General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Facts About Mercury & Dental Amalgams

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 2 posts · 443 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 June 2004
Last activity
13 June 2004
Original author
Jan
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
443
Views / 30 days
5

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I. Introduction

    II. Toxicity and Health Effects of Mercury

    III. Systemic Mercury Intake Levels from Amalgam Filling Exposure

    IV. Immune System Effects and Autoimmune Disease

    V. Medical Studies Finding Health Problems Related to Amalgam Fillings

    VI. Documented Results of Removal of Amalgam Fillings

    VII. Tests for Mercury Level and Toxicity and Treatments

    VIII. Health Effects from Dental Staff Exposure to Mercury

    IX. Scientific Panel and Government Bodies That Have Found Amalgam
    Fillings Unsafe

    I. Introduction

    Toxic metals such as mercury, lead, cadmium, etc. have been documented to be
    neurotoxic, immunotoxic, reproductive/developmental toxins that, according
    to U.S. Government agencies, cause adverse health effects and learning
    disabilities to millions in the U.S. each year, especially children and the
    elderly (105,160). Exposure of humans and animals to toxic metals such as
    mercury, cadmium, lead, copper, aluminum, arsenic, chromium, manganese, etc.
    is widespread and in many areas increasing. The U.S. Center for Disease
    Control (276) ranks toxic metals as the number one environmental health
    threat to children. According to an EPA/ATSDR assessment, the toxic metals
    mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium are all ranked in the top 7 toxins
    having the most adverse health effects on the public based on toxicity and
    current exposure levels in the U.S., with nickel and chromium also highly
    listed. While there are large numbers of neurological and immune conditions
    among adults, the incidence of neurotoxic or immune reactive conditions in
    infants such as autism, schizophrenia, ADD, dyslexia, learning disabilities,
    etc. have been increasing especially rapidly in recent years (2, 276, 409,
    441). A recent report by the National Research Council found that 50% of
    all pregnancies in the U.S. are now resulting in prenatal or postnatal
    mortality, significant birth defects, or otherwise chronically unhealthy
    babies (441). Exposure to toxic chemicals or environmental factors appears
    to be a factor in as much as 28 percent of the 4 million children born each
    year (441), with 1 in 6 having one of the neurological conditions previously
    listed. EPA estimates that over 3 million of these are related to lead or
    mercury toxicity (2, 276, 409).

    While there is considerable commonality to the health effects commonly
    caused by these toxic metals, and effects are cumulative and synergistic in
    many cases, this paper will concentrate on the health effects of elemental
    mercury from amalgam fillings. Studies have found considerable genetic
    variability in susceptibility to toxic metals as well. The public appears
    to be generally unaware that considerable scientific evidence supports that
    mercury is the metal causing the most widespread adverse health effects to
    the public, and amalgam fillings have been well documented to be the number
    one source of exposure of mercury to most people, with exposure levels often
    exceeding Government health guidelines and levels documented to cause
    adverse health effects.

    Entire article at: http://tinyurl.com/2jvx7

  2. On 13 Jun 2004 00:46:34 GMT, [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:
    On June 17, 1999 Jan Drew said that she was bed ridden and dying of
    mercury poisoning.

    On June 18-19, 1999 Jan Drew had EIGHT amalgams removed which caused a
    massive outpouring of mercury vapor absorbing into the lungs and
    rapidly entering the bloodstream.

    On June 19th, 1999 hours after having the amalgams out Jan Drew said
    that she felt better than she had in two years.

    On June 26, 1999 a week later when the mercury from the bloodstream
    would maximally enter her tissues Jan Drew said that all her foot pain
    went away and that she was able to go line dancing. She also said that
    the removal of eight amalgams made a difference.

    When Jan Drew is confronted with the above she is unable to reconcile
    how her health could have improved a week after eight amalgams were
    removed when her mercury level was likely the highest in her life. Jan
    Drew can also not explain how she could go from being bed ridden and
    almost dying of mercury poisoning to a week later being able to line
    dance and having all the foot pain go away. Of course her foot pain
    soon returned since placebo responses are short lived.

    Jan is unable to explain any of this because she knows her whole
    mercury poisoning story is bogus. And the evidence that she knows that
    it is bogus is her LYING about not regaining her health until AFTER
    her mercury level dropped. Jan said that because she thought it would
    make others believe her story. Jan is a liar and a psychopath. She
    never had mercury poisoning and I believe Jan Drew realizes this.

    Aloha,

    Rich
    -------------------------------------------------
    -------------------------------------------------

    The best defense to logic is ignorance

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.