Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Mafac straddle cables

Started by Mark Janeba · · Last activity · 7 posts · 526 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
16 January 2005
Last activity
17 January 2005
Original author
Mark Janeba
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
526
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. !Jones said:

    Mafac straddle cables:

    In the days of old (like about 1980 or so), were the barrel ends of
    brake cables a different size than they are today?

    The reason I ask is because I'm setting up some Mafac cantilever
    brakes from that era and the barrel ends are not seating. The notch
    in the cantilever arm that receives the cable end is significantly
    smaller than my modern QBP cable end.

    It does not look like a viable option to leave the cable end anything
    less than firmly seated in it's notch. Is there an elegant solution?

    If I understand you correctly, you're talking about the straddle cable
    that connects to both cantilever arms. These are derailleur cables.

    One end is bolted to the arm; for the other you need a
    doohickey[1]threaded on the end of the cable to engage the cantilever
    arms. See photo: http://home.comcast.net/~mandmlj/MafacStraddle.jpg
    (Photo from a 1980 Mafac tandem cantilever brake arm)

    Notice how the "doohickey" keeps the cantilever arms from spreading and
    letting the cable slip through.

    I'm guessing that you're using a more modern straddle that has a *large*
    lug on one end.

    Hope this helps,

    Mark Janeba

  2. Mark Janeba said:
    !Jones said:

    Mafac straddle cables:

    In the days of old (like about 1980 or so), were the barrel ends of
    brake cables a different size than they are today?

    The reason I ask is because I'm setting up some Mafac cantilever
    brakes from that era and the barrel ends are not seating. The notch
    in the cantilever arm that receives the cable end is significantly
    smaller than my modern QBP cable end.

    It does not look like a viable option to leave the cable end anything
    less than firmly seated in it's notch. Is there an elegant solution?

    If I understand you correctly, you're talking about the straddle cable
    that connects to both cantilever arms. These are derailleur cables.

    One end is bolted to the arm; for the other you need a
    doohickey[1]threaded on the end of the cable to engage the cantilever
    arms. See photo: http://home.comcast.net/~mandmlj/MafacStraddle.jpg
    (Photo from a 1980 Mafac tandem cantilever brake arm)

    Notice how the "doohickey" keeps the cantilever arms from spreading and
    letting the cable slip through.

    I'm guessing that you're using a more modern straddle that has a *large*
    lug on one end.

    Hope this helps,

    Mark Janeba

    Add footnote:
    [1] I'm not too eloquent today. What the heck *is* this thing called?

    -MJ

  3. Mark Janeba said:
    Mark Janeba said:
    !Jones said:

    Mafac straddle cables:

    In the days of old (like about 1980 or so), were the barrel ends of
    brake cables a different size than they are today?

    The reason I ask is because I'm setting up some Mafac cantilever
    brakes from that era and the barrel ends are not seating. The notch
    in the cantilever arm that receives the cable end is significantly
    smaller than my modern QBP cable end.

    It does not look like a viable option to leave the cable end anything
    less than firmly seated in it's notch. Is there an elegant solution?

    If I understand you correctly, you're talking about the straddle cable
    that connects to both cantilever arms. These are derailleur cables.

    One end is bolted to the arm; for the other you need a
    doohickey[1]threaded on the end of the cable to engage the cantilever
    arms. See photo: http://home.comcast.net/~mandmlj/MafacStraddle.jpg
    (Photo from a 1980 Mafac tandem cantilever brake arm)

    Notice how the "doohickey" keeps the cantilever arms from spreading and
    letting the cable slip through.

    I'm guessing that you're using a more modern straddle that has a *large*
    lug on one end.

    Hope this helps,

    Mark Janeba

    Add footnote:
    [1] I'm not too eloquent today. What the heck *is* this thing called?

    -MJ

    Dear Mark,

    It's a retaining or stop fitting. If threaded to screw onto
    the end of a Honda rear brake rod, it can be called a
    retaining or stop nut.

    Doohickey and dingus, however, are the preferred technical
    terms for simpler parts that fit onto more complicated
    thingamabobs or gizmos.

    Thesauristically,

    Carl Fogel

  4. A shy person said:
    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Mafac straddle cables:

    In the days of old (like about 1980 or so), were the barrel ends of
    brake cables a different size than they are today?

    The reason I ask is because I'm setting up some Mafac cantilever
    brakes from that era and the barrel ends are not seating. The notch
    in the cantilever arm that receives the cable end is significantly
    smaller than my modern QBP cable end.

