Re: Ed Dolan is ... G R E A T !!!

Ed,

Here are some examples of your recent more outlandish babble and my
response...

You are obviously my inferior as everyone can so plainly see.

.... Opinion stated as fact ... and erroneous at that. Keep repeating
it Ed and perhaps even you too will one day believe it to be true.

Everyone on these newsgroups LOVES me. That is obvious from all the
responses I get to my every utterance.

.... Opinion stated as fact ... and erroneous at that. For some
peculiar reason, you confuse responses the negative with love. From
what I've read, most here loathe you.

Note how no one ever responds to anything you have to say.

.... Yep, so what's your point??? See my next comment in this regard

That is because you are a world class bore and have the peculiar knack
of never saying anything that anyone would be interested in reading.

.... Or is it because readers don't find what I say objectionable or
take issue with what I say, particularly with regard to your sorry ass.
It is logical to assume that the readers are simply in agreement with
my assessment of ARBR's quintessential parasitic TROLL. You are
responded to simply because readers take issue with your provocative
[censored]. Are you deaf ... dumb ... blind ... or "D" ... ALL of the above
the above.

I know that what pleases me will please millions of other folks.

.... This assertion is so ludicrous as to require no comment.

Readers (I know how Ed likes it when I do that ;^) ...

Unfortunately, Ed Dolan is in this world, but fortunately Ed has
determined not to be part of it ... a hermit who resides in the
confining corner of cyberspace where from behind a keyboard he snipes
at those who dare venture into what he considers his exclusive domain
.... ARBR. In a twisted crusade to garner recognition, the myopic
"visionary" engages his "inferiors" in a quest to bolster his fragile
ego and faltering insecurities. His repertoire of expression is, like
him mind, traditionally narrow, focused but askew and his rhetoric is
voluminous, but boringly repetitious. Ed is a fool who demands to be
heard. He has deluded himself into believing that the readership
actually cares about the [censored] this obnoxious [censored] has to say. Pity
the man, for he is beyond SICK!!!

Jim McNamara

I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!

Bill,

As if Ed's head isn't big enough you dare to compare him to great Greek
philosophers!!! Ed is a classic stoic??? He hasn't achieved happiness
by submission to destiny. Ed defies destiny and humanity. He is a
misanthrope who believes that he has transcended to a state of
perfection that we all should emulate. You may be enamored with Ed,
but if you read what others have said of him, you will quickly realize
that yours is a minoity opinion.

Perhaps if Ed had not challenged me to take him on in ARBR, he would
not have gotten what he asked for. Possessed of an unrestrained and
enormously distended sense of self-importance, Ed Dolan is an enigma,
disenfranchised from reality. A victim of his own myopic perceptions,
he is a bizarre, pitiful soul, consumed by warped fixations and driven
by twisted misconceptions. How he manages to appropriate time to
lavish on those whom he disdains as inferiors defies comprehension and
rationality. I have a suggestion for Ed. He should muster the
intestinal fortitude to abide by his promise to take leave of ARBR.
Then he could bask in the luxury of delusional solitude.

Jim McNamara

Quoted message said:

I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Here is how JimmyMac shoud have formatted his post:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!

Quoted message said:

Bill,

As if Ed's head isn't big enough you dare to compare him to great Greek
philosophers!!! Ed is a classic stoic??? He hasn't achieved happiness
by submission to destiny. Ed defies destiny and humanity. He is a
misanthrope who believes that he has transcended to a state of
perfection that we all should emulate. You may be enamored with Ed,
but if you read what others have said of him, you will quickly realize
that yours is a minoity opinion.

Perhaps if Ed had not challenged me to take him on in ARBR, he would
not have gotten what he asked for. Possessed of an unrestrained and
enormously distended sense of self-importance, Ed Dolan is an enigma,
disenfranchised from reality. A victim of his own myopic perceptions,
he is a bizarre, pitiful soul, consumed by warped fixations and driven
by twisted misconceptions. How he manages to appropriate time to
lavish on those whom he disdains as inferiors defies comprehension and
rationality. I have a suggestion for Ed. He should muster the
intestinal fortitude to abide by his promise to take leave of ARBR.
Then he could bask in the luxury of delusional solitude.

