Re: Kill Bill (in Forté Agent) Vol. 1

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:25:40 -0500, [email hidden] wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

Is this not you?

Davidson, William
9 Jefferson St.
Westfield, MA 01085-2823

Sure is! Come on over me.

Better bring your gun dumbass, you'll need it.

I leave those sorts of things up to the legal authorities.

John Hanson said:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:25:40 -0500, [email hidden] wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:07:42 -0600, John Hanson
<[email hidden]> wrote:

>Is this not you?
>
>Davidson, William
>9 Jefferson St.
>Westfield, MA 01085-2823

Sure is! Come on over me.

Better bring your gun dumbass, you'll need it.

I leave those sorts of things up to the legal authorities.

BTW, using the method discussed in the original post, I just killed 16
of Bill's posts without removing a single one of yours, despite the
fact that he's using your name and email address. I imagine he's
desperately trying to find a way to modify his X-Trace header, and
he's really [censored] that he can't do it.

JMW said:

BTW, using the method discussed in the original post, I just killed 16
of Bill's posts without removing a single one of yours, despite the
fact that he's using your name and email address. I imagine he's
desperately trying to find a way to modify his X-Trace header, and
he's really [censored] that he can't do it.

First you're lieing through your ass. Secondly he could change it by
simply using one of my other newsreaders, google, or a few other ways
I won't divulge. See unlike you, I know when to STFU.

John Hanson said:

JMW said:

BTW, using the method discussed in the original post, I just killed 16
of Bill's posts without removing a single one of yours, despite the
fact that he's using your name and email address. I imagine he's
desperately trying to find a way to modify his X-Trace header, and
he's really [censored] that he can't do it.

First you're lieing through your ass. Secondly he could change it by
simply using one of my other newsreaders, google, or a few other ways
I won't divulge. See unlike you, I know when to STFU.

I thought you might respond, so I decided to read the above post
before killing it. Now let's see if the method works on this one ...

[pause]

Yep. I'll be publishing it on my website soon, and if you do have
another change in the X-Trace header like you did on March 6th, I'll
just publish the newest search string.

BTW, Bill you don't need to "divulge" anything. I've been doing this
stuff for much longer than you; your methods are childish and
elementary; and many of us recognize immediately when you lie about
your capabilities because we already know what the limitations of
certain methods are.

But feel free to keep trying. Your desperation is entertaining.

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:45:12 -0500, JMW
<[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

John Hanson said:

JMW said:

BTW, using the method discussed in the original post, I just killed 16
of Bill's posts without removing a single one of yours, despite the
fact that he's using your name and email address. I imagine he's
desperately trying to find a way to modify his X-Trace header, and
he's really [censored] that he can't do it.

First you're lieing through your ass. Secondly he could change it by
simply using one of my other newsreaders, google, or a few other ways
I won't divulge. See unlike you, I know when to STFU.

I thought you might respond, so I decided to read the above post
before killing it. Now let's see if the method works on this one ...

[pause]

Yep. I'll be publishing it on my website soon, and if you do have
another change in the X-Trace header like you did on March 6th, I'll
just publish the newest search string.

BTW, Bill you don't need to "divulge" anything. I've been doing this
stuff for much longer than you; your methods are childish and
elementary; and many of us recognize immediately when you lie about
your capabilities because we already know what the limitations of
certain methods are.

But feel free to keep trying. Your desperation is entertaining.

It's kind of funny how it DOESN'T change. Perhaps Scott Munger with
Highwinds-media.com is doing something about Bill.

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

[...]

re TBR

Quoted message said:

I thought you might respond,

I'll just bet you did.

Quoted message said:

so I decided to read the above post before killing it.

JMW, cowboy, "I killed a post just to see it die." (insert whistling à
la TGTB and TU)

[...]

Quoted message said:

BTW, Bill you don't need to "divulge" anything. I've
been doing this stuff for much longer than you; your
methods are childish and <snip>

Speaking of your so-called methods, it's interesting to see how very
ineffective they've proven to be. Here you are filling up MFW and
rec.running as well with evidence of your killfile prowess. Wait, no,
make that a marked lack of evidence as, it seems, TBR is still around
and getting more attention than ever.

You're... ridiculous.

Quoted message said:

Your desperation is entertaining.

As is yours, John.

Give it (and everyone else) a rest.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Hey said:

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

[...]

re TBR

Quoted message said:

I thought you might respond,

I'll just bet you did.

Quoted message said:

so I decided to read the above post before killing it.

JMW, cowboy, "I killed a post just to see it die." (insert whistling à
la TGTB and TU)

Poor Little Curt James! So desperate for attention! Are you now
resorting to Bill's methods?

Maybe you should just stick around Reeky and RAB. They don't find you
quite as annoying as we do.

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

re "Hey, stupid. Yes, you, JMW." <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Poor Little Curt James! So desperate for attention!
Are you now resorting to Bill's methods?

Why is it that you make so many references to this Bill character? You
can call me desperate for attention all you'd like, but it doesn't
change the facts of your actions - the troll faq, the seemingly
never-ending comments on killfiling someone you refuse to stop talking
about. You make little if any sense, imo.

Quoted message said:

Maybe you should just stick around Reeky and RAB.
They don't find you quite as annoying as
we do.

^^^^

I suspect your so-called /we/ does not include as many people as you'd
like. Many people, I suspect, are silently intelligent and simply
can't be bothered with your (and, yes, my) antics. More power to them.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

JMW said:

Yep. I'll be publishing it on my website soon, and if you do have
another change in the X-Trace header like you did on March 6th, I'll
just publish the newest search string.

I can change it at will, Will, so good luck.

