Quoted message said:Subject: Re: More Professional Behavior
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 12/13/2003 3:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>
(Jan) said:Quoted message said:Unlike, eg the Hulda Clark mailing list, which ran off someone
yesterday for posting the following message:
Quoted message said:Hi! I'm new to the list. I joined because I read Dr. Clark's book
>"Cure for All Cancers" and couldn't find anyone locally who could
>answer my questions. I found Dr. Clark's ideas fascinating, but I'm
>still a bit skeptical - it seems too simple, especially when compared
>o the information I'm getting from my oncologist. Can anyone on the
list point me to some studies that support Dr. Clark's theories?
They knew you were lying as they have read your lying and belittling
websites.
It wasn't me, Jan. It was someone else
Yes, I see, I read it wrong.
Quoted message said:I was banned a long time ago
because they were so ashamed of what was going on that they didn't
want me watching.
Umm, that's an opinion.
Quoted message said:This person wrote to me to ask whether two hours was
a record for being banned.
Why would they write to you??
Quoted message said:and could not understand why his quite
reasonable question had caused such angst. From the words above, it
looked like this person was actually after some information.
Quoted message said:By the way, the list moderator didn't tell the person he was being
banned or even issue a warning.
Quoted message said:And you keep talking about running people off.
What happens on the Clark list has absolutely nothing to do with me, and yes,
the aim here is to run off all who are not brainwashed, and point out the truth
of organized medicine.
It has worked in the past. As soon as anyone comes on who has used alternative
medicine with success, thy are immediately met by the vultures giving the 5th
degree. The grilling starts soon to be followed by diagnosing and personal
trashing.
Those who refuse to leave become the target of the vultures.
Just as this thread. It is about professional behavior (actually the lack of),
not the Clark list and not Jan.
Did you divert to cover for them??
Again?
BTW, both of these professionals are liars.
Jan
Quoted message said:Subject: Ja|\| DrE\/\/'s Hubris...
From: [email hidden] (Mark)
Date: 12/12/2003 6:59 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>
WB <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:...knows no bounds.
The relentless self-aggrandizement of Drewster only serves
to discredit her positions and sources.
jD is the source of *most* of the wagons of manure that is MHA.
Comments ?
WB
Actually, I don't think I've ever seen her actually contribute much to
the discussion aside from screeching "Liar!!" and waving her arms
about -- when she gets them loose of her straightjacket, that is.
Oh darn, I've been caught!!!
Quoted message said:Mostly, she serves as a beautiful (I've seen her picture, therefore I
use the term figuratively [Baby, beehives went out of style about 40
years ago])
Indeed they did and you didn't see one on me. In fact that is my hair with no
teasing, so as usually you are all wet. Actually my hair and it color and
thickness is one of my assests, so I am not surprise you would stoop so low.
Entertainment value, I'll grant. Information source? Naaah...
Mark, MD
Translation:
We don't want to hear that Ritalin alters the brain.
We don't want to hear the dangers of amalgams.
We don't want to hear of the corruption of organized medicine.
It disturbs our little worlds.
We just can't run Jan off.
So sad, too bad.
Jan