Jim McNamara

Quoted message said:

I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!

JimmyMac is a light weight. He loves to read his own words, which is why he
misuses almost all of them. But what is even more startling is how his mind
works. It is full of nothing but spite and envy. We saw this played out with
Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3 of us have responded to him -
with contempt and disdain. He mainly engenders pity.

JimmyMac refuses to post properly and never has anything to say that anyone
would want to read, not even me when he is doing nothing but blathering
about me. It is nothing but a long-winded whine. Since that is the case, I
will refuse to read him any further, but will comment on what others have to
say about him if anything.

However, I am going to do one thing which should make JimmyMac happy. I am
only going to look in on these newsgroups about once a week from now on. I
am simply wasting too much time on all the idiots, morons and imbeciles
which infest these groups - none of whom deserve my Greatness.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Ed,

Assumptions ... assumptions .... Opinions stated as fact. Nothing ever
changes where Head Swollen Ed Dolan is concerned. I'll tell you what
would make not only me happy, but everyone else too, Ed ... if you'd
take your obnoxious, sorry ass out of here, and for good this time.
Leave and don't come back like you promised you would at least half a
dozen times. You broke that promise as many times as you made it.
Well, so much for your credibility, Ed. If you feel that you are
wasting too much time on the newsgroup inhabitants and they are
unworthy of your self-proclaimed, alleged greatness, then take the
obvious appropriate action. Get the hell out of here and don't let the
door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Speaking of whiners. Quit whining about me giving you what you asked
for. You invited me to take you on in a private email. If you
don't' like the fact that I did as you asked, then you should be
angry with the person responsible ... you. You got exactly what you
asked for. As for focusing on you, Gin and Sherman, Gin is a nemesis
from way back and as I recall you focused pretty well on him yourself.
When Sherman came to the defense of Gin and crowd, of course I focused
on him. Correct me if I am wrong here, but Sherman has been a focus of
yours extending back for years. In case you haven't seen the obvious
difference here, allow me to enlighten you. You are unable to
selectively focus on anyone. You take on just about everyone primarily
because they are not like you, don't hold your values, don't agree
with you, don't give you the respect that you demand. Grow up
HEADward the GRATE!

Ed Dolan has often implied that ARBR is HIS domain a place where he
performs housekeeping chores to curtail his inferiors like a cowboy
riding heard on cattle. Recently, he extended his reign to RBM and
another newsgroup that sounds as though it were specifically created
for him ... alt.usenet.kooks. I had a look to find nothing new.
Thread after thread-worn thread, one can hear the same old broken
record playing the same old song over and over and over. Ed is in dire
need of new material. He has been regurgitating the same old [censored] now
for years now. I'm not surprised though that he feels the need to look
in only once a week. He was catching a lot of flack from numerous
posters who appreciate him about as much as I do, which is to say not
at all. The bottom line is that Ed has an over-inflated opinion of his
importance. Ed needs to get over himself. Most everyone else has.
The odd thing is that Ed Dolan should know this by now, but he is in
denial.

Jim McNamara

P.S. I'll not apologize for being articulate. It is a pity that one
who was once a librarian struggles so with what I write and in
frustration objects to that which he cannot comprehend.

Edward Dolan said:

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Here is how JimmyMac shoud have formatted his post:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!

Quoted message said:

Bill,

As if Ed's head isn't big enough you dare to compare him to great Greek
philosophers!!! Ed is a classic stoic??? He hasn't achieved happiness
by submission to destiny. Ed defies destiny and humanity. He is a
misanthrope who believes that he has transcended to a state of
perfection that we all should emulate. You may be enamored with Ed,
but if you read what others have said of him, you will quickly realize
that yours is a minoity opinion.

Perhaps if Ed had not challenged me to take him on in ARBR, he would
not have gotten what he asked for. Possessed of an unrestrained and
enormously distended sense of self-importance, Ed Dolan is an enigma,
disenfranchised from reality. A victim of his own myopic perceptions,
he is a bizarre, pitiful soul, consumed by warped fixations and driven
by twisted misconceptions. How he manages to appropriate time to
lavish on those whom he disdains as inferiors defies comprehension and
rationality. I have a suggestion for Ed. He should muster the
intestinal fortitude to abide by his promise to take leave of ARBR.
Then he could bask in the luxury of delusional solitude.

