General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 13 posts · 387 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 March 2004
Last activity
5 March 2004
Original author
Jan
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
387
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 3/2/2004 9:24 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    As this is a classic example of how Jan Drew tries to divert a
    conversation when she has nothing substantive to say

    No, it is to show the hypocrite that you are.

    There was no diversion, qualifications were brought up by YOU and the *GANG*.

    Quoted message said:

    I will open a
    small [censored] in my moratorium and reply. Janisms demonstrated here are:

    Poor Peter, he brought up qualifications and now the subject becomes Jan.

    While he talks of diversion.

    Just another example of transference of weakness to others.

    <snip rant abouut Jan>

    Because Peter is caught once again being a tootal hypocrite and qualifications
    are only absolutely necessary for anyone EXCEPT himself, then just being a
    concerned citizens will do.

    Jan gets right down to bsiness and tells it like it is, Peter then rants, and
    it changes nothing.

    Peter has NO medical qualifications, he is NOT QUALIFIED to judge what is
    quackery.

    Period.

    Jan

  2. (Jan) said:

    Peter has NO medical qualifications, he is NOT QUALIFIED to judge what is
    quackery.

    What qualifications does Jan have in judging what is mercury
    poisoning? Oooops.

    Aloha,

    Rich

    Quoted message said:


    Jan

    -------------------------------------------------
    -------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance

  3. (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 3/2/2004 9:24 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    As this is a classic example of how Jan Drew tries to divert a
    conversation when she has nothing substantive to say

    No, it is to show the hypocrite that you are.

    There was no diversion, qualifications were brought up by YOU and the *GANG*.

    Quoted message said:

    I will open a
    small [censored] in my moratorium and reply. Janisms demonstrated here are:

    Poor Peter, he brought up qualifications and now the subject becomes Jan.

    I did not bring up the subject of qualifications. Ex-Dr Sandra Cabot
    has medical qualifications which would allow her to practice anywhere
    in Australia if she still had a licence. What I said was that she does
    not have a degree called "MD". She has two degrees called "MB,BS". She
    is perfectly entitled to put these letters after her name and use them
    on the covers of her books. She is not entitled to put "MD" after her
    name.

    Forget about the subject becoming Jan. You made the subject me. If I
    want to talk about my university qualifications I put BA, GDTM after
    my name. I don't lie and pretend that my degrees are called something
    else.

    Quoted message said:

    While he talks of diversion.

    Just another example of transference of weakness to others.

    <snip rant abouut Jan>

    Because Peter is caught once again being a tootal hypocrite and qualifications
    are only absolutely necessary for anyone EXCEPT himself, then just being a
    concerned citizens will do.

    Jan gets right down to bsiness and tells it like it is, Peter then rants, and
    it changes nothing.

    Peter has NO medical qualifications, he is NOT QUALIFIED to judge what is
    quackery.

    Period.

    Jan

    --
    Peter Bowditch
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
    and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

  4. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 3/3/2004 2:32 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 3/2/2004 9:24 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    As this is a classic example of how Jan Drew tries to divert a
    conversation when she has nothing substantive to say

    No, it is to show the hypocrite that you are.

    There was no diversion, qualifications were brought up by YOU and the


    *GANG*.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    I will open a
    small [censored] in my moratorium and reply. Janisms demonstrated here are:

    Poor Peter, he brought up qualifications and now the subject becomes Jan.

    I did not bring up the subject of qualifications.

    You must certainly did!

    <snip repeated>

    Quoted message said:

    Forget about the subject becoming Jan.

    Oh? Change you mind??

    Quoted message said:

    You made the subject me.

    That's correct, and your being a total hypocrite.

    Quoted message said:

    If I
    want to talk about my university qualifications I put BA, GDTM after
    my name. I don't lie and pretend that my degrees are called something
    else.

    You have NO MEDICAL qualifications to make judgements on quackery.

    You have NO MEDICAL qualiifications to speak on medical matters at any
    conferences.

    Of course, we all know what kind of conference it was and why.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    While he talks of diversion.

    Quoted message said:

    Just another example of transference of weakness to others.

    Quoted message said:

    <snip rant abouut Jan>

    Quoted message said:


    Because Peter is caught once again being a tootal hypocrite and


    qualifications

    Quoted message said:

    are only absolutely necessary for anyone EXCEPT himself, then just being a
    concerned citizens will do.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Jan gets right down to bsiness and tells it like it is, Peter then rants,


    and

    Quoted message said:

    it changes nothing.

    Peter has NO medical qualifications, he is NOT QUALIFIED to judge what is
    quackery.

    Period.

    Jan

  5. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset
    From: [email hidden] (Jan)
    Date: 3/3/2004 12:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualifications to make judgements on quackery.

    You have NO MEDICAL qualiifications to speak on medical

    funny that YOU should say that about someone else Janny

    YOU who has NO qualifications of ANY sort (beyond sandbox 01) who continually
    butts into every thread with totally off the wall and non relevant "medical"
    info due to your ignorance of anything even remotely resembling human anatomy
    and physiology..

    then stamping your feet and calling names..when the "educated" members here
    call you on it...

    or totally ignoring a question when you are caught like a deer in headlights

    LIKE....care to answer MY comments about the ludicrious example you posted
    about the poor child with a double renal system and resulting bowel
    impactions??

    likely you didn't understand the significance of having all that plumbing
    apparatus in there....whilst many ...if not ..most of the rest of us
    did...ie..making your ONE sample treatiste meaningless to the discussion at
    hand

    Iknow..now I get the "my ego" lecture...if MYego causes me to correct (belittle
    in your words)..stuff you post...what is YOUR excuse??

    anyone..anyone!! who doesn't LOL at the words and thoughts of Hulda Clark is a
    bit light in the loafers..at this point..you are not even wearing shoes..

    give it up lady...maybe you can volunteer to read to infants..

    hawki.....

