"Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported.
Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits" deserve to have MHL's.
You're a double moron. Ed made that statement -- and even that was tongue-in-cheek, as anyone with a modicum of understanding OR a sense of humor/irony would know.
"Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
jtaylor said:
"Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported.
Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits" deserve to have MHL's.
You're a double moron. Ed made that statement
To which post you and Ozark immediately concurred.
It appears that the three most vociferous (and foul-mouthed) pro-helmet zealots all wish MHL's on the "brits". Perhaps you think that America has rather too many of these laws, and could afford to give one away?
"Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
jtaylor wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits" deserve to have MHL's.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
You're a double moron. Ed made that statement
{hey, where did the rest go?!?}
Quoted message said:
To which post you and Ozark immediately concurred.
Allow me to put /back/ what I said:
"Ed made that statement -- and even that was tongue-in-cheek, as anyone with a modicum of understanding OR a sense of humor/irony would know."
Leaves you out, obviously.
Quoted message said:
It appears that the three most vociferous (and foul-mouthed) pro-helmet zealots all wish MHL's on the "brits". Perhaps you think that America has rather too many of these laws, and could afford to give one away?
I hear new medications are amazing these days. For God's sake go see your doctor.
"jtaylor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]!nnrp1.uunet.ca...
Quoted message said:
"Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
jtaylor said:
"Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
> > The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a > concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported. >
Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits" deserve to have MHL's.
You're a double moron. Ed made that statement
To which post you and Ozark immediately concurred.
It appears that the three most vociferous (and foul-mouthed) pro-helmet zealots all wish MHL's on the "brits". Perhaps you think that America has rather too many of these laws, and could afford to give one away?
However, given that you're the one who's cross-posting, it appears that you're wishing tedious unpleasant helmet flamewars on the Brits. We were quite enjoying the peace and quiet of being able to talk about recreational cycling for a while there.