Jim McNamara

Quoted message said:

I wish you would just get off Ed's case. I really think he's great.
He's a classic stoic, in the tradition of the great Greek philosophers
Epictetus and Democritus. It is really great to see such that one can
be so virtuous in this day and age. Give 'em hell, Ed!

JimmyMac is a light weight. He loves to read his own words, which is why he
misuses almost all of them. But what is even more startling is how his mind
works. It is full of nothing but spite and envy. We saw this played out with
Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3 of us have responded to him -
with contempt and disdain. He mainly engenders pity.

JimmyMac refuses to post properly and never has anything to say that anyone
would want to read, not even me when he is doing nothing but blathering
about me. It is nothing but a long-winded whine. Since that is the case, I
will refuse to read him any further, but will comment on what others have to
say about him if anything.

However, I am going to do one thing which should make JimmyMac happy. I am
only going to look in on these newsgroups about once a week from now on. I
am simply wasting too much time on all the idiots, morons and imbeciles
which infest these groups - none of whom deserve my Greatness.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Ed Dolan the Great so-and-so - Minnesota???

I see that the midnight poster is still there. Try singing it to the
Stones' Midnight Rambler.

HEAD Dolan wrote...

Quoted message said:

We saw this played out with Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3 of us
have responded to him - with contempt and disdain.

This is interesting. Ed lumps himself together with one whom he claims
it is his life's goal to make misearable (Tom Sherman) and the other
whom he cliams is a scum bucket and a criminal vandal trol (Ed Gin).
Poor Ed. He just can't decide where he stands these days ... must be
senile psychosis setting in. Highly critical of me now and curiously
identifying with two of his adversaries, Ed once wrote of me ... Jim
McNamara has also proven to me that he is both intelligent and right on
all the present issues in referring to my cyber skirmishes withe Ed Gin
and crowd. FACT: Ed Dolan talks out both sides of his mouth ... when
he isn't talking out his ass, that is.

Jim McNamara

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

Quoted message said:

Ed,

Here JimmyMac addresses me as though there is no one else on this group.
That is only his first of many mistakes.

Quoted message said:

Assumptions ... assumptions .... Opinions stated as fact. Nothing ever
changes where Head Swollen Ed Dolan is concerned. I'll tell you what
would make not only me happy, but everyone else too, Ed ... if you'd
take your obnoxious, sorry ass out of here, and for good this time.
Leave and don't come back like you promised you would at least half a
dozen times. You broke that promise as many times as you made it.
Well, so much for your credibility, Ed. If you feel that you are
wasting too much time on the newsgroup inhabitants and they are
unworthy of your self-proclaimed, alleged greatness, then take the
obvious appropriate action. Get the hell out of here and don't let the
door hit you in the ass on the way out.

Speaking of whiners. Quit whining about me giving you what you asked
for. You invited me to take you on in a private email. If you
don't' like the fact that I did as you asked, then you should be
angry with the person responsible ... you. You got exactly what you
asked for. As for focusing on you, Gin and Sherman, Gin is a nemesis
from way back and as I recall you focused pretty well on him yourself.
When Sherman came to the defense of Gin and crowd, of course I focused
on him. Correct me if I am wrong here, but Sherman has been a focus of
yours extending back for years. In case you haven't seen the obvious
difference here, allow me to enlighten you. You are unable to
selectively focus on anyone. You take on just about everyone primarily
because they are not like you, don't hold your values, don't agree
with you, don't give you the respect that you demand. Grow up
HEADward the GRATE!

Yes, JimmyMac has got it right about no one on these freaking cycling groups
proving worthy of me - no, not even the redoubtable Tom Sherman. However, I
do selectively focus on who has ever earned my ire. Sooner or later, that
includes everyone. However, I try not to waste too much time on any one
given individual since they are never worth it.

