherently more dangerous. In
essence your boy should only fight when what he is fighting for is
also worth dying for. Being "grouchy" doesn't qualify 🙂.
That's a good point.
Quoted message said:Diplomacy is the key word. If this kid really is a bully there are
plenty of ways of dealing with him intelligently.
I don't know if the kid qualifies as a bully yet. All six year olds are
a bit inclined to try to get their own way without regard to what others
need. Empathy isn't a first-grade strong suit.
Walking home today, being nervous about the note from his teacher in his
backpack, my kid was bouncing off the snow banks. He's got a LOT more
energy than is easily constrained in a classroom. I think some of this
is just the hard job of breaking a wild child to the saddle.
Perhaps I can convince the teacher to let me hang a heavy bag in the
classroom and supply it with a set of boxing gloves.
Dally