Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Re: Ground Hugger steering mechanism

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 9 posts · 716 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
13 October 2005
Last activity
20 October 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
716
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. There is a U-joint where the steering shaft and steering tube of the
    fork meet.

  2. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    There is a U-joint where the steering shaft and steering tube of the
    fork meet.

    OK thanksalot. Appreciate it.

  3. I hope you're not thinking of building one of those bikes.

  4. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I hope you're not thinking of building one of those bikes.

    Why not? I think it looks really really low slung and comfy too.


  5. Quoted message said:

    Why not? I think it looks really really low slung and comfy too.

    Pay attention to the seating position. It is almost upright. That
    puts most of your weight on your butt which will result in numb
    feet/toes and a sore butt. This phenomenon is so common it has a
    name: "recumbutt".

    A more reclined seating position is far more comfortable, though you
    can go too far that way too.

    Long wheelbase bikes such as this are usually wobbly at low speeds and
    can get pretty scary on gravel/sand because the front wheel is so
    lightly loaded.

    There are many other bikes that would make much better "first"
    recumbents.

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Why not? I think it looks really really low slung and comfy too.

    Pay attention to the seating position. It is almost upright. That
    puts most of your weight on your butt which will result in numb
    feet/toes and a sore butt. This phenomenon is so common it has a
    name: "recumbutt".

    A more reclined seating position is far more comfortable, though you
    can go too far that way too.

    Long wheelbase bikes such as this are usually wobbly at low speeds and
    can get pretty scary on gravel/sand because the front wheel is so
    lightly loaded.

    There are many other bikes that would make much better "first"
    recumbents.

    Yes, you do have some pretty good points there.. Think I'll just consider
    those SWB entry level recumebents, the Taiwanese Actionbent models.

    Thanks once again.

  7. "MIn Kak" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I hope you're not thinking of building one of those bikes.

    Why not? I think it looks really really low slung and comfy too.

    Well the problem is few have actually been built so you would have no idea
    how well it rides until you build one.

  8. "Mark Leuck" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    "MIn Kak" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I hope you're not thinking of building one of those bikes.

    Why not? I think it looks really really low slung and comfy too.

    Well the problem is few have actually been built so you would have no idea
    how well it rides until you build one.

    Or how easy the construction methods are and well it holds up.

    Still it would be nice to have more (even one reported?) data
    point for this (relatively dated?) design.

    Jon Meinecke

  9. "Jon Meinecke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:1129721422.360ac402035fbd22a68c22ee18de8ea5@teranews...

    Quoted message said:

    "Mark Leuck" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    "MIn Kak" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > I hope you're not thinking of building one of those bikes.

    Why not? I think it looks really really low slung and comfy too.

    Well the problem is few have actually been built so you would have no


    idea

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    how well it rides until you build one.

    Or how easy the construction methods are and well it holds up.

    Still it would be nice to have more (even one reported?) data
    point for this (relatively dated?) design.

    Jon Meinecke

    I think what happens is people like the idea of constructing a bike until
    they have to start constructing one, then it ends up as that project they
    will someday finish sitting in the back of the garage

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.