Quoted message said:

Ed Dolan has often implied that ARBR is HIS domain a place where he
performs housekeeping chores to curtail his inferiors like a cowboy
riding heard on cattle. Recently, he extended his reign to RBM and
another newsgroup that sounds as though it were specifically created
for him ... alt.usenet.kooks. I had a look to find nothing new.

That kooks newsgroup is for LM. I will not post to it (at least not in
conjunction with ARBR and RBM) since it is strictly for kooks. After all,
different universes are involved.

By the way, I can not make even a dent on RBM as it is just way too large a
newsgroup. ARBR is a different story however.

Quoted message said:

Thread after thread-worn thread, one can hear the same old broken
record playing the same old song over and over and over. Ed is in dire
need of new material. He has been regurgitating the same old [censored] now
for years now. I'm not surprised though that he feels the need to look
in only once a week. He was catching a lot of flack from numerous
posters who appreciate him about as much as I do, which is to say not
at all. The bottom line is that Ed has an over-inflated opinion of his
importance. Ed needs to get over himself. Most everyone else has.
The odd thing is that Ed Dolan should know this by now, but he is in
denial.

I will continue to tweak all the dopes that regularly show up on these
cycling groups. They do not deserve someone like me, but I am compassionate
and merciful. How else would they ever learn what fools they are.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

HEAD Dolan wrote...

Quoted message said:

We saw this played out with Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3
of us
have responded to him - with contempt and disdain.

This is interesting. Ed lumps himself together with one whom he claims
it is his life's goal to make misearable (Tom Sherman) and the other
whom he cliams is a scum bucket and a criminal vandal trol (Ed Gin).
Poor Ed. He just can't decide where he stands these days ... must be
senile psychosis setting in. Highly critical of me now and curiously
identifying with two of his adversaries, Ed once wrote of me ... Jim
McNamara has also proven to me that he is both intelligent and right on
all the present issues in referring to my cyber skirmishes withe Ed Gin
and crowd. FACT: Ed Dolan talks out both sides of his mouth ... when
he isn't talking out his ass, that is.

Jim McNamara

FINALLY, JimmyMac has bottom posted!

Tom Sherman and Ed Gin were poles apart, but how you reacted to them was the
same. You are unable to make discriminations based on something so
elementary as character. Do you not know how to read between the lines?

Sherman was a moral person and Gin was not, but you ended up lumping them
together because they would not agree with you. All you could focus on was
their opposition to you. You obviously take everything very personal, but
that is a huge mistake on these freaking newsgroups. If we occasionally say
something in passing that strikes home with another person, it is a miracle.
But mostly we are just talking to ourselves 95% of the time.

You need to come up with a way to deal with me as I am unlike both Sherman
and Gin. But all you know how to do is whine like a woman when you disagree
with anyone about anything. I have absolutely no personal interest in anyone
on these newsgroups. I tweak them for nothing other than sheer amusement.

Bottom line, I do not like your driven personality and your monomania. You
should try to relax more and you might be more likable.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Ed,,

I know this isn't email, but I know how this bugs you, and I top posted
again too ;^)

Sherman and Gin are not one and the same and I never said they were,
but they are not polar opposites. Sherman defended Gin, and I took
issue with that. I did not feel that anyone who defended Gin should be
treated any differently than I treated Gin and that was my choice and
as such is not open for debate.

Sherman was a moral person? Why did you use the past tense of the
verb? Your opinion regarding cyberspace engagement in newsgroups
matters not and is half-baked anyways.

I don't need to come up with a way to deal with you. I will deal with
you as I chose. I have to tell you though that nothing would please me
more than to deal with you up close and personal like. Like someone
else said in the past. If you were to say half the [censored] you do to
someone else in their face instead of from behind that keyboard, you'd
find out how someone deals with the likes of you.

As concerns being more likable, I don't need advise from a
misanthropic, sanctimonious hermit who won't win any popularity
contests. If we were to ever meet face to face, you'd need that
shotgun you are forever threatening people with. For without it
you'd likely get an over-due and much deserved attitude adjustment.

Jim McNamara

Edward Dolan said:

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

HEAD Dolan wrote...

Quoted message said:

We saw this played out with Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how all 3
of us
have responded to him - with contempt and disdain.

