Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Re: Exploding tires II

Started by Frank Krygowski · · Last activity · 168 posts · 4,898 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
24 August 2004
Last activity
2 September 2004
Original author
Frank Krygowski
Posts
168
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,898
Views / 30 days
3

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 168
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Mike Jacoubowsky said:

    For those of us who have forgotten our high-school physics, could


    you give a

    Quoted message said:

    few examples of absolute vs Celsius (or Fahrenheit) temperatures? In the
    real world, we might conceivably see a tire/tube start the day at 40 degrees
    (F) and reach a peak of well over 100 (F), possibly 150? To tell you the
    truth, I don't honestly know just how hot the air in a tube might get on a
    very long, very steep descent with ambient air temp at 90 degrees. However,
    that's a real-world example that some of us experience.

    OK, the relationship is (P1*V1)/T1 = (P2*V2)/T2 where P and T refer to
    absolute pressures and temperatures, V is volume. If volume is
    (reasonably) assumed constant, it cancels out, and you can rearrange to:

    P2 = P1 *(T2/T1)

    But again, P & T have to be measured on absolute scales. They're
    usually not, so you have to convert.

    For metric measurements like the originally quoted Celsius, the absolute
    temperature scale is Kelvin. To convert Celsius to Kelvin, add 273.15

    If you're starting with degrees Fahrenheit, the corresponding absolute
    scale is Rankine. To convert Fahrenheit to Rankine, add 459.67 (or
    alternately, convert Fahrenheit to Celsius and use the Kelvin scale.)

    For pressures, your gage measures "gage pressure," psig. To convert to
    absolute pressure (psia) add the pressure of the atmosphere, 14.7 psia.

    So, 40 deg. F = 499.67 deg R 150 deg F = 609.67 deg R
    90 psig = 104.7 psia

    and P2 = 104.7 psia*(609.67/499.67) = 127.7 psia

    But now we have to get that absolute pressure converted back to gage
    pressure. Subtract 14.7 and you get P2 = 113 psig.

    So in general, it's not as bad as you might think.

    There are commercially available stick-on temperature indicators that
    record maximum temperatures of the surface to which they're stuck.
    http://www.tempil.com/Tempilabel.htm

    ISTR someone checking tandem rims on mountain descents with these
    things, but I don't recall what the maximum temperature was.

    --
    Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com.
    Substitute cc dot ysu dot
    edu]

  2. Frank Krygowski said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:

    For those of us who have forgotten our high-school physics, could


    you give a

    Quoted message said:

    few examples of absolute vs Celsius (or Fahrenheit) temperatures? In
    the real world, we might conceivably see a tire/tube start the day at
    40 degrees (F) and reach a peak of well over 100 (F), possibly 150? To
    tell you the truth, I don't honestly know just how hot the air in a
    tube might get on a very long, very steep descent with ambient air temp
    at 90 degrees. However, that's a real-world example that some of us
    experience.

    OK, the relationship is (P1*V1)/T1 = (P2*V2)/T2 where P and T refer to
    absolute pressures and temperatures, V is volume. If volume is
    (reasonably) assumed constant, it cancels out, and you can rearrange to:

    P2 = P1 *(T2/T1)

    But again, P & T have to be measured on absolute scales. They're
    usually not, so you have to convert.

    For metric measurements like the originally quoted Celsius, the absolute
    temperature scale is Kelvin. To convert Celsius to Kelvin, add 273.15

    If you're starting with degrees Fahrenheit, the corresponding absolute
    scale is Rankine. To convert Fahrenheit to Rankine, add 459.67 (or
    alternately, convert Fahrenheit to Celsius and use the Kelvin scale.)

    For pressures, your gage measures "gage pressure," psig. To convert to
    absolute pressure (psia) add the pressure of the atmosphere, 14.7 psia.