Quoted message said:

BTW, Bill you don't need to "divulge" anything. I've been doing this
stuff for much longer than you; your methods are childish and
elementary; and many of us recognize immediately when you lie about
your capabilities because we already know what the limitations of
certain methods are.

You really are a complete idiot, aren't you? My capabilities are
proven daily, no hourly, while you work to keep up. My trolling is
effective if it keeps you busy. You strive, and therefore I am. I've
recently spent hundreds to insure my privacy, and freedom to do as I
please and not be hassled by my ISP or anyone else. You lose, again...

Quoted message said:

But feel free to keep trying. Your desperation is entertaining.

You can try the old "legal beagles are on you" or "I'm suing you" or
even the time-tested "I'm coming to kick your ass" routines, but none
will work. If you think the "you're not bothering me" statement works
when I can see the veins in your neck throbbing, tells me I'm doing
just fine.
Your ridiculous "troll faq" is more useful to me, than to anyone else.

John Hanson said:

It's kind of funny how it DOESN'T change. Perhaps Scott Munger with
Highwinds-media.com is doing something about Bill.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH I make funny...

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

BTW, using the method discussed in the original post, I just killed 16
of Bill's posts without removing a single one of yours, despite the
fact that he's using your name and email address. I imagine he's
desperately trying to find a way to modify his X-Trace header, and
he's really [censored] that he can't do it.

Any way to access those headers with outlook express? And filter on them?

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:25:40 -0500, [email hidden] wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:07:42 -0600, John Hanson
<[email hidden]> wrote:

>Is this not you?
>
>Davidson, William
>9 Jefferson St.
>Westfield, MA 01085-2823

Sure is! Come on over me.

Better bring your gun dumbass, you'll need it.

I leave those sorts of things up to the legal authorities.

Or the HA. I'd get them involved.

Lee Michaels said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

BTW, using the method discussed in the original post, I just killed 16
of Bill's posts without removing a single one of yours, despite the
fact that he's using your name and email address. I imagine he's
desperately trying to find a way to modify his X-Trace header, and
he's really [censored] that he can't do it.

Any way to access those headers with outlook express?

You cannot set it so they come up automatically. However, you can
view them this way:

Atl-Enter, click the Details tab

Quoted message said:

And filter on them?

I'm afraid not. Outlook Express does not provide a global search that
looks for text in *all* the messages in a folder.

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Lee Michaels said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

BTW, using the method discussed in the original post, I just killed 16
of Bill's posts without removing a single one of yours, despite the
fact that he's using your name and email address. I imagine he's
desperately trying to find a way to modify his X-Trace header, and
he's really [censored] that he can't do it.

Any way to access those headers with outlook express?

You cannot set it so they come up automatically. However, you can
view them this way:

Atl-Enter, click the Details tab

Quoted message said:

And filter on them?

I'm afraid not. Outlook Express does not provide a global search that
looks for text in *all* the messages in a folder.

Makes you kinda wonder just what Mr Bill was thinking when he made his
browser.

Lee Michaels said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Lee Michaels said:

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote
>
> BTW, using the method discussed in the original post, I just killed 16
> of Bill's posts without removing a single one of yours, despite the
> fact that he's using your name and email address. I imagine he's
> desperately trying to find a way to modify his X-Trace header, and
> he's really [censored] that he can't do it.

Any way to access those headers with outlook express?

You cannot set it so they come up automatically. However, you can
view them this way:

Atl-Enter, click the Details tab

Quoted message said:

And filter on them?

I'm afraid not. Outlook Express does not provide a global search that
looks for text in *all* the messages in a folder.

Makes you kinda wonder just what Mr Bill was thinking when he made his
browser.

Most commercial software groups don't care about Usenet. They can't
profit from it, and it presents the greatest risk for uncontrollable
piracy. There are many who wish that Usenet would disappear, largely
because it provides what our Defense Department wanted when it created
the predecessor to the Internet: a network that's accessible from many
points and cannot be defeated at any single point.

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:09:54 -0800, "Larry Hodges"
<[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:25:40 -0500, [email hidden] wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:21:33 -0500, [email hidden] wrote:

>On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:07:42 -0600, John Hanson
><[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Is this not you?
>>
>>Davidson, William
>>9 Jefferson St.
>>Westfield, MA 01085-2823
>
>Sure is! Come on over me.

Better bring your gun dumbass, you'll need it.

I leave those sorts of things up to the legal authorities.

Or the HA. I'd get them involved.

81 is sponsoring Team Minnesota this year.

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:09:54 -0800, "Larry Hodges"
<[email hidden]> wrote in misc.fitness.weights:

Quoted message said:

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:25:40 -0500, [email hidden] wrote in
misc.fitness.weights:

>On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:21:33 -0500, [email hidden] wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:07:42 -0600, John Hanson
>><[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>>Is this not you?
>>>
>>>Davidson, William
>>>9 Jefferson St.
>>>Westfield, MA 01085-2823
>>
>>Sure is! Come on over me.
>
>Better bring your gun dumbass, you'll need it.

I leave those sorts of things up to the legal authorities.

Or the HA. I'd get them involved.

81 is sponsoring Team Minnesota this year.

Set 'em up with a NG reader and introduce them to Bill. I'm sure they have
contacts where he lives. I'd do it if I had the contacts.

Larry Hodges said:

Set 'em up with a NG reader and introduce them to Bill. I'm sure they have
contacts where he lives. I'd do it if I had the contacts.

LMAO! You are "lucky Larry" today, because I could easily hurt you
physically, but I won't. LOSER!

"John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Larry Hodges said:

Set 'em up with a NG reader and introduce them to Bill. I'm sure they
have
contacts where he lives. I'd do it if I had the contacts.

LMAO! You are "lucky Larry" today, because I could easily hurt you
physically, but I won't. LOSER!

I wish you would try. Please...try.