    It does not look like a viable option to leave the cable end anything
    less than firmly seated in it's notch.

    Right.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Is there an elegant solution?



    Mark Janeba plied again:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    If I understand you correctly, you're talking about the straddle cable
    that connects to both cantilever arms. These are derailleur cables.

    One end is bolted to the arm; for the other you need a
    doohickey[1]threaded on the end of the cable to engage the cantilever
    arms. See photo: http://home.comcast.net/~mandmlj/MafacStraddle.jpg
    (Photo from a 1980 Mafac tandem cantilever brake arm)

    Notice how the "doohickey" keeps the cantilever arms from spreading
    and letting the cable slip through.

    I'm guessing that you're using a more modern straddle that has a
    *large* lug on one end.

    Add footnote:
    [1] I'm not too eloquent today. What the heck *is* this thing called?

    We call it a "Transverse Adaptor' part #MAF59.

    We have 'em in stock, see: http://sheldonbrown.com/harris/mafac.html

    Sheldon "Manufacture Auvergnoise de Freins et Accessoires pour Cycle" Brown
    +------------------------------------+
    | France, France...if not for you, |
    | the world would be alone! |
    | --Victor Hugo |
    +------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

  5. "Nec laudas nisi mortuos poetas: tanti non est, ut palceam, perire. -
    Martial

    Quoted message said:

    Doohickey and dingus, however, are the preferred technical
    terms for simpler parts that fit onto more complicated
    thingamabobs or gizmos.

    Thesauristically,

    Carl Fogel

    They might be the common words in use within your cloistered world of
    motorcycles and bicycles, but other fields have jargon of their own.
    For instance, the years I spent in one-design sailing introduced me to
    the world of snivvies and dammits.

    It's not easy to develop the nuances of how snivvies and dammits
    differ from gizmos and doohickies (other than their nautical
    provenance) except to say that my experience suggests that your
    sailboat can generally be rigged to work with the snivvies and dammits
    at hand, whereas most bicycles or motorcycles are rendered inoperable
    unless you have the exact thingamabob.

    -------------------------------
    John Dacey
    Business Cycles, Miami, Florida
    http://www.businesscycles.com
    Since 1983
    Our catalog of track equipment: online since 1996
    -------------------------------

  6. Quoth Carl Fogel:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Doohickey and dingus, however, are the preferred technical
    terms for simpler parts that fit onto more complicated
    thingamabobs or gizmos.

    John Dacey observed:

    Quoted message said:


    They might be the common words in use within your cloistered world of
    motorcycles and bicycles, but other fields have jargon of their own.
    For instance, the years I spent in one-design sailing introduced me to
    the world of snivvies and dammits.

    It's not easy to develop the nuances of how snivvies and dammits
    differ from gizmos and doohickies (other than their nautical
    provenance) except to say that my experience suggests that your
    sailboat can generally be rigged to work with the snivvies and dammits
    at hand, whereas most bicycles or motorcycles are rendered inoperable
    unless you have the exact thingamabob.

    My wife uses "frobs" for these applications. I think that's something
    she learned at MIT...

    Sheldon "'Truc' En Français" Brown
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Also, are you familiar with the PTF-PTM manufacturing technique? |
    | (This term comes from the bridge-building industry.) Stands for |
    | "pound to fit, paint to match." --Steve Palincsar |
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

  7. Sheldon Brown said:

    Quoth Carl Fogel:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Doohickey and dingus, however, are the preferred technical
    terms for simpler parts that fit onto more complicated
    thingamabobs or gizmos.

    John Dacey observed:

    Quoted message said:


    They might be the common words in use within your cloistered world of
    motorcycles and bicycles, but other fields have jargon of their own.
    For instance, the years I spent in one-design sailing introduced me to
    the world of snivvies and dammits.

    It's not easy to develop the nuances of how snivvies and dammits
    differ from gizmos and doohickies (other than their nautical
    provenance) except to say that my experience suggests that your
    sailboat can generally be rigged to work with the snivvies and dammits
    at hand, whereas most bicycles or motorcycles are rendered inoperable
    unless you have the exact thingamabob.

    My wife uses "frobs" for these applications. I think that's something
    she learned at MIT...

    Sheldon "'Truc' En Français" Brown
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Also, are you familiar with the PTF-PTM manufacturing technique? |
    | (This term comes from the bridge-building industry.) Stands for |
    | "pound to fit, paint to match." --Steve Palincsar |
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

    Dear Sheldon,

    Frobably a product of the search for a grand unified theory.

    Carl Fogel

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.