    So, 40 deg. F = 499.67 deg R 150 deg F = 609.67 deg R
    90 psig = 104.7 psia

    and P2 = 104.7 psia*(609.67/499.67) = 127.7 psia

    But now we have to get that absolute pressure converted back to gage
    pressure. Subtract 14.7 and you get P2 = 113 psig.

    So in general, it's not as bad as you might think.

    There are commercially available stick-on temperature indicators that
    record maximum temperatures of the surface to which they're stuck.
    http://www.tempil.com/Tempilabel.htm

    ISTR someone checking tandem rims on mountain descents with these
    things, but I don't recall what the maximum temperature was.


    Long response, wow.
    I think the main thing is that the tire/tube combination is much
    more sensitive to temperature than the change in air pressure.
    Rubber like materials don't fare well over about 150 F.
    Hot pavement with braking on a long descent can cause material
    troubles.
    Bill Baka

    --
    Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

  3. Frank Krygowski said:

    For metric measurements like the originally quoted Celsius, the
    absolute temperature scale is Kelvin. To convert Celsius to Kelvin,
    add 273.15

    Quoted message said:

    If you're starting with degrees Fahrenheit, the corresponding
    absolute scale is Rankine. To convert Fahrenheit to Rankine, add
    459.67 (or alternately, convert Fahrenheit to Celsius and use the
    Kelvin scale.)

    Quoted message said:

    For pressures, your gage measures "gage pressure," psig. To convert
    to absolute pressure (psia) add the pressure of the atmosphere, 14.7
    psia.

    Quoted message said:

    So, 40 deg. F = 499.67 deg R 150 deg F = 609.67 deg R
    90 psig = 104.7 psia

    Quoted message said:

    and P2 = 104.7 psia*(609.67/499.67) = 127.7 psia

    Quoted message said:

    But now we have to get that absolute pressure converted back to gage
    pressure. Subtract 14.7 and you get P2 = 113 psig.

    Quoted message said:

    So in general, it's not as bad as you might think.

    Actually things are worse than you think because rims get much hotter
    than suspected. My first introduction to how high rims get was with
    steam generated from water in the rim on a mild descent with hairpin
    turns at the end of several straight runs. The experience also showed
    that on exiting the turn, steam stopped escaping which revealed how
    fast air cooling reduces rim temperatures.

    That rim heating is significant has been experienced by tandem riders
    who ride in mountains as well as singles on steep roads such as those
    in Austria, typically Zirlerberg with winding 18% grade and where
    bicycling are absolutely prohibited downhill, and for good reason.
    Even for cares and trucks, several steep run-away tracks exit from
    curves in the event of brake failure.

    http://tinyurl.com/jhiu

    Quoted message said:

    There are commercially available stick-on temperature indicators that
    record maximum temperatures of the surface to which they're stuck.
    http://www.tempil.com/Tempilabel.htm

    Forget about that, it's both temperature and duration that cause
    dangerous heating and overpressure blow-offs. I've done it as have
    others with whom I have ridden on steep roads. Unobservant riders
    might attribute the blow-off to a faulty tire or poor tire mounting but
    it is heat.

    Quoted message said:

    ISTR someone checking tandem rims on mountain descents with these
    things, but I don't recall what the maximum temperature was.

    After you have ridden a few hundred miles in mountainous terrain and
    then have a blow-off should be definitive.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  4. On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:04:11 GMT,
    [email hidden] wrote:

    [snip frank]

    [snip jobst]

    Quoted message said:

    My first introduction to how high rims get was with
    steam generated from water in the rim on a mild descent with hairpin
    turns at the end of several straight runs. The experience also showed
    that on exiting the turn, steam stopped escaping which revealed how
    fast air cooling reduces rim temperatures.

    [snip jobst]

    Quoted message said:

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

    Dear Jobst,

    Is this rapid heat loss after you exit the turn and stop
    braking mostly air cooling, radiating, or convection into
    the tires, tube, and compressed air?

