Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Getting rid of joggers.

Fabrizio Mazzoleni · 2004-09-10T23:48:45+00:00

"Little Meow" wrote in message news:[email hidden]... . Then I see them on black MTBs, wearing non-garish tee and shorts, and sans foam topping. Once a FRED always a FRED. Just ignore those types, they look bad.

Started by Fabrizio Mazzoleni · 10 September 2004 · Last activity 13 September 2004 · 23 posts · 674 views

← Back to Road Cycling

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postRe: Getting rid of joggers.Fabrizio Mazzoleni · 10 Sep 2004 02 / This pagePosts 1–20Page 1 of 2 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #23Fabrizio Mazzoleni · 13 Sep 2004

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section: Road Cycling
Published: 10 September 2004
Last activity: 13 September 2004
Original author: Fabrizio Mazzoleni
Posts: 23
Discussion status: Public discussion
Total views: 674
Views / 30 days: 0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Original post
Fabrizio Mazzoleni
Archived post

10 September 2004, 23:48 UTC #1

"Little Meow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
. Then I see
them on black MTBs, wearing non-garish tee
and shorts, and sans foam topping.

Once a FRED always a FRED.
Just ignore those types, they look bad.

Report
David Reuteler
Archived post

11 September 2004, 05:57 UTC #2

Little Meow said:

"Fabrizio Mazzoleni" <[email hidden]> wrote in
news:x3r0d.366001$M95.353218@pd7tw1no:
Quoted message said:

"Little Meow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
. Then I see
them on black MTBs, wearing non-garish tee
and shorts, and sans foam topping.

Once a FRED always a FRED.

Hmmm... I should call my ragtag army
of riders Critical Fred.
Quoted message said:
Just ignore those types, they look bad.

You will some day be surrounded by the
menacing purr of knobby tires.
i've been waiting patiently for this moment.
(grabs popcorn & beer)
troll vs. troll.
--
david reuteler
[email hidden]

Report
Zoot Katz
Archived post

11 September 2004, 06:19 UTC #3

11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
<[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
Quoted message said:
troll vs. troll.
pro vs. pet
--
zk

Report
Richard Tack
Archived post

11 September 2004, 08:35 UTC #4

Zoot Katz said:
11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
<[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
Quoted message said:
troll vs. troll.
pro vs. pet
dork vs. idiot

Report
Muttley
Archived post

11 September 2004, 13:10 UTC #5

Little Meow said:
Richard Tack said:
Zoot Katz said:
11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
<[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>troll vs. troll.
pro vs. pet
dork vs. idiot
elitist vs egalitarian
sophisticate v sophist

Report
Tom Keats
Archived post

11 September 2004, 15:21 UTC #6

In article <x3r0d.366001$M95.353218@pd7tw1no>,
Fabrizio Mazzoleni said:
Once a FRED always a FRED.
Just ignore those types, they look bad.
Meow.
cheers,
Tom
--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

Report
Muttley
Archived post

11 September 2004, 16:17 UTC #7

Little Meow said:
Muttley said:
Little Meow said:
Richard Tack wrote:
> Zoot Katz wrote:
>
>> 11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
>> <[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>troll vs. troll.
>>
>>
>> pro vs. pet
>
> dork vs. idiot
elitist vs egalitarian
sophisticate v sophist

provincial vs providential
antagonistic v aquiescent

Report
Muttley
Archived post

11 September 2004, 16:17 UTC #8

Little Meow said:
Muttley said:
Little Meow said:
Richard Tack wrote:
> Zoot Katz wrote:
>
>> 11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
>> <[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>troll vs. troll.
>>
>>
>> pro vs. pet
>
> dork vs. idiot
elitist vs egalitarian
sophisticate v sophist

provincial vs providential
antagonistic v aquiescent

Report
Muttley
Archived post

11 September 2004, 16:54 UTC #9

Little Meow said:
Muttley said:
Little Meow said:
Muttley wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 12:44:54 GMT, Little Meow <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Richard Tack wrote:
>>
>>> Zoot Katz wrote:
>>>
>>>> 11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
>>>> <[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
>>>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>troll vs. troll.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> pro vs. pet
>>>
>>> dork vs. idiot
>>
>>elitist vs egalitarian
>
> sophisticate v sophist
>
provincial vs providential
antagonistic v aquiescent

adorned vs austere
inquisitive v ignorant

Report
Muttley
Archived post

11 September 2004, 19:52 UTC #10

Little Meow said:
Muttley said:
Little Meow said:
Muttley wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:06:29 GMT, Little Meow <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Muttley wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 12:44:54 GMT, Little Meow <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Richard Tack wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Zoot Katz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
>>>>>> <[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
>>>>>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>troll vs. troll.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pro vs. pet
>>>>>
>>>>> dork vs. idiot
>>>>
>>>>elitist vs egalitarian
>>>
>>> sophisticate v sophist
>>>
>>provincial vs providential
>
> antagonistic v aquiescent
>
adorned vs austere
inquisitive v ignorant
reprobate vs reputable
impervious v impregnated

