Re: Hydrocolloids and gums

MU said:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:35:39 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous via the Cypherpunks

Tonga Remailer said:

Quoted message said:

Would you like to tell us about your "god", this mysteriously limited
whatever that does, well, what *does* your god do, Bob?

Your obsession with Bob is very revealing.

What is revealed?

[...]

Quoted message said:

You won't find Chung or Mu or many others slipping and dodging on anything
relevant to Usenet discussion.

Bwahahahahahahahahaha...

Perfect.

Fool.

Bob

Bob (this one) said:

Perfect.

My God is. Let's talk bout your "god".

You will still have refused to adresss this most prevalent issue regarding
your hate for Christ.

Answer the questions, Bob. You revel in making fun of Jesus and
Christianity, of my God, so why is it you duck off when I ask about your
god, Bob?

<reinsert>

You're correct, Bob. In the miniscule world you wish to place "god", in
your consistent attempts to define a supernatural being in the same
language you would a spaghetti recipe, in your self-centered pride that
allows you to justify your criticisms of a supernatural "god", yes, Bob,
your "god" IS incapable of damn near most anything.

My God, otoh, is capable of everything and anything and, imo, is so very
far past my even most expansive understanding of Him, I don't even have
much more than a glimpse of His abilities.

I must assume, your "god" created nothing at all much less the Universe,
the Heavens and all that is in it. If he did, them all of a sudden, he is
incapable of discerning free will inside his plan for mankind?

But your god didn't and hasn't done much of anything as far as I can see.

Would you like to tell us about your "god", this mysteriously limited
whatever that does, well, what *does* your god do, Bob?

MU said:

Bob (this one) said:

Perfect.

Let's talk bout your most prevalent issue regarding
your duck, Bob. In a spaghetti recipe.

Nah.

Bob

Bob (this one) said:

Nah.

Yeah.

Answer the questions, Bob. You revel in making fun of Jesus and
Christianity, of my God, so why is it you duck off when I ask about your
god, Bob?

You're correct, Bob. In the miniscule world you wish to place "god", in
your consistent attempts to define a supernatural being in the same
language you would a spaghetti recipe, in your self-centered pride that
allows you to justify your criticisms of a supernatural "god", yes, Bob,
your "god" IS incapable of damn near most anything.

My God, otoh, is capable of everything and anything and, imo, is so very
far past my even most expansive understanding of Him, I don't even have
much more than a glimpse of His abilities.

I must assume, your "god" created nothing at all much less the Universe,
the Heavens and all that is in it. If he did, them all of a sudden, he is
incapable of discerning free will inside his plan for mankind?

But your god didn't and hasn't done much of anything as far as I can see.

Would you like to tell us about your "god", this mysteriously limited
whatever that does, well, what *does* your "god" do, Bob?

Bob (this one) said:

MU said:

Bob (this one) said:

Perfect.

Let's talk bout your most prevalent issue regarding
your duck, Bob. In a spaghetti recipe.

Nah.

Really. Who eats duck with spaghetti???

Martha

--
"ALPO is 99 cents a can. That's over SEVEN dog dollars!!"
Revek - ASDLC

It seems to me I heard somewhere that MU wrote in article
<[email hidden]>:

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:35:39 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous via the Cypherpunks
Tonga Remailer wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Mu wrote earlier

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Would you like to tell us about your "god", this mysteriously limited
whatever that does, well, what *does* your god do, Bob?

Quoted message said:

Bob (that one up there) is a liar, a fraud and believes he is insulated
from having his own beliefs brought to bear while he TROLLS a Usenet
newsgroups preaching his constant hate message of Christ.

Quoted message said:

Usenet is a discussion forum. I want him to shut up long enough to discuss
his own beliefs. Bob abuses Usenet to TROLL hate messages about Christ
*without* having to stand the test of discussion.

So you don't believe in equal access for others to share their religious
views or lack of them while you, Chung, and others put a peculiar (look
up the meaning) spin on nearly every message you post? That ain't the
American way, kiddo.

And it's not the newsgroup way either, since it's way overboard on
offtopicicity.

[...]
--
Don
[email hidden]

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Bob (that one up there) is a liar, a fraud and believes he is insulated
from having his own beliefs brought to bear while he TROLLS a Usenet
newsgroups preaching his constant hate message of Christ.