    I think that you've mentioned a tire bursting when you were
    just dawdling down a steep hill, barely riding the brake at
    around 10 mph while waiting for a friend who'd stopped to
    take a picture, so this would seem to support air cooling.

    But I'm wondering how much heat just radiates off the huge
    exposed surface area of the rim in still air and how much
    heat is absorbed by the tire-tube-compressed-air covering
    the unexposed surface.

    Are the other two heat losses negligible?

    Carl Fogel

  5. Quoted message said:
    Frank Krygowski said:

    There are commercially available stick-on temperature indicators that
    record maximum temperatures of the surface to which they're stuck.
    http://www.tempil.com/Tempilabel.htm

    Forget about that, it's both temperature and duration that cause
    dangerous heating and overpressure blow-offs. I've done it as have
    others with whom I have ridden on steep roads. Unobservant riders
    might attribute the blow-off to a faulty tire or poor tire mounting but
    it is heat.

    As a guy who likes data, I'd still be interested in a "maximum
    temperature" reading. If someone wanted to log temperature versus time
    instead, that would be even more interesting, but much more difficult.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ISTR someone checking tandem rims on mountain descents with these
    things, but I don't recall what the maximum temperature was.

    After you have ridden a few hundred miles in mountainous terrain and
    then have a blow-off should be definitive.

    I've done the first, but not the second. I'd hope to find a less scary
    way of learning about this!

    --
    Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com.
    Substitute cc dot ysu dot
    edu]

  6. Quoted message said:

    Actually things are worse than you think because rims get much hotter
    than suspected. My first introduction to how high rims get was with
    steam generated from water in the rim on a mild descent with hairpin
    turns at the end of several straight runs. The experience also showed
    that on exiting the turn, steam stopped escaping which revealed how
    fast air cooling reduces rim temperatures.

    So perhaps for a cheap thrill or two, a cyclist could put a small amount of
    colored water (to make the steam easier to observe) into their rim prior to
    a descent?

    Are you suspecting that the air temp in the tube actually exceeds 100C? In
    the 0-100C example, the pressure differential didn't appear to be enough to
    blow a (properly mounted) tire off of a rim (from 100psi to 136psi).

    I have seen a far greater number of tubes exhibiting snake-bite-type damage
    (as you'd see on a compression cut) on "blowouts" on steep descents, making
    me wonder if the material properties of the rubber itself change (for the
    worse) as temperatures rise.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    IMBA, BikesBelong, NBDA member

  7. Frank Krygowski said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    There are commercially available stick-on temperature indicators that
    record maximum temperatures of the surface to which they're stuck.
    http://www.tempil.com/Tempilabel.htm

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Forget about that, it's both temperature and duration that cause
    dangerous heating and overpressure blow-offs. I've done it as have
    others with whom I have ridden on steep roads. Unobservant riders
    might attribute the blow-off to a faulty tire or poor tire mounting
    but it is heat.

    Quoted message said:

    As a guy who likes data, I'd still be interested in a "maximum
    temperature" reading. If someone wanted to log temperature versus
    time instead, that would be even more interesting, but much more
    difficult.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ISTR someone checking tandem rims on mountain descents with these
    things, but I don't recall what the maximum temperature was.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    After you have ridden a few hundred miles in mountainous terrain
    and then have a blow-off should be definitive.

    Quoted message said:

    I've done the first, but not the second. I'd hope to find a less
    scary way of learning about this!

    OK, nothing lost if you put a few heat indicators on your rear rim,
    find a steep road (steeper than 12%) in your area and with a tire
    inflated over 100psi, roll down the hill at between 5 and 8 mph with
    only the rear brake applied. When the tire blows off, use the front
    brake to stop and check the highest temperature reached. This will
    cost you no more than one tube, preferably one that had a few patches.
    There is no hazard here if you don't have any tight turns.

