General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: 'Laetrile' in science

Started by Anth · · Last activity · 8 posts · 324 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 July 2003
Last activity
2 August 2003
Original author
Anth
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
324
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Even more interesting is the book World Without Cancer which shows how
    Laetrile was suppressed.
    And the lies and assumptions told.
    Anth

    "Hawki63" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: 'Laetrile' in science
    From: "Anth" [email hidden]
    Date: 7/29/2003 12:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?holding=npg&cmd=Retrieve

    interesting...
    hawki

  2. Quoted message said:

    Even more interesting is the book World Without Cancer which shows how
    Laetrile was suppressed.
    And the lies and assumptions told.
    Anth

    Laetrile was "suppressed" because it poisons and kills people as opposed to
    selectively poisoning cancer cells. It doesn't work.

  3. It is no myth and you can ask my aunt.

    Oops. Sorry, She is dead. Poisoned by laetrile.

    Anth said:

    That is a myth.
    Most Chemotherapy drugs poison people.
    Anth

    "Ilsa9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Even more interesting is the book World Without Cancer which shows how
    Laetrile was suppressed.
    And the lies and assumptions told.
    Anth

    Laetrile was "suppressed" because it poisons and kills people as opposed

    to

    Quoted message said:

    selectively poisoning cancer cells. It doesn't work.

  4. Was she taking any mainstream treatments like chemotherapy?
    Anth

    "Mark Probert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It is no myth and you can ask my aunt.

    Oops. Sorry, She is dead. Poisoned by laetrile.

    Anth said:

    That is a myth.
    Most Chemotherapy drugs poison people.
    Anth

    "Ilsa9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    >Even more interesting is the book World Without Cancer which shows how
    >Laetrile was suppressed.
    >And the lies and assumptions told.
    >Anth
    >

    Laetrile was "suppressed" because it poisons and kills people as opposed

    to

    Quoted message said:

    selectively poisoning cancer cells. It doesn't work.


  5. She had been taking chemo, which was shrinking her tumor. She stopped it
    when she was *sold* on laetrile by a murderer. Many months later, she
    died. There is no chemotherapy issue.

    And, I get really [censored] with this subject.

    Laetrile purveyors are murderers.

    Anth said:

    Was she taking any mainstream treatments like chemotherapy?
    Anth

    "Mark Probert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It is no myth and you can ask my aunt.

    Oops. Sorry, She is dead. Poisoned by laetrile.

    Anth said:

    That is a myth.
    Most Chemotherapy drugs poison people.
    Anth

    "Ilsa9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    >>Even more interesting is the book World Without Cancer which shows how
    >>Laetrile was suppressed.
    >>And the lies and assumptions told.
    >>Anth
    >>
    >
    >Laetrile was "suppressed" because it poisons and kills people as opposed

    to

    >selectively poisoning cancer cells. It doesn't work.
    >

  6. My mam was killed also - you don't realise how much that pisses me off.
    Anth

    "Mark Probert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    She had been taking chemo, which was shrinking her tumor. She stopped it
    when she was *sold* on laetrile by a murderer. Many months later, she
    died. There is no chemotherapy issue.

    And, I get really [censored] with this subject.

    Laetrile purveyors are murderers.

    Anth said:

    Was she taking any mainstream treatments like chemotherapy?
    Anth

    "Mark Probert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It is no myth and you can ask my aunt.

    Oops. Sorry, She is dead. Poisoned by laetrile.

    Anth wrote:

    >That is a myth.
    >Most Chemotherapy drugs poison people.
    >Anth
    >
    >"Ilsa9" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >news:[email hidden]...
    >
    >
    >>>Even more interesting is the book World Without Cancer which shows


    how

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>Laetrile was suppressed.
    >>>And the lies and assumptions told.
    >>>Anth
    >>>
    >>
    >>Laetrile was "suppressed" because it poisons and kills people as


    opposed

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >
    >to
    >
    >
    >>selectively poisoning cancer cells. It doesn't work.
    >>
    >
    >
    >


  7. "Anth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My mam was killed also - you don't realise how much that pisses me off.
    Anth

    *recently* and it's very paintful
    By a procedure which carried some 'insignificant small risk.'
    My mother signed a disclaimer so the hospital could cover it's [censored] in the
    event of anything going wrong.
    That 'insignificant risk' came into action and she died of fecal
    periotonitus, caused by a ruptured bowel which they couldn't even fix.

    I asked them what was the chance of her surviving the night they said 0
    I asked them what was the chance of her surviving the night if they operated
    they said 0.
    I asked them what was the chance of my mother being alive if they had not
    put the stent in her bowel?
    They said she would more than likely have been alive.

    Your auntie made a choice like my mother did.
    You have a legal case, I don't.

    I have no father no mother (both died of cancer at the same hospital within
    a few months of each other)

    Now you can see why I am looking for 'the truth'
    Anth

  8. so sorry to hear this...

    I would get a lawyer's opinion anyway....signing a consent does NOT give any
    health professional a blank check for malpractice.....

    just my .02....you may need mediation...

    good luck..

    putting a stent in the bowel cannot be determined to have "insigificant
    risk"....

    hawki

    hawki

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.