Why is this a bummer?
Ignoramus7404 said:What a bummer!
``The present study demonstrated that the addition of SF to the meal
resulted in lower postprandial glucose and insulin than when the meal
contained MUFA. Thus, SF may be useful in controlling postprandial
glucose.''Comparison of the effect of saturated and monounsaturated fat on
postprandial plasma glucose and insulin concentration in women with
gestational diabetes mellitus.Ilic S, Jovanovic L, Pettitt DJ.
Sansum Medical Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California 93105,
USA.The goal of this study was to determine whether the type of fat plays
a role in the glucose response to a meal, independent of the
carbohydrate content. Ten gestational diabetic women (gestational
weeks 29-34) who were well controlled on diet alone were randomized as
to the order in which they would eat a meal, after overnight fast,
containing saturated fat (SF) or monounsaturated fat (MUFA). Blood was
drawn at 0, 60, 120, and 180 min for plasma glucose, insulin, lipid
profile (triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol,
LDL-cholesterol, VLDL-cholesterol) and free fatty acids. After 2
weeks, each patient received the other type of meal. The test meal was
composed of 20% of the total daily caloric needs based on ideal body
weight. The area under the curve showed a significantly lower glucose
concentration for SF meal (p = 0.001). Serum insulin concentrations
followed the glucose response with the peak at the 60-min time point
and a significantly lower concentration at the 180-min time point in
the SF than in the MUFA group. The present study demonstrated that the
addition of SF to the meal resulted in lower postprandial glucose and
insulin than when the meal contained MUFA. Thus, SF may be useful in
controlling postprandial glucose.
--
Bob in CT
Remove ".x" to reply