    This is an easy test that I have done inadvertently without
    instrumentation. I'm satisfied that it occurs easily. I have had an
    opportunity to testify on a tandem case where the rider concocted a
    story that was immediately apparent to me, because the scenario was
    based on the belief that brake heating did not cause the tire to bow
    off. I could prove by the evidence on the bicycle that his story was
    false and also how the failure actually occurred.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  8. Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    Actually things are worse than you think because rims get much
    hotter than suspected. My first introduction to how high rims get
    was with steam generated from water in the rim on a mild descent
    with hairpin turns at the end of several straight runs. The
    experience also showed that on exiting the turn, steam stopped
    escaping which revealed how fast air cooling reduces rim
    temperatures.

    Quoted message said:

    So perhaps for a cheap thrill or two, a cyclist could put a small
    amount of colored water (to make the steam easier to observe) into
    their rim prior to a descent?

    What would colored water do?

    Quoted message said:

    Are you suspecting that the air temp in the tube actually exceeds
    100C? In the 0-100C example, the pressure differential didn't
    appear to be enough to blow a (properly mounted) tire off of a rim
    (from 100psi to 136psi).

    That depends on how long the tube is exposed to how high a
    temperature. What is proven is that you can blow a tire off the rim
    with brake heating.

    Quoted message said:

    I have seen a far greater number of tubes exhibiting snake-bite-type
    damage (as you'd see on a compression cut) on "blowouts" on steep
    descents, making me wonder if the material properties of the rubber
    itself change (for the worse) as temperatures rise.

    It makes no difference, the tire blows off the rim. That is why you
    hear a loud bang that produces a long slash in the tube.

    http://draco.acs.uci.edu/rbfaq/FAQ/8b.4.html

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  9. Carl Fogel said:
    Quoted message said:

    My first introduction to how high rims get was with steam generated
    from water in the rim on a mild descent with hairpin turns at the
    end of several straight runs. The experience also showed that on
    exiting the turn, steam stopped escaping which revealed how fast
    air cooling reduces rim temperatures.

    Quoted message said:

    Is this rapid heat loss after you exit the turn and stop braking
    mostly air cooling, radiating, or convection into the tires, tube,
    and compressed air?

    In this case it probably went into making steam but air cooling is a
    major sink judging from the absence of blow-offs when I descent the
    same road fast.

    Quoted message said:

    I think that you've mentioned a tire bursting when you were just
    dawdling down a steep hill, barely riding the brake at around 10 mph
    while waiting for a friend who'd stopped to take a picture, so this
    would seem to support air cooling.

    This was on a 12%+ grade on which I was waiting for my friend who was
    taking pictures. For convenience I used only the rear brake so I
    could easily look over my shoulder. I have ridden this route often
    with no problem, before that and since with the same normal inflation
    pressure. It is also not the first descent encountered on my European
    bicycle tour.

    Quoted message said:

    But I'm wondering how much heat just radiates off the huge exposed
    surface area of the rim in still air and how much heat is absorbed
    by the tire-tube-compressed-air covering the unexposed surface.

    Enough to blow the tire off.

    Quoted message said:

    Are the other two heat losses negligible?

    I don't know or care.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  10. Quoted message said:

    OK, nothing lost if you put a few heat indicators on your rear rim,
    find a steep road (steeper than 12%) in your area and with a tire
    inflated over 100psi, roll down the hill at between 5 and 8 mph with
    only the rear brake applied. When the tire blows off, use the front
    brake to stop and check the highest temperature reached. This will
    cost you no more than one tube, preferably one that had a few patches.
    There is no hazard here if you don't have any tight turns.

    No hazard of crashing maybe, but when it happened to me I had a big welt
    on the side of my calf from the explosion. I suggest wearing protective
    clothing if anyone tries this.

