Re: Missing since Jan 18th

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Following up to Chris Street

Quoted message said:

Walker, male, age unknown but little hair, answers to the name of Saunders,
Paul. Inhabits the south Wales area.

I have not had an answer to an email.

Bill? Have you seen owt of our errant young man?
--
If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
situation.

In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Following up to Chris Street

Quoted message said:

Walker, male, age unknown but little hair, answers to the name of Saunders,
Paul. Inhabits the south Wales area.

I have not had an answer to an email.

Bill? Have you seen owt of our errant young man?

Yes.

--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Bill? Have you seen owt of our errant young man?

Yes.

Oh, err, jolly good. Is he well? I assume he's lurking here
and thoroughly enjoying all the attention his absence is
getting. Too much to hope that he's working though...?
<ducks>
--
If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
situation.

In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Bill? Have you seen owt of our errant young man?

Yes.

Oh, err, jolly good. Is he well? I assume he's lurking here
and thoroughly enjoying all the attention his absence is
getting. Too much to hope that he's working though...?
<ducks>

He is better, more than that I can't say (secret) :-)
--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

>Bill? Have you seen owt of our errant young man?

Yes.

Oh, err, jolly good. Is he well? I assume he's lurking here
and thoroughly enjoying all the attention his absence is
getting. Too much to hope that he's working though...?
<ducks>

He is better, more than that I can't say (secret) :-)

I spy an email coming up...
--
If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
situation.

"Chris Street" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

I've got one. He's not dead but I'm saying nowt.....

My theory is that he's bet PW that he can live without urw longer than she
can! :-)

Graham

W. D. Grey said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

He is better, more than that I can't say (secret) :-)

I spy an email coming up...

Words from the horses mouth :-

"Keep 'em guessing" :-)

When is he going to get his much vaunted re-wite of his website done?

--
Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"

In article <[email hidden]>, Phil Cook
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

W. D. Grey said:

Quoted message said:

> He is better, more than that I can't say (secret) :-)
>
I spy an email coming up...

Words from the horses mouth :-

"Keep 'em guessing" :-)

When is he going to get his much vaunted re-wite of his website done?

Good point Phil!

I think he's working on it at the moment.

It had better be worth waiting for :-)
--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes
>[email hidden] said...
>> >Bill? Have you seen owt of our errant young man?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>Oh, err, jolly good. Is he well? I assume he's lurking here
>and thoroughly enjoying all the attention his absence is
>getting. Too much to hope that he's working though...?
><ducks>

He is better, more than that I can't say (secret) :-)

I spy an email coming up...

Words from the horses mouth :-

"Keep 'em guessing" :-)

So that's why I've not heard from you! (I assume you did get
my email? I've had a few SMTP problems lately, so you may not
have done).
--
If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
situation.

In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

So that's why I've not heard from you! (I assume you did get
my email? I've had a few SMTP problems lately, so you may not
have done).

No e-mail arrived here Fran :-(
--
Bill Grey
http://www.billboy.co.uk

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

So that's why I've not heard from you! (I assume you did get
my email? I've had a few SMTP problems lately, so you may not
have done).

No e-mail arrived here Fran :-(

That would explain it. I'll try again.
--
If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
situation.

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Fran
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

So that's why I've not heard from you! (I assume you did get
my email? I've had a few SMTP problems lately, so you may not
have done).

No e-mail arrived here Fran :-(

That would explain it. I'll try again.

Tried again, got response. Paul's a dark horse, that's for
sure. Who'd have thought it?
--
If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
situation.

I noticed that Message-ID:
<[email hidden]> from Fran contained the
following:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

That would explain it. I'll try again.

Tried again, got response. Paul's a dark horse, that's for
sure. Who'd have thought it?

Thought what?

--
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/

In article <[email hidden]>, Geoff Berrow
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

I noticed that Message-ID:
<[email hidden]> from Fran contained the
following:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

That would explain it. I'll try again.

Tried again, got response. Paul's a dark horse, that's for
sure. Who'd have thought it?

Thought what?

it!

--

Dominic Sexton

Dominic Sexton <[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Geoff Berrow
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

I noticed that Message-ID:
<[email hidden]> from Fran contained the
following:

Quoted message said:

> That would explain it. I'll try again.
>
Tried again, got response. Paul's a dark horse, that's for
sure. Who'd have thought it?

Thought what?

it!

Shacked-up with PW......?
--
Gordon Harris

Have I missed something while I've been away?

On 22/2/05 8:01 pm, in article [email hidden], "Gordon

Harris said:

Dominic Sexton <[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Geoff Berrow
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

I noticed that Message-ID:
<[email hidden]> from Fran contained the
following:

>> That would explain it. I'll try again.
>>
> Tried again, got response. Paul's a dark horse, that's for
> sure. Who'd have thought it?

Thought what?

it!

Shacked-up with PW......?

--
Andy Howell
Birmingham, UK

To mail simply put back the dots ...
http://www.ecotrend.org.uk/walking/

Gordon Harris said:

Dominic Sexton <[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Geoff Berrow
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

I noticed that Message-ID:
<[email hidden]> from Fran contained the
following:

>> That would explain it. I'll try again.
>>
>Tried again, got response. Paul's a dark horse, that's for
>sure. Who'd have thought it?

Thought what?

it!

Shacked-up with PW......?

Shackled?
Which one?

Ooops - misread that!

--

R
o
o
n
e
y

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Dominic Sexton <[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Geoff Berrow
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

I noticed that Message-ID:
<[email hidden]> from Fran contained the
following:

>> That would explain it. I'll try again.
>>
>Tried again, got response. Paul's a dark horse, that's for
>sure. Who'd have thought it?

Thought what?

it!

Shacked-up with PW......?

Don't be silly - PW was with Judith et al over the weekend
learning how to become an axe-murderer. I wonder how many
axes they murdered between them?
--
If you can keep your head when all around are losing theirs...
then you've failed to grasp some important aspect of the
situation.

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] says...

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] said...

Quoted message said:

Dominic Sexton <[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>, Geoff Berrow
<[email hidden]> writes
>I noticed that Message-ID:
><[email hidden]> from Fran contained the
>following:
>
>>> That would explain it. I'll try again.
>>>
>>Tried again, got response. Paul's a dark horse, that's for
>>sure. Who'd have thought it?
>
>Thought what?
>
it!

Shacked-up with PW......?

Don't be silly - PW was with Judith et al over the weekend
learning how to become an axe-murderer. I wonder how many
axes they murdered between them?

Well, the people who were supposed to have organised the course came
pretty close to being Trotsky'ed!

And I noticed that PW (or PS as she is now known) had enough clothes for
2 people. Surely coincidence?

All the gory details will be revealed when one of us can get around to
writing a TR and sticking the pictures up on the web.

--
Darren
mail to darren not ng