  6. (Jan) said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualifications to make judgements on quackery.

    You have NO MEDICAL qualiifications to speak on medical matters at any
    conferences.

    Says Jan Drew, the advertizing agency for the naturopath mafia, the
    very same jan Drew, wo lies and forges.

    Jan Drew is a shmaame for the human race.

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    Die Noni-Connection : http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_wies.htm
    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_no15.htm http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_no12.htm
    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_noni.htm http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_non5.htm
    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_non4.htm http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_non6.htm

  7. [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

    <snip repetitious [censored]>

    Quoted message said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualifications to make judgements on quackery.

    And you do?

    Quoted message said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualiifications to speak on medical matters at any
    conferences.

    And you do?

    Quoted message said:

    Of course, we all know what kind of conference it was and why.

    Tell us about the conference. How many people spoke about medical
    quackery? Who were they? What did the other speakers talk about? Did
    Penn Jilette use bad words? What did Teller teach when he was a
    teacher? What aspects of quackery were highlighted in Dr Plait's talk?
    What didn't you like about Dr Scott's speech? Do you disagree with Dr
    Park? Were Dr Beiesdorfer's shirts more colourful than mine? Do you
    think that it was appropriate for Dr Carroll to mention my shirts?
    Should Dr Bidlack be criticised for introducing me as Dr Bowditch and
    then telling everyone that the degree was a fake?

    Tell us.

    --
    Peter Bowditch
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
    and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

  8. Peter Bowditch said:

    [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

    <snip repetitious [censored]>

    Quoted message said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualifications to make judgements on quackery.

    And you do?

    Cue Jan to say that she is not on a quackery committee or to accuse
    you of diversion.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualiifications to speak on medical matters at any
    conferences.

    And you do?

    Cue Jan to say the same.

    Cue Jan to pretend she is not reading my post but then inexplicably
    and gratuitously attack me from behind her imaginary kill file.

    Aloha,

    Rich
    -------------------------------------------------
    -------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance

  9. Feel better now?

    "Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset
    From: [email hidden] (Jan)
    Date: 3/3/2004 12:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualifications to make judgements on quackery.

    You have NO MEDICAL qualiifications to speak on medical

    funny that YOU should say that about someone else Janny

    YOU who has NO qualifications of ANY sort (beyond sandbox 01) who


    continually

    Quoted message said:

    butts into every thread with totally off the wall and non relevant


    "medical"

    Quoted message said:

    info due to your ignorance of anything even remotely resembling human


    anatomy

    Quoted message said:

    and physiology..

    then stamping your feet and calling names..when the "educated" members


    here

    Quoted message said:

    call you on it...

    or totally ignoring a question when you are caught like a deer in


    headlights

    Quoted message said:


    LIKE....care to answer MY comments about the ludicrious example you posted
    about the poor child with a double renal system and resulting bowel
    impactions??

    likely you didn't understand the significance of having all that plumbing
    apparatus in there....whilst many ...if not ..most of the rest of us
    did...ie..making your ONE sample treatiste meaningless to the discussion


    at

    Quoted message said:

    hand

    Iknow..now I get the "my ego" lecture...if MYego causes me to correct


    (belittle

    Quoted message said:

    in your words)..stuff you post...what is YOUR excuse??

    anyone..anyone!! who doesn't LOL at the words and thoughts of Hulda Clark


    is a

    Quoted message said:

    bit light in the loafers..at this point..you are not even wearing shoes..

    give it up lady...maybe you can volunteer to read to infants..

    hawki.....

  10. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

    <snip repetitious [censored]>

    Quoted message said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualifications to make judgements on quackery.

    Peter B:

    Quoted message said:

    And you do?

    Neither does Dan Burton....

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualiifications to speak on medical matters at any
    conferences.

    Peter B:

    Quoted message said:

    And you do?

    Neither does Dan Burton....

    Quoted message said:

    Did Penn Jilette use bad words?

    Do gestures count?

  11. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 3/3/2004 2:33 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

    <snip repetitious [censored]>

    Otay.

    <snip>

  12. (Jan) said:

    You have NO MEDICAL qualifications to make judgements on quackery.

    You have NO MEDICAL qualiifications to speak on medical matters at any
    conferences.

    Says Jan Drew, the advertizing agency for the naturopath mafia, the
    very same jan Drew, wo lies and forges.

    Jan Drew is a shame for the human race.

    More about the naturopath mafia advertizing agency Jan Drew :

    http://www.geocities.com/naturopathicmafia/Quackery.html

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    Die Noni-Connection : http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_wies.htm
    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_no15.htm http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_no12.htm
    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_noni.htm http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_non5.htm
    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_non4.htm http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_non6.htm

  13. [email hidden] (Jan) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Liver/ gall bladder flush NOT! recommended at outset
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 3/3/2004 2:33 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

    <snip repetitious [censored]>

    Otay.

    <snip>

    Another absolutely STUNNING comeback from the Janster! We are all
    awestruck by your clever use of logic to reply to Peter B's questions.
    Bravo, Jan, bravo.

    Mark, MD

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.