  11. On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:57:21 GMT, "Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction

    Bicycles said:

    I have seen a far greater number of tubes exhibiting snake-bite-type damage
    (as you'd see on a compression cut) on "blowouts" on steep descents, making
    me wonder if the material properties of the rubber itself change (for the
    worse) as temperatures rise.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    IMBA, BikesBelong, NBDA member

    I wonder if the tube gets the snakebite cut after the blowout, before
    the rider comes to a stop?

  12. dianne_1234567890? said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have seen a far greater number of tubes exhibiting
    snake-bite-type damage (as you'd see on a compression cut) on
    "blowouts" on steep descents, making me wonder if the material
    properties of the rubber itself change (for the worse) as
    temperatures rise.

    Quoted message said:

    I wonder if the tube gets the snakebite cut after the blowout,
    before the rider comes to a stop?

    That's a red herring! If the tire got a flat first, then what made it
    blow off the rim and go BANG! This makes no sense.

    On the other hand, I wasn't aware that there was any doubt that rim
    heating cause blow-offs, especially among bicycle shop operators.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  13. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Mike Jacoubowsky writes:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So perhaps for a cheap thrill or two, a cyclist could put a small
    amount of colored water (to make the steam easier to observe) into
    their rim prior to a descent?

    What would colored water do?

    Make coloured steam.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  14. Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction Bicycles said:


    Are you suspecting that the air temp in the tube actually exceeds 100C? In
    the 0-100C example, the pressure differential didn't appear to be enough to
    blow a (properly mounted) tire off of a rim (from 100psi to 136psi).

    I have seen a far greater number of tubes exhibiting snake-bite-type damage
    (as you'd see on a compression cut) on "blowouts" on steep descents, making
    me wonder if the material properties of the rubber itself change (for the
    worse) as temperatures rise.

    Checking the Matweb site,
    http://www.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=P0RUB1
    for properties of vulcanized natural rubber, there are two things that
    strike me as interesting.

    One is "Maximum service temperature, Air = 176 deg. F." They don't
    specify the consequences of exceeding this, and I don't know if they're
    related to long term degredation or short term failure, but it's
    interesting.

    The other is the coefficient of thermal expansion, 125 microinches per
    inch per degree F. That's pretty high, of course, about ten times as
    much as aluminum and 20 times steel.

    I wonder about the change in the interface between the tire and the rim
    when the dimensions change with temperature. The steel bead wire
    (assuming that's what you've got) would change the least, by virtue of
    lowest coefficient and being most insulated. The rim would grow a bit
    (tightening the fit, I suppose), but the rubber would be trying to grow
    significantly. Is there a chance this (combined with, say, softening at
    higher temps) would cause distorion of the bead shape, and cause the
    bead to lose its grip on the rim?

    --
    --------------------+
    Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove rodent and vegetable dot com,
    replace with cc.ysu dot edu]

  15. DRS said:

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Mike Jacoubowsky writes:

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So perhaps for a cheap thrill or two, a cyclist could put a small
    amount of colored water (to make the steam easier to observe) into
    their rim prior to a descent?

    What would colored water do?

    Make coloured steam.

    Too bad it isnt that easy.

  16. Quoted message said:

    ...
    That rim heating is significant has been experienced by tandem riders
    who ride in mountains as well as singles on steep roads such as those
    in Austria, typically Zirlerberg with winding 18% grade and where
    bicycling are absolutely prohibited downhill, and for good reason.
    Even for cares and trucks, several steep run-away tracks exit from
    curves in the event of brake failure.

    http://tinyurl.com/jhiu

    Is this actually a bad Polish joke?

    --
    Tom Sherman

  17. Wow...

    Did I open a can 'o worms or what??

    My thanks to Frank K, author of the first reply...yes, I did the math and
    the pressure due to increased temp (25 C) did indeed raise the psi in the
    tyres to @ 100-105 psi

    For those who asked, yes -15 C is indeed below freezing - around 0 F.

    -and +25 = @ 80 F, give or take a degree or two.