Report
Richard Tack
Archived post

11 September 2004, 20:00 UTC #11

Little Meow said:
Muttley said:
Little Meow said:
Muttley wrote:
>On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 12:44:54 GMT, Little Meow <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>>Richard Tack wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Zoot Katz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
>>>><[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
>>>><[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>troll vs. troll.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>pro vs. pet
>>>
>>>dork vs. idiot
>>
>>elitist vs egalitarian
>
>sophisticate v sophist
>
provincial vs providential
antagonistic v aquiescent
adorned vs austere
cat vs. dog

Report
Zoot Katz
Archived post

11 September 2004, 20:09 UTC #12

Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:52:53 GMT,
<[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Muttley)
Quoted message said:
Little Meow said:
Muttley said:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:33:44 GMT, Little Meow <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Muttley wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:06:29 GMT, Little Meow <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>>Muttley wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 12:44:54 GMT, Little Meow <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Richard Tack wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Zoot Katz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 11 Sep 2004 05:57:58 GMT,
>>>>>>> <[email hidden]>, David Reuteler
>>>>>>> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>troll vs. troll.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> pro vs. pet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dork vs. idiot
>>>>>
>>>>>elitist vs egalitarian
>>>>
>>>> sophisticate v sophist
>>>>
>>>provincial vs providential
>>
>> antagonistic v aquiescent
>>
>adorned vs austere
inquisitive v ignorant
reprobate vs reputable
impervious v impregnated

you vs. ewe
--
zk

Report
Raoul Duke
Archived post

11 September 2004, 22:08 UTC #13

"Zoot Katz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
you vs. ewe
Spy vs. Spy
At least they were funny.
Dave

Report
Fabrizio Mazzoleni
Archived post

12 September 2004, 02:16 UTC #14

"Zoot Katz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:

Zoot, what is everybody talking about?
Dork, idiot, and pro were the only words
I knew the meaning of.
What the heck is sophist or aquiescent?

Report
Tom Keats
Archived post

12 September 2004, 02:27 UTC #15

In article <VjO0d.396339$gE.224679@pd7tw3no>,
Fabrizio Mazzoleni said:
What the heck is sophist or aquiescent?
Freds who think too much, and nobodies who think too little.
Maybe most normal people are sophescent.
cheers,
Tom
--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
Above address is just a spam midden.
I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

Report
Zoot Katz
Archived post

12 September 2004, 02:31 UTC #16

Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:08:59 -0700, <[email hidden]>,
Raoul Duke said:
Quoted message said:
you vs. ewe
Spy vs. Spy
At least they were funny.
Not after it's translated into text, knothead.
--
zk

Report
Zoot Katz
Archived post

12 September 2004, 02:50 UTC #17

Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:16:21 GMT, <VjO0d.396339$gE.224679@pd7tw3no>,
Prince "Fabrizio Mazzoleni" <[email hidden]> accorded:
Quoted message said:
Zoot, what is everybody talking about?
Dork, idiot, and pro were the only words
I knew the meaning of.
What the heck is sophist or aquiescent?
Relax, it's almost the off season.
--
zk

Report
dreaded
Archived post

13 September 2004, 01:18 UTC #18

"Zoot Katz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Sun, 12 Sep 2004 02:16:21 GMT, <VjO0d.396339$gE.224679@pd7tw3no>,
Prince "Fabrizio Mazzoleni" <[email hidden]> accorded:
Quoted message said:
Zoot, what is everybody talking about?
Dork, idiot, and pro were the only words
I knew the meaning of.
What the heck is sophist or aquiescent?
Relax, it's almost the off season.
--
zk
what the heck is a fred? what the hell is "offseason?"
-a

Report
Fabrizio Mazzoleni
Archived post

13 September 2004, 01:25 UTC #19

"dreaded" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
what the heck is a fred? what the hell is "offseason?"
-a
Let's start with 'newbie', that's you.
But don't worry about it.

Report
dreaded
Archived post

13 September 2004, 01:26 UTC #20

"Tom Keats" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <x3r0d.366001$M95.353218@pd7tw1no>,
Fabrizio Mazzoleni said:
Once a FRED always a FRED.
Just ignore those types, they look bad.
Meow.
cheers,
Tom
--
-- Nothing is safe from me.
"mrgknao!"
-leopold bloom's cat

Report

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.

Jump through the discussion

What we know about this thread

Continue through CyclingForums

Active in this thread