General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Let me introduce myself

Started by Craig Oldfield · · Last activity · 6 posts · 253 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
8 February 2006
Last activity
9 February 2006
Original author
Craig Oldfield
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
253
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    I am Oilfield.

    First name Craig.

    I am a very hard man (to please).

    Where's the FAQ 'n' charter for this group?

    Does Phil Oilfield still post here?

    And what of ah Oilfield?

    Does Brian {Hamilton Oilfield} still reside herein, or was he spanked
    out of here by that unmentionable scouser?

    And where is Sherilyn Oilfield?

    Come on fellers - this used to be my family home. We all lived here. I
    regret, as much as anyone does, the way we
    ostracised/ignored/marginalsed Richard, but he was exhibiting a family
    trait. It recurs. Aunty Jean had it. The cousins had it. Richard had
    it.

    There was nothing any of us could have done. It WASN'T ALICE'S FAULT!

    Btw. Brian {Hamilton Oilfield} left a residue, as Oilfields do.
    Is it right to set alight the residue of an obsolete Oilfield?
    ____

    Paul Rooney

    "Rooney is one of these vandals and has done his utmost to help trash dl and the
    other groups which he regularly crossposts to. He's created a false FAQ
    and charter" (Chris Lawrence in uk.rec.walking)

    "Also long time d.l. reader (but never feel robust enough to post much,
    especially since Rooney wrecked the group." (Rachel Sullivan in uk.rec.walking)


    More [censored] from the yellow Rooney. Too scared to meet Chris Hill for a
    walk. What a yellow slimey little scumbag Rooney is. What a pathetic
    excuse for a man as he continues to insult and harass the partner of
    somebody who died recently. No wonder the sleazey little git won't show
    up on any walks with you guys, he's obviously so ashamed of being such a
    snot nosed coward that he prefers to stay under his rock. What's the
    betting he was bullied as a child?
    --
    Craig Oldfield

  2. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Craig Oldfield


    Craig, I've snipped your entire post. It had sod all to do with
    walking. *Please* keep your arguments away from this newsgroup - WE ARE
    NOT INTERESTED.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Craig Oldfield


    Craig, I've snipped your entire post. It had sod all to do with
    walking. *Please* keep your arguments away from this newsgroup - WE ARE
    NOT INTERESTED.


    And I'm not interested in reading abuse from the headcase Rooney, nor
    his forgeries so we appear to hold similar views. Don't worry, I have no
    intention of continuing to post the [censored] he spews into here, I think
    I've made my point.
    --
    Craig Oldfield

  4. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Craig Oldfield


    Craig, I've snipped your entire post. It had sod all to do with
    walking. *Please* keep your arguments away from this newsgroup - WE ARE
    NOT INTERESTED.


    And I'm not interested in reading abuse from the headcase Rooney, nor
    his forgeries so we appear to hold similar views. Don't worry, I have no
    intention of continuing to post the [censored] he spews into here, I think
    I've made my point.


    Craig, I'm sorry but I can't see what your point is. Paul hasn't posted
    here for a while as far as I can make out, and whatever it was you were
    replying to didn't appear in urw. This means that readers of this NG
    don't actually know what you're talking about because your post came out
    of the blue. I enjoy your posts and those of the other demonites who
    turned up here a bit back - we made some new friends and it all seemed
    to be turning out well - and I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd be more
    than happy to see you all more often now that things have calmed down.
    The thing is, not only haven't we seen Paul for a while, he hasn't
    actually done anything to upset the apple cart in this NG. I accept
    that there have been problems elsewhere, and I admit that I have changed
    my opinion of Paul since Pedt's post because I know Pedt well enough to
    know that he wouldn't be saying the sort of things that he did were
    there not means of substantiating them. It does seem to remain a fact
    though that your post didn't appear to be related to anything that had
    gone before, therefore you can hardly blame people for thinking that
    yours was an argument spilling over into foreign territory. People here
    will have found their own ways of dealing with the information we were
    given when the last spate of unpleasantness reared its head - maybe we
    should just leave it at that?
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

  5. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    yours was an argument spilling over into foreign territory. People here
    will have found their own ways of dealing with the information we were
    given when the last spate of unpleasantness reared its head - maybe we
    should just leave it at that?

    It has been left, Fran. I had no intention of annoying people here by
    posting everything rooney posted to d.l I've also made a point of not
    incluing the usual nutter groups to which Rooney crossposts. I set FUs
    to urw in the full knowledge that the threads would die the death here
    very quickly and finally the point I was making was that after his
    laying low for a while, i fully expected rooney to try to wheedle his
    way back here, portraying himself as the injured party, I merely wanted
    to re-affirm the facts that he is just a nasty little man with mental
    problems to the point of obsession with myself, Chris etc. Please don't
    anyone her be taken in with anything he posts, his true character has
    been revealed by his posts elsewhere.
    Subject closed or take to e-mail.
    --
    Craig Oldfield

  6. [email hidden] said...

    Quoted message said:

    Subject closed or take to e-mail.


    For this particular subject I reckon closed is the better bet.
    --
    To reply see 'from' in headers; lose the domain, and insert dots and @
    where common sense dictates.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.