Jim Flom said:"MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote...
Quoted message said:Yeah, you got the coroner's full report and toxicology results on that
right? Or are you just repeating rumors you heard and claiming they are
the same as an actual toxicology report? (Hint: no coronor tests for EPO).
For all I know they could have died from a myriad of other substances. You
want it to be EPO so you say it is EPO. That doesn't make it so.
If you want to invent your own cause of death, then go right ahead. But
don't come in here and try to sell me on the [censored] you know it's due to
EPO when the fact is you don't.
And O.J. is innocent.
Although there is no evidence directly linking the recent spate of
fatalities to banned drug use, a similar cluster of deaths - mainly in the
Low Countries - in the late 1980s and early 1990s is now held to have marked
the arrival in cycling of the banned blood booster erythropoietin (EPO).
http://sport.guardian.co.uk/cycling/story/0,10482,1149111,00.html
Yeah, and all those boats that "disappear" off the coast of Florida are
due to the Bermuda Triangle. After all, what else could it be?
How do you know they didn't die of amphetamines or cocaine or mismatched
blood transfusions or Pot belge or insulin overdose or any number of
other things? Why would you just pick EPO out of the blue like that?
It's bizarre.
Quoted message said:
Additional dangers of EPO include sudden death during sleep, which has
killed approximately 18 pro cyclists in the past fifteen years, and the
development of antibodies directed against EPO. In this later circumstance
the individual develops anemia as a result of the body's reaction against
repeated EPO injections.
http://www.rice.edu/~jenky/sports/epo.html
A declaration without proof, names, or coroner's reports. It's all
guessing, just like you and everyone else does.
Just because you cite a link doesn't mean the content in it has been proven.
I like all the references and official documentation to support this
contention in the article (none). Do you think just because the link
has "edu" in it I'm suppose to roll over and capitulate to its content?
OJ had DNA evidence. What does your EPO contention have besides
guessing? You don't kknow any of their blood values or whether they
were anemic or not (tell me their blood's hemoglobin levels and how you
know that figure to be true).
All your evidence is self-fulfilling rhetoric.
Thanks,
Magilla