Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Great drafting

Started by gds · · Last activity · 7 posts · 303 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 May 2007
Last activity
24 May 2007
Original author
gds
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
303
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Diablo Scott said:
    gds said:

    At 30 mph
    these trucks can stop a lot faster than you can on your bike.

    No they can't. Reaction time is an issue but not stopping distance.

    Best drafting ever: a roofing truck, thing must have been 15 feet high
    and sat low to the ground ... I was coasting at 40mph.

    What is your point?
    My point is that if you are drafting closely to a big truck at 30 mph
    and they brake hard without warning you have a good chance of running
    into it. Stopping involves both reaction time and stopping distance
    once braking is activated. Parsing out how much of the issue is
    reaction time vs. the physical act of stopping doesn't seem the
    important issue.

  2. gds said:
    Diablo Scott said:
    gds said:

    At 30 mph
    these trucks can stop a lot faster than you can on your bike.


    No they can't. Reaction time is an issue but not stopping distance.

    Best drafting ever: a roofing truck, thing must have been 15 feet high
    and sat low to the ground ... I was coasting at 40mph.

    What is your point?
    My point is that if you are drafting closely to a big truck at 30 mph
    and they brake hard without warning you have a good chance of running
    into it. Stopping involves both reaction time and stopping distance
    once braking is activated. Parsing out how much of the issue is
    reaction time vs. the physical act of stopping doesn't seem the
    important issue.

    My point was that your original statement was misleading; a bike can
    decelerate at a higher rate than a big truck.

    What this means is that any particular rider can draft a massive truck
    more closely than he can draft a smaller vehicle, with the same factor
    of safety.

    This post is not intended to promote dangerous riding of course.

  3. Diablo Scott said:
    gds said:
    Diablo Scott said:

    gds wrote:
    > At 30 mph
    > these trucks can stop a lot faster than you can on your bike.
    No they can't. Reaction time is an issue but not stopping distance.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Best drafting ever: a roofing truck, thing must have been 15 feet high
    and sat low to the ground ... I was coasting at 40mph.

    Quoted message said:

    What is your point?
    My point is that if you are drafting closely to a big truck at 30 mph
    and they brake hard without warning you have a good chance of running
    into it. Stopping involves both reaction time and stopping distance
    once braking is activated. Parsing out how much of the issue is
    reaction time vs. the physical act of stopping doesn't seem the
    important issue.

    My point was that your original statement was misleading; a bike can
    decelerate at a higher rate than a big truck.

    What this means is that any particular rider can draft a massive truck
    more closely than he can draft a smaller vehicle, with the same factor
    of safety.

    This post is not intended to promote dangerous riding of course.- Hide quoted text -

    - Show quoted text -

    And my original point was to make sure that the truck driver knows
    what you are doing and agrees to it. Then you shouldn't have to worry
    (asmuch)about sudden braking.
    As a matter of practice driver/rider cooperation is the key variable.
    Look at motor pacing with a motorcycle as part of training for speed.
    The motorcycle is much closer in size and weight to the bicycle than
    (almost) and car or truck. Yet the bicyclist will ride right up on the
    motorcycle. In fact once they have gotten speeds equalized the
    bicyclist will actually be able to bump his front wheel with the
    motorcyclist's rear wheel. Since they are turning at the same speed
    this works out OK. And since the motorcycle driver is a partner in the
    process and will drive in a manner consistent with the bicyclist's
    safety the event is prettty safe.

  4. "gds" clip) In fact once they have gotten speeds equalized the bicyclist
    will actually be able to bump his front wheel with the motorcyclist's rear
    wheel. Since they are turning at the same speed this works out OK. (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Where did you get that??? The rear of the motorcyclists tire is moving
    UPWARD. The front of the bicyclists tire is moving DOWNWARD. If they
    touch, the bicycle will be lifted upward.

  5. "gds" wrote: And my original point was to make sure that the truck driver
    knows what you are doing and agrees to it. Then you shouldn't have to worry
    (asmuch)about sudden braking. (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    There is a well-known rule, often posted on the backs of big trucks: "If
    you can't see me in my mirrors, I can't see you." If you are drafting a van
    or semi, chances you will be following too close, according to the above
    rule.

  6. On May 23, 7:39 pm, "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "gds" clip) In fact once they have gotten speeds equalized the bicyclist
    will actually be able to bump his front wheel with the motorcyclist's rear
    wheel. Since they are turning at the same speed this works out OK. (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Where did you get that??? The rear of the motorcyclists tire is moving
    UPWARD. The front of the bicyclists tire is moving DOWNWARD. If they
    touch, the bicycle will be lifted upward.

    I won't argue the physics. However, it is done all of the time. In
    practice the bike is not lifted up, you simply bump and fall back a
    small bit.I am not suggesting the bike tries to STAY in contact, just
    a bump. I know it works because I've done it (successfully). My
    earlier statement regarding theat it works becasue the wheels are
    turning at the same speed is probably not the reason it works since as
    you point out the contact is in different directions, so it is
    probably that the two vehicles are at (nearly) the same speed and the
    contact is short that this works OK.

  7. On May 23, 7:44 pm, "Leo Lichtman" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "gds" wrote: And my original point was to make sure that the truck driver

    knows what you are doing and agrees to it. Then you shouldn't have to worry
    (asmuch)about sudden braking. (clip)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    There is a well-known rule, often posted on the backs of big trucks: "If
    you can't see me in my mirrors, I can't see you." If you are drafting a van
    or semi, chances you will be following too close, according to the above
    rule.


    I agree! That is is accordane with my point that successfull drafting
    of a motor vehicle implies a cooperative effort. The exception to yor
    point "may" be when a coperting driver knows that a cyclist is
    drafting closely and agrees to not brake for a given period of time or
    to give a warning signal before braking.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.