This is interesting. Ed lumps himself together with one whom he claims
it is his life's goal to make misearable (Tom Sherman) and the other
whom he cliams is a scum bucket and a criminal vandal trol (Ed Gin).
Poor Ed. He just can't decide where he stands these days ... must be
senile psychosis setting in. Highly critical of me now and curiously
identifying with two of his adversaries, Ed once wrote of me ... Jim
McNamara has also proven to me that he is both intelligent and right on
all the present issues in referring to my cyber skirmishes withe Ed Gin
and crowd. FACT: Ed Dolan talks out both sides of his mouth ... when
he isn't talking out his ass, that is.

Jim McNamara

FINALLY, JimmyMac has bottom posted!

Tom Sherman and Ed Gin were poles apart, but how you reacted to them was the
same. You are unable to make discriminations based on something so
elementary as character. Do you not know how to read between the lines?

Sherman was a moral person and Gin was not, but you ended up lumping them
together because they would not agree with you. All you could focus on was
their opposition to you. You obviously take everything very personal, but
that is a huge mistake on these freaking newsgroups. If we occasionally say
something in passing that strikes home with another person, it is a miracle.
But mostly we are just talking to ourselves 95% of the time.

You need to come up with a way to deal with me as I am unlike both Sherman
and Gin. But all you know how to do is whine like a woman when you disagree
with anyone about anything. I have absolutely no personal interest in anyone
on these newsgroups. I tweak them for nothing other than sheer amusement.

Bottom line, I do not like your driven personality and your monomania. You
should try to relax more and you might be more likable.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Ed,

I address you as you wish to be addressed ... as though were the only
intelligent person here, the only person worthy of attention ... the
great one ... NOT!!! Are you so imperceptible that you don't realize
that I am addressing you because I am writing specifically to you???
Are you really that dense?

Who invited you to "make a dent in RBM"? Who wanted you to? You made
no headway simply because you were met with stern opposition from
numerous people who objected to your presence and your inane drivel.
Why do you fail to recognize that? Has your intellect failed you? Has
the great one become deaf, dumb and blind? You have got to be one of
the most self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-important persons to
venture into cyberspace, the operative word being self, since
misanthropic hermits have no use for their fellow man. What puzzles me
though is that you invest so much of your time in those whom you regard
as your inferiors. Then again what would you have in life if it were
not for the shallow existence that you have in cyberspace where you
have chosen to become a newsgroup squatter.

Jim McNamara

Ed,

I bottom posted. Woops, I'll have to correct that.

Don't you ever tire of these extended sermons of yours.

Sherman and Gin are not one and the same. I never said they were, but
they are not polar opposites either. Sherman defended Gin, and I took
issue with that. I felt that anyone who defended Gin should be treated
no differently than I treated Gin and that was my choice. Just because
you do not understand that concept, does not mean that the issue is
open for debate.

Sherman WAS a moral person? Why did you use the past tense of the
verb? Your observations regarding cyberspace engagement in newsgroups
are half-baked and matter not.

I need to come up with a way to deal with you? I'm doing just fine
.... thanks. No advice is needed. I don't take advice from someone
whom I have no respect for. I will deal with you as I chose. I have
to tell you though that nothing would please me more than to deal with
you up close and personal like. Like someone else said in the past.
If you were to say half the [censored] that you do to someone's face
instead of from behind a keyboard, you'd find out how someone deals
with the likes of you.

As concerns being more likable, I don't need advise from a
misanthropic, sanctimonious hermit who won't win any popularity
contests. If we were to ever meet face to face, you'd need that
shotgun you are forever threatening people with. For without it you'd
likely get an over-due and much deserved attitude adjustment.

The bottom line is that in the greater scheme of things, Ed Dolan
matters not. He thinks otherwise and wishes that others did too, but
alas the mouth that roared ... head swollen, Ed Dolan is his own worst
enemy. He will never achieve the recognition that he so desperately
craves. He will die a lonely man. His legacy will be his insanity.

