UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: Here you go, Carl

Started by jtaylor · · Last activity · 7 posts · 240 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
15 June 2006
Last activity
15 June 2006
Original author
jtaylor
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
240
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a
    concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported.

    Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits"
    deserve to have MHL's.

  2. jtaylor said:

    "Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a
    concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported.

    Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits"
    deserve to have MHL's.

    Enough, already! It was nothing more than a throw-away remark. Stop
    stirring.

    --
    Dave...

  3. jtaylor said:

    "Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a
    concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported.

    Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits"
    deserve to have MHL's.

    You're a double moron. Ed made that statement -- and even that was
    tongue-in-cheek, as anyone with a modicum of understanding OR a sense of
    humor/irony would know.

    Keep flailing. Flailor.

  4. dkahn400 said:
    jtaylor said:

    "Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a
    concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported.

    Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the
    "brits" deserve to have MHL's.

    Enough, already! It was nothing more than a throw-away remark. Stop
    stirring.

    I really do think he's got OCD. Seriously.

    Maybe I'll start giving him the benefit of the doubt on these things. He's
    ill.

    Explains a lot...

  5. "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    jtaylor said:

    "Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a
    concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported.

    Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits"
    deserve to have MHL's.

    You're a double moron. Ed made that statement

    To which post you and Ozark immediately concurred.

    It appears that the three most vociferous (and foul-mouthed) pro-helmet
    zealots all wish MHL's on the "brits". Perhaps you think that America has
    rather too many of these laws, and could afford to give one away?

  6. jtaylor said:

    "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    jtaylor wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the
    "brits" deserve to have MHL's.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    You're a double moron. Ed made that statement

    {hey, where did the rest go?!?}

    Quoted message said:

    To which post you and Ozark immediately concurred.

    Allow me to put /back/ what I said:

    "Ed made that statement -- and even that was tongue-in-cheek, as anyone with
    a modicum of understanding OR a sense of humor/irony would know."

    Leaves you out, obviously.

    Quoted message said:

    It appears that the three most vociferous (and foul-mouthed)
    pro-helmet zealots all wish MHL's on the "brits". Perhaps you think
    that America has rather too many of these laws, and could afford to
    give one away?

    I hear new medications are amazing these days. For God's sake go see your
    doctor.

    Best of luck to you.

    BS (50-50)

  7. "jtaylor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]!nnrp1.uunet.ca...

    Quoted message said:


    "Sorni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    jtaylor said:

    "Jeff Starr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    >
    > The inclusion of the Brits has added another dimension, mostly a
    > concern of MHLs. Which no one here, I repeat NO ONE has supported.
    >

    Sorni and one other (Ozark?) have stated that they believe the "brits"
    deserve to have MHL's.

    You're a double moron. Ed made that statement

    To which post you and Ozark immediately concurred.

    It appears that the three most vociferous (and foul-mouthed) pro-helmet
    zealots all wish MHL's on the "brits". Perhaps you think that America has
    rather too many of these laws, and could afford to give one away?

    However, given that you're the one who's cross-posting, it appears that
    you're wishing tedious unpleasant helmet flamewars on the Brits. We were
    quite enjoying the peace and quiet of being able to talk about recreational
    cycling for a while there.

    A

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.