General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: multi-drug resistant TB persists

Started by Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com · · Last activity · 9 posts · 427 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
2 June 2005
Last activity
13 June 2005
Original author
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
427
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Your point?

    Once upon a time, TB was a disease much like AIDS. Usually fatal, with
    no treatment.

    Today, it can usually be cured in the individual, although (as the
    article notes) with a multidrug resistant strain it can cost tens of
    thousands to do it--- or even hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep
    somebody locked up in quaranteen for a year or two while you give them
    pills they wouldn't otherwise take. I've seen that happen. Quananteen
    is one of the few places where force is necessary in medicine, for
    otherwise people go out and infect others with a disease which is
    increasingly hard to treat (which is how we got to where we are with
    TB). You can't let people [censored] in the water supply either, however much
    they'd like to.

    By the way, multi-drug resistant TB is no more virulent than ordinary
    TB of 60 years ago. Just harder to cure with antibiotics. That is as
    opposed to the disease of 60 years ago which had no cure at all.

    SBH

  2. "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Your point?

    Once upon a time, TB was a disease much like AIDS. Usually fatal, with
    no treatment.

    Not true there was many natural home remedies without pharm drugs. They were
    dying holistically treated.
    That's what she wants to go back to.

    Quoted message said:


    Today, it can usually be cured in the individual, although (as the
    article notes) with a multidrug resistant strain it can cost tens of
    thousands to do it--- or even hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep
    somebody locked up in quaranteen for a year or two while you give them
    pills they wouldn't otherwise take. I've seen that happen. Quananteen
    is one of the few places where force is necessary in medicine, for
    otherwise people go out and infect others with a disease which is
    increasingly hard to treat (which is how we got to where we are with
    TB). You can't let people [censored] in the water supply either, however much
    they'd like to.

    By the way, multi-drug resistant TB is no more virulent than ordinary
    TB of 60 years ago. Just harder to cure with antibiotics. That is as
    opposed to the disease of 60 years ago which had no cure at all.

    SBH

  3. Sbharrisatsignix.netcom.com said:

    Your point?

    Once upon a time, TB was a disease much like AIDS. Usually fatal, with
    no treatment.

    Today, it can usually be cured in the individual, although (as the
    article notes) with a multidrug resistant strain it can cost tens of
    thousands to do it--- or even hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep
    somebody locked up in quaranteen for a year or two while you give them
    pills they wouldn't otherwise take. I've seen that happen. Quananteen
    is one of the few places where force is necessary in medicine, for
    otherwise people go out and infect others with a disease which is
    increasingly hard to treat (which is how we got to where we are with
    TB). You can't let people [censored] in the water supply either, however much
    they'd like to.

    By the way, multi-drug resistant TB is no more virulent than ordinary
    TB of 60 years ago. Just harder to cure with antibiotics.

    Oh do tell Steve!

    That is as

    Quoted message said:

    opposed to the disease of 60 years ago which had no cure at all.

    So it had the same cure then as it does now. None. Right on that count.
    But the point of at least one of the articles I posted (the JAMA
    editorial?) is that the 'cure' for TB isn't a drug so much as it's
    prevention. On the social order.

    Zee

    Quoted message said:


    SBH

  4. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So it had the same cure then as it does now. None.<<

    Since you insist on using the word "cure" to mean eradication from the
    Earth, no. But if you get TB we can now save your life and keep it from
    killing you. That wasn't possible in the last century.

    We don't do as well with cancer as TB, but we do make a big impact.
    Depending on the cancer, individuals can be treated so as to be
    cancer-free at 20 years, from 95% to 5% of the time, depending on the
    type of tumor. For all cases (excluding skin cancer) the figure is
    about 50% at 20 years. You can therefore look at that glass as half
    full or half empty. A century ago, almost nobody survived 20 years
    after a serious cancer.

    SBH

  5. In sci.med.pharmacy Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : Your point?

    : Once upon a time, TB was a disease much like AIDS. Usually fatal, with
    : no treatment.

    re: original posting

    The development and spread of MDR TB is maintained by very complex social
    and economic factors. (eg Interested readers can do some GOOGLE research
    into "Public Health" and particularly the _"social determinants of
    illness"_.

    Many factors are similar to the "determinants of HIV infection". (The
    WHO.org website is pretty good for explaining why young girls/women are
    among the exploding HIV rates in the developing/'two-thirds' world.)

    It's not just about finding and taking the *right* drugs.

    That's way (way!) too reductionist.

    Emma
    🙂

  6. In sci.med.pharmacy Robert <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    : news:[email hidden]...
    : > Your point?
    : >
    : > Once upon a time, TB was a disease much like AIDS. Usually fatal, with
    : > no treatment.

    : Not true there was many natural home remedies without pharm drugs. They were

    If they all had homes...
    😉

  7. It's not just about finding and taking the *right* drugs.
    That's way (way!) too reductionist.
    Emma

    COMMENT:

    Sure, but you can fairly say that about anything in medicine or
    biology. There are always health problems associated with having too
    little money or education or brains, or from being born in the wrong
    place or to the wrong parents. I'm always surprised at people who
    consider such things "medical" problems, then get mad at doctors who
    want to play God. Can't have it both ways.

    SBH

  8. "outrider" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sbharrisatsignix.netcom.com said:

    Your point?

    Once upon a time, TB was a disease much like AIDS. Usually fatal, with
    no treatment.

    Today, it can usually be cured in the individual, although (as the
    article notes) with a multidrug resistant strain it can cost tens of
    thousands to do it--- or even hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep
    somebody locked up in quaranteen for a year or two while you give them
    pills they wouldn't otherwise take. I've seen that happen. Quananteen
    is one of the few places where force is necessary in medicine, for
    otherwise people go out and infect others with a disease which is
    increasingly hard to treat (which is how we got to where we are with
    TB). You can't let people [censored] in the water supply either, however much
    they'd like to.

    By the way, multi-drug resistant TB is no more virulent than ordinary
    TB of 60 years ago. Just harder to cure with antibiotics.

    Oh do tell Steve!

    That is as

    Quoted message said:

    opposed to the disease of 60 years ago which had no cure at all.

    So it had the same cure then as it does now. None. Right on that count.
    But the point of at least one of the articles I posted (the JAMA
    editorial?) is that the 'cure' for TB isn't a drug so much as it's
    prevention. On the social order.

    Zee a

    Prevention is not a cure. You can not cure someone of TB by preventing it.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    SBH


  9. "Robert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Emma Chase VanCott" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In sci.med.pharmacy Robert <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:

    : news:[email hidden]...
    : > Your point?
    : >
    : > Once upon a time, TB was a disease much like AIDS. Usually fatal,


    with

    Quoted message said:

    : > no treatment.

    : Not true there was many natural home remedies without pharm drugs. They


    were

    Quoted message said:

    If they all had homes...
    😉

    The reason for the increase is patient non-compliance in taking meds. Many
    are homeless and could care less when they start feeling well to stop all
    meds.

    " development of MDR strains due to inadequate case management or poor
    treatment within California,
    or ongoing transmission,"

    One solution is to keep all in house arrest much like typhoid Mary.
    Zee would love that solution but it is the only way to stop it.

    One of the main reasons is the Western world in general and the U.S. in
    particular's insane and suicidal policy of essentially unrestricted immigration:
    We lovingly allow these Typhoid Marys into the country. But heh, how often
    is one given the opportunity to watch a once-great culture commit suicide
    before your very eyes?

    Quoted message said:

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.