Jim McNamara

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ed,

I address you as you wish to be addressed ... as though were the only
intelligent person here, the only person worthy of attention ... the
great one ... NOT!!! Are you so imperceptible that you don't realize
that I am addressing you because I am writing specifically to you???
Are you really that dense?

No, you need to address the entire newsgroup, not just me. Otherwise it is
just email. Usenet is NOT email! Try to think of a universe of readers who
will be hanging on your every word. That is what I do and that is why I come
across as intelligent and why you do not.

Quoted message said:

Who invited you to "make a dent in RBM"? Who wanted you to? You made
no headway simply because you were met with stern opposition from
numerous people who objected to your presence and your inane drivel.
Why do you fail to recognize that? Has your intellect failed you? Has
the great one become deaf, dumb and blind? You have got to be one of
the most self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-important persons to
venture into cyberspace, the operative word being self, since
misanthropic hermits have no use for their fellow man. What puzzles me
though is that you invest so much of your time in those whom you regard
as your inferiors. Then again what would you have in life if it were
not for the shallow existence that you have in cyberspace where you
have chosen to become a newsgroup squatter.

RBM has proven to be a huge disappointment to me I must admit. There are
even more idiots, morons and imbeciles there than on ARBR. But even RBM is a
paragon of virtue compared to most other newsgroups.

However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin. Have you also noticed
the absence of Tom Sherman lately. Now you see how critical it is to have
some regulars around to keep the newsgroup going. By the way, this is
something you have never done as far as I can tell. You simply bring your
screeds onto a newsgroup without any consideration for the group as a whole.
Yes, Tom Sherman was my nemesis, but I always appreciated what he was doing
for the group. And I NEVER interfered with his on-topic posting.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

Quoted message said:

Ed,,

I know this isn't email, but I know how this bugs you, and I top posted
again too ;^)

Sherman and Gin are not one and the same and I never said they were,
but they are not polar opposites. Sherman defended Gin, and I took
issue with that. I did not feel that anyone who defended Gin should be
treated any differently than I treated Gin and that was my choice and
as such is not open for debate.

Yes, I do agree with you that Sherman was wrong to defend Gin, but still he
was not anything like Gin. He was merely being loyal to a friend apparently.
As you well know, I hate Gin just as much as you do.

Quoted message said:

Sherman was a moral person? Why did you use the past tense of the
verb? Your opinion regarding cyberspace engagement in newsgroups
matters not and is half-baked anyways.

Well, those posts are in the past now and it seems Tom Sherman is no longer
with us.

Quoted message said:

I don't need to come up with a way to deal with you. I will deal with
you as I chose. I have to tell you though that nothing would please me
more than to deal with you up close and personal like. Like someone
else said in the past. If you were to say half the [censored] you do to
someone else in their face instead of from behind that keyboard, you'd
find out how someone deals with the likes of you.

Now you are acting like a child yet once again. Please try to grow up and
act your age. Remember one thing for sure, not everyone in this world will
like you no matter how you try to please.

Quoted message said:

As concerns being more likable, I don't need advise from a
misanthropic, sanctimonious hermit who won't win any popularity
contests. If we were to ever meet face to face, you'd need that
shotgun you are forever threatening people with. For without it
you'd likely get an over-due and much deserved attitude adjustment.

Poor JimmyMac, ever the child of his primitive emotions. I actually would
like to met Ed Gin in person to perhaps discover what dynamic was in play
there. Ed Gin forged names and addresses, but other than that I do not
believe he was all that bad a person. He called me every name in the book,
but so what, I do that all the time myself. And so does JimmyMac, but he
does it in a very curious roundabout way to say the least.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Quoted message said:

Jim McNamara

Edward Dolan said:

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

HEAD Dolan wrote...

> We saw this played out with Ed Gin and Tom Sherman. Please note how
> all 3
> of us
> have responded to him - with contempt and disdain.

This is interesting. Ed lumps himself together with one whom he claims
it is his life's goal to make misearable (Tom Sherman) and the other
whom he cliams is a scum bucket and a criminal vandal trol (Ed Gin).
Poor Ed. He just can't decide where he stands these days ... must be
senile psychosis setting in. Highly critical of me now and curiously
identifying with two of his adversaries, Ed once wrote of me ... Jim
McNamara has also proven to me that he is both intelligent and right on
all the present issues in referring to my cyber skirmishes withe Ed Gin
and crowd. FACT: Ed Dolan talks out both sides of his mouth ... when
he isn't talking out his ass, that is.

