Re: olive oil

John Sankey a écrit dans le message ...

Quoted message said:

"I'd say one can't typically be considered "researcher" before
getting at least few hundreds of citations."

Depends on what field you are in. In experimental physics (my
main field) 10 good citations can get you tenure. Even though I
and my team managed half a dozen world firsts in a hot field, I
doubt I reached a hundred before I retired. In biological
sciences even the best workers can take decades to reach a
hundred.

I think I will have to trade my knee boots for hipboots

JL

John Sankey said:

"I'd say one can't typically be considered "researcher" before
getting at least few hundreds of citations."

Depends on what field you are in. In experimental physics (my main
field) 10 good citations can get you tenure. Even though I and my
team managed half a dozen world firsts in a hot field, I doubt I
reached a hundred before I retired.

Maybe you should've checked :-)
What branch of physics specifically are you talking about?

Quoted message said:

In biological sciences even the best workers can take decades to
reach a hundred.

This is not true. I can speak with confidence about
1) Biological sciences (specifically biomedical and genetics).
2) Statistics.

Although these fields are seemingly very different good researchers in
these fields have thousands of citations. Even best single papers
accumulate thousands of citations. I accumulated over 100 in
statistical genetics even before I graduated. My citation rate right
now is 12 citations a month.

John Sankey said:

"I'd say one can't typically be considered "researcher" before
getting at least few hundreds of citations."

Depends on what field you are in. In experimental physics (my main
field) 10 good citations can get you tenure. Even though I and my
team managed half a dozen world firsts in a hot field, I doubt I
reached a hundred before I retired.

Maybe you should've checked :-)
What branch of physics specifically are you talking about?

Quoted message said:

In biological sciences even the best workers can take decades to
reach a hundred.

This is not true. I can speak with confidence about
1) Biological sciences (specifically biomedical and genetics).
2) Statistics.

Although these fields are seemingly very different good researchers in
these fields have thousands of citations. Even best single papers
accumulate thousands of citations. I accumulated over 100 in
statistical genetics even before I graduated. My citation rate right
now is 12 citations a month.

John Sankey said:

DZ said:

I'd say one can't typically be considered "researcher" before
getting at least few hundreds of citations."

Depends on what field you are in. In experimental physics (my
main field) 10 good citations can get you tenure. Even though I
and my team managed half a dozen world firsts in a hot field, I
doubt I reached a hundred before I retired. In biological
sciences even the best workers can take decades to reach a
hundred.

So, regarding physics. This paper by a physicist JE Hirsch
(arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0508025) was just publicized in Science
Magazine (Aug 12 2005).

In author's opinion a person deserves tenure if s/he has 12 papers
each cited at least 12 times. For a full professor one has to have 18
papers, each cited at least 18 times.

The index he proposed to characterize a researcher is "h": h papers
cited at least h times. The index weeds out people writing bad papers
nobody cites, as well as those who has just few articles with very
many citations.

DZ

DZ said:

In author's opinion a person deserves tenure if s/he has 12 papers
each cited at least 12 times. For a full professor one has to have 18
papers, each cited at least 18 times.

While searching for the web for links to my web site, I came across one
professor who was claiming my reference to his research paper on my web
site as a citation of his research paper.

It is a small brave world after all.

Ha, ... Hah, Ha! I am being totally serious.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

In author's opinion a person deserves tenure if s/he has 12 papers
each cited at least 12 times. For a full professor one has to have 18
papers, each cited at least 18 times.

While searching for the web for links to my web site, I came across one
professor who was claiming my reference to his research paper on my web
site as a citation of his research paper.

It is a small brave world after all.

I recently came across a 3rd citation of my web site in an academic
research paper.

THE RECENT STAGES OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC TRANSITION IN CANADA: WHICH
HYPOTHESES ARE ACCURATE AND WHICH ARE NOT?
35 pages long in PDF file format, published July - August 2005
International Union for the Scientific Study of Population
Princeton University
http://iussp2005.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=51023

For the other 2 citations, see:
The mission of our site has been a success
http://naturalhealthperspective.com/contact/aboutus.html

Man they must be hard up or lazy or both!!!

RBR

Mr-Natural-Health said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

In author's opinion a person deserves tenure if s/he has 12 papers
each cited at least 12 times. For a full professor one has to have 18
papers, each cited at least 18 times.

While searching for the web for links to my web site, I came across one
professor who was claiming my reference to his research paper on my web
site as a citation of his research paper.

It is a small brave world after all.

I recently came across a 3rd citation of my web site in an academic
research paper.

THE RECENT STAGES OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC TRANSITION IN CANADA: WHICH
HYPOTHESES ARE ACCURATE AND WHICH ARE NOT?
35 pages long in PDF file format, published July - August 2005
International Union for the Scientific Study of Population
Princeton University
http://iussp2005.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=51023

For the other 2 citations, see:
The mission of our site has been a success
http://naturalhealthperspective.com/contact/aboutus.html