    These were dept store roadies of early 80's vintage: steel wheels,cheap
    tubes, cheap tyres; and although the tyres were rated for 90 psi, I suspect
    they couldn't safely hold much more pressure than that...

    ....and did I say "explode"? It was actually just yer run-of-the-mill pinch
    blowout...

    Thanks again for the lively discussion...

  18. Frank Krygowski said:
    Quoted message said:

    Are you suspecting that the air temp in the tube actually exceeds
    100C? In the 0-100C example, the pressure differential didn't
    appear to be enough to blow a (properly mounted) tire off of a rim
    (from 100psi to 136psi).

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have seen a far greater number of tubes exhibiting
    snake-bite-type damage (as you'd see on a compression cut) on
    "blowouts" on steep descents, making me wonder if the material
    properties of the rubber itself change (for the worse) as
    temperatures rise.

    Quoted message said:

    Checking the Matweb site,
    http://www.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=P0RUB1
    for properties of vulcanized natural rubber, there are two things that
    strike me as interesting.

    Quoted message said:

    One is "Maximum service temperature, Air = 176 deg. F." They don't
    specify the consequences of exceeding this, and I don't know if
    they're related to long term degradation or short term failure, but
    it's interesting.

    This is service temperature, not peak survival temperature, which is
    far higher. There is also the problem of tube adhesion to the tire
    casing, which is also enhanced by higher temperature. I just got a
    snake bite flat that went down over about 30 seconds, mainly because
    the tube was securely adhering to the tire. After the tube was out of
    the tire it leaked like a sieve.

    Quoted message said:

    The other is the coefficient of thermal expansion, 125 microinches
    per inch per degree F. That's pretty high, of course, about ten
    times as much as aluminum and 20 times steel.

    So with 200 F the tube would increase in length by about 5/8 of an
    inch if it were free to do so... but it's not so who cares.

    Quoted message said:

    I wonder about the change in the interface between the tire and the
    rim when the dimensions change with temperature. The steel bead
    wire (assuming that's what you've got) would change the least, by
    virtue of lowest coefficient and being most insulated. The rim
    would grow a bit (tightening the fit, I suppose), but the rubber
    would be trying to grow significantly. Is there a chance this
    (combined with, say, softening at higher temps) would cause
    distortion of the bead shape, and cause the bead to lose its grip on
    the rim?

    It's the clinch, not the wire. Wire bead tires blow off the rim
    equally well with Kevlar ones. Believe me, I've tried it and observed
    it. Stop raising new specters behind every turn. Brake heating
    causes blow-offs. Accept it!

    What is this all about anyway. What are you trying to generate?

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  19. Tom Sherman said:
    Quoted message said:

    ... That rim heating is significant has been experienced by tandem
    riders who ride in mountains as well as singles on steep roads such
    as those in Austria, typically Zirlerberg with winding 18% grade
    and where bicycling are absolutely prohibited downhill, and for
    good reason. Even for cares and trucks, several steep run-away
    tracks exit from curves in the event of brake failure.

    http://tinyurl.com/jhiu

    Quoted message said:

    Is this actually a bad Polish joke?

    What do you find odd about this. There are runaway tracks on US
    railroads and highways. The Grapevine in California was equipped
    with these before it became Interstate-5 and in this web site, take a
    look at runaway lanes in America:

    http://modena.intergate.ca/personal/pl8s/BC5/Hwy_5N_C.htm

    Railroads use them as well. In San Francisco, the Geary-B car had one
    before the Cliff house before that line was abandoned. RR switches
    can generally not be set for straight through traffic until a train
    stops to prove its ability to stop.

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

  20. Quoted message said:

    Frank Krygowski writes:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    What is this all about anyway. What are you trying to generate?

    Jobst Brandt
    [email hidden]

    Dear Jobst,

    Frank is displaying a trait called curiosity. It worries
    some people.

    Carl Fogel

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.