Jim McNamara

FINALLY, JimmyMac has bottom posted!

Tom Sherman and Ed Gin were poles apart, but how you reacted to them was
the
same. You are unable to make discriminations based on something so
elementary as character. Do you not know how to read between the lines?

Sherman was a moral person and Gin was not, but you ended up lumping them
together because they would not agree with you. All you could focus on
was
their opposition to you. You obviously take everything very personal, but
that is a huge mistake on these freaking newsgroups. If we occasionally
say
something in passing that strikes home with another person, it is a
miracle.
But mostly we are just talking to ourselves 95% of the time.

You need to come up with a way to deal with me as I am unlike both
Sherman
and Gin. But all you know how to do is whine like a woman when you
disagree
with anyone about anything. I have absolutely no personal interest in
anyone
on these newsgroups. I tweak them for nothing other than sheer amusement.

Bottom line, I do not like your driven personality and your monomania.
You
should try to relax more and you might be more likable.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

Quoted message said:

Ed,

I bottom posted. Woops, I'll have to correct that.

Don't you ever tire of these extended sermons of yours.

Just do it right and we can get onto other things.
[...]

Quoted message said:

The bottom line is that in the greater scheme of things, Ed Dolan
matters not. He thinks otherwise and wishes that others did too, but
alas the mouth that roared ... head swollen, Ed Dolan is his own worst
enemy. He will never achieve the recognition that he so desperately
craves. He will die a lonely man. His legacy will be his insanity.

Jim, no one will listen to tripe like this. Everyone on these newgroups
knows me better than you think. They know I am just tweaking them and they
have adjusted to it. Sometimes I think that is all Ed Gin was doing to you.
That is basically all that Tom Sherman was doing to you also. Do you not
have any insight at all? Have you ever considered seeking a bit a
psychiatric help for your various hang ups.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Ed,

Hey, brain dead, when are you going to come to the realization that I
do not and will not take advise or direction from you. You are beyond
stupid. I will address you any way I please and labeling the manner in
which I address you as email, does not make it so. Unlike you, I don't
think of the universe comprised of readers hanging on my every word.
That is why you come of as arrogant NOT intelligent.

Screed should be your middle name. You exhibit a classic defense
mechanism in almost all of you post ... projection. You attribute of
others traits and behaviors that you find undesirable in yourself. You
criticize in others the very faults that you manifest.

Jim McNamara

Edward Dolan said:

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ed,

I address you as you wish to be addressed ... as though were the only
intelligent person here, the only person worthy of attention ... the
great one ... NOT!!! Are you so imperceptible that you don't realize
that I am addressing you because I am writing specifically to you???
Are you really that dense?

No, you need to address the entire newsgroup, not just me. Otherwise it is
just email. Usenet is NOT email! Try to think of a universe of readers who
will be hanging on your every word. That is what I do and that is why I come
across as intelligent and why you do not.

Quoted message said:

Who invited you to "make a dent in RBM"? Who wanted you to? You made
no headway simply because you were met with stern opposition from
numerous people who objected to your presence and your inane drivel.
Why do you fail to recognize that? Has your intellect failed you? Has
the great one become deaf, dumb and blind? You have got to be one of
the most self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-important persons to
venture into cyberspace, the operative word being self, since
misanthropic hermits have no use for their fellow man. What puzzles me
though is that you invest so much of your time in those whom you regard
as your inferiors. Then again what would you have in life if it were
not for the shallow existence that you have in cyberspace where you
have chosen to become a newsgroup squatter.

RBM has proven to be a huge disappointment to me I must admit. There are
even more idiots, morons and imbeciles there than on ARBR. But even RBM is a
paragon of virtue compared to most other newsgroups.