Quoted message said:

Usenet is a discussion forum. I want him to shut up long enough to discuss
his own beliefs. Bob abuses Usenet to TROLL hate messages about Christ
*without* having to stand the test of discussion.

Don Kirkman said:

So you don't believe in equal access for others to share their religious
views or lack of them while you, Chung, and others put a peculiar (look
up the meaning) spin on nearly every message you post? That ain't the
American way, kiddo.

Most certainly do, adulto. I gess you missed this part I want him to shut
up long enough to discuss his own beliefs. Bob abuses Usenet to TROLL hate
messages about Christ *without* having to stand the test of discussion.

Would you like to discuss yours? In detail?

Quoted message said:

And it's not the newsgroup way either, since it's way overboard on
offtopicicity.

pffft

Don Kirkman <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

It seems to me I heard somewhere that MU wrote in article
<[email hidden]>:

Quoted message said:

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 20:35:39 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous via the Cypherpunks
Tonga Remailer wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Mu wrote earlier

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> Would you like to tell us about your "god", this mysteriously limited
> whatever that does, well, what *does* your god do, Bob?

Quoted message said:

Bob (that one up there) is a liar, a fraud and believes he is insulated
from having his own beliefs brought to bear while he TROLLS a Usenet
newsgroups preaching his constant hate message of Christ.

Quoted message said:

Usenet is a discussion forum. I want him to shut up long enough to discuss
his own beliefs. Bob abuses Usenet to TROLL hate messages about Christ
*without* having to stand the test of discussion.

So you don't believe in equal access for others to share their religious
views or lack of them while you, Chung, and others put a peculiar (look
up the meaning) spin on nearly every message you post? That ain't the
American way, kiddo.

And it's not the newsgroup way either, since it's way overboard on
offtopicicity.

[...]

yah but it was worth it for that non sequitor of Martha's

anon.

MU <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Bob (that one up there) is a liar, a fraud and believes he is insulated
from having his own beliefs brought to bear while he TROLLS a Usenet
newsgroups preaching his constant hate message of Christ.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Usenet is a discussion forum. I want him to shut up long enough to discuss
his own beliefs. Bob abuses Usenet to TROLL hate messages about Christ
*without* having to stand the test of discussion.

Don Kirkman said:

So you don't believe in equal access for others to share their religious
views or lack of them while you, Chung, and others put a peculiar (look
up the meaning) spin on nearly every message you post? That ain't the
American way, kiddo.

Most certainly do, adulto. I gess you missed this part I want him to shut
up long enough to discuss his own beliefs. Bob abuses Usenet to TROLL hate
messages about Christ *without* having to stand the test of discussion.

Would you like to discuss yours? In detail?

Quoted message said:

And it's not the newsgroup way either, since it's way overboard on
offtopicicity.

pffft

One of the things I've picked up from reading Bob's posts is that he
is deeply, privately and sincerely, a man of faith. Of all the people
on this newsgroup you might pick to try to discredit over
Christianity...

Incomprehensible.

Zee

MU said:

Don Kirkman said:

So you don't believe in equal access for others to share their religious
views or lack of them while you, Chung, and others put a peculiar (look
up the meaning) spin on nearly every message you post? That ain't the
American way, kiddo.

Most certainly do, adulto. I gess you missed this part I want him to shut
up long enough to discuss his own beliefs. Bob abuses Usenet to TROLL hate
messages about Christ *without* having to stand the test of discussion.

<LOL> Oh, MU_cilage wants! It's all in google. But it means having to
read posts that are longer than the 25 or so words that exhaust poor
MU_ffler and blow past his attention span.

MU_stache wants the rest of us to behave in the ways he says are
correct. <LOL> Right. That'll happen. As soon as he comes out into the
light of day and reveals himself. Until then, he's fodder. Playtime.
Pin the stupid on the fool.

"Discussion...?" Like the absolute pronouncements from MU_ckraker and
Chung that allow no deviation from their crippled, self-forgiving
perversion of Christianity. Sure. <LOL> Discussion. As if...

<LOL> Poor guy seems to think anybody actually gives a [censored] about his
opinion. Hilarious.

Bob