However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin. Have you also noticed
the absence of Tom Sherman lately. Now you see how critical it is to have
some regulars around to keep the newsgroup going. By the way, this is
something you have never done as far as I can tell. You simply bring your
screeds onto a newsgroup without any consideration for the group as a whole.
Yes, Tom Sherman was my nemesis, but I always appreciated what he was doing
for the group. And I NEVER interfered with his on-topic posting.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Ed,

Can the condescending lectures. How many time need you be told? I
don't take advice or direction from someone who errantly assumes that
he is my superior. You are right. Everyone on the newsgroups knows
you very well. Have you not heard the many objections to your very
presence and your outrageous rhetoric? Why are you divisive? Why are
you in denial? You are tweaking them? Aren't you the pompous ass?
If they adjusted, then why do they continue to object? Ed Gin and Tom
Sherman and I were taking potshots at one another ... yes, and I
realize that, but enough about them and your diversionary tactics.
This has nothing to do with either of them. This is comical. The man
with a plethora of hang-ups suggests that I get psychiatric help. You
are facetious and delusional. I'll grant you that.

Edward Dolan said:

However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin.

Eddie, Eddie, Eddie

Ed Gin has hardly been on this group in the past couple of years and
only to harass you. How long will you keep whining about Ed Gin. He
got you hook, line and sinker! Your constant harping on Ed Gin proves
that. Get over it! Wah! Wah!! Wah!!!

Recently there was a post on BROL about the decline of ARBR. Ed Gin
was not mentioned. You were top of the list. Of course you know that,
Oh Great One.

How's momma? Is she still working to support you, or did having you as
a lazy, worthless, good for nothing son finally kill her?

Enjoy,

Perry B

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ed,

Hey, brain dead, when are you going to come to the realization that I
do not and will not take advise or direction from you. You are beyond
stupid. I will address you any way I please and labeling the manner in
which I address you as email, does not make it so. Unlike you, I don't
think of the universe comprised of readers hanging on my every word.
That is why you come of as arrogant NOT intelligent.

Screed should be your middle name. You exhibit a classic defense
mechanism in almost all of you post ... projection. You attribute of
others traits and behaviors that you find undesirable in yourself. You
criticize in others the very faults that you manifest.

Jim McNamara

You do not correctly format which makes more work for me. Therefore, I can't
be bothered any further with you. Either format your posts in the acceptable
manner or get lost.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Quoted message said:

Edward Dolan said:

"JimmyMac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Ed,

I address you as you wish to be addressed ... as though were the only
intelligent person here, the only person worthy of attention ... the
great one ... NOT!!! Are you so imperceptible that you don't realize
that I am addressing you because I am writing specifically to you???
Are you really that dense?

No, you need to address the entire newsgroup, not just me. Otherwise it
is
just email. Usenet is NOT email! Try to think of a universe of readers
who
will be hanging on your every word. That is what I do and that is why I
come
across as intelligent and why you do not.

Quoted message said:

Who invited you to "make a dent in RBM"? Who wanted you to? You made
no headway simply because you were met with stern opposition from
numerous people who objected to your presence and your inane drivel.
Why do you fail to recognize that? Has your intellect failed you? Has
the great one become deaf, dumb and blind? You have got to be one of
the most self-absorbed, self-indulgent, self-important persons to
venture into cyberspace, the operative word being self, since
misanthropic hermits have no use for their fellow man. What puzzles me
though is that you invest so much of your time in those whom you regard
as your inferiors. Then again what would you have in life if it were
not for the shallow existence that you have in cyberspace where you
have chosen to become a newsgroup squatter.

RBM has proven to be a huge disappointment to me I must admit. There are
even more idiots, morons and imbeciles there than on ARBR. But even RBM
is a
paragon of virtue compared to most other newsgroups.

However, it may be that I can drag a few intelligent types over to ARBR.
ARBR is now as dead as a door nail thanks to Ed Gin. Have you also
noticed
the absence of Tom Sherman lately. Now you see how critical it is to have
some regulars around to keep the newsgroup going. By the way, this is
something you have never done as far as I can tell. You simply bring your
screeds onto a newsgroup without any consideration for the group as a
whole.
Yes, Tom Sherman was my nemesis, but I always appreciated what he was
doing
for the group. And I NEVER interfered with his on-topic posting.