General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Dishonest Science

Started by BeiYin · · Last activity · 11 posts · 314 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
18 September 2003
Last activity
20 September 2003
Original author
BeiYin
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
314
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Rich Shewmaker said:

    --Rich --> Does anyone else reading this comprehend the article as a
    condemnation of science?

    Quoting this article doesn't mean that there is a condemnation. It
    points out that it is necessary to be realistic and be critical, not
    putting science on a pedestal so that it becomes an untouchable
    authority. Science and scientists are used and misused from people
    interested, for power games or materialistic purposes. Just the fact
    that science is mostly materialistic in its purpose and thinking makes
    it a tool for materialistic goals. This by itself could be a reason
    for condemnation...
    BeiYin

  2. --

    "BeiYin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Rich Shewmaker said:

    --Rich --> Does anyone else reading this comprehend the article as a
    condemnation of science?

    Quoting this article doesn't mean that there is a condemnation. It
    points out that it is necessary to be realistic and be critical, not
    putting science on a pedestal so that it becomes an untouchable
    authority.

    Science is ABOUT being "realistic and critical"!

    Science and scientists are used and misused from people
    interested, for power games or materialistic purposes. Just the fact
    that science is mostly materialistic in its purpose and thinking makes
    it a tool for materialistic goals. This by itself could be a reason
    for condemnation...
    BeiYin

    Science is a method of discovery of the material world. That is a purpose in and of itself, and a worthy one. As for "power games" and "materialistic purposes," science is science. To the extent that it advances human knowledge of the universe, it is good. Criticism of the uses to which that knowledge is put is for the philosophers and theologians. To condemn misused science is like condemning a hammer because it was used as a weapon.

    --Rich

  3. BeiYin said:
    Rich Shewmaker said:

    --Rich --> Does anyone else reading this comprehend the article as a
    condemnation of science?

    Quoting this article doesn't mean that there is a condemnation. It
    points out that it is necessary to be realistic and be critical, not
    putting science on a pedestal so that it becomes an untouchable
    authority. Science and scientists are used and misused from people
    interested, for power games or materialistic purposes. Just the fact
    that science is mostly materialistic in its purpose and thinking makes
    it a tool for materialistic goals. This by itself could be a reason
    for condemnation...
    BeiYin

    BeiYin...SOme common sense here...Ritalin is still used and is being
    used
    incorrectly in my estimation. Theis so-called "Deficit disorder" is
    another
    way of escaping responsibility in raising children with RULES and
    some
    "consequences" for being a rebel! B-0b1

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Robert McCarty said:

    BeiYin...SOme common sense here...Ritalin is still used and is
    being used incorrectly in my estimation. Theis so-called "Deficit
    disorder" is another way of escaping responsibility in raising
    children with RULES and some "consequences" for being a rebel! B-0b1

    Your "estimation" is based on ignorance, just like the rest of your
    claims on any topic thus far.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  5. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Dishonest Science
    From: Robert McCarty [email hidden]
    Date: 9/18/2003 10:14 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    BeiYin said:
    Rich Shewmaker said:

    --Rich --> Does anyone else reading this comprehend the article as a
    condemnation of science?

    Quoting this article doesn't mean that there is a condemnation. It
    points out that it is necessary to be realistic and be critical, not
    putting science on a pedestal so that it becomes an untouchable
    authority. Science and scientists are used and misused from people
    interested, for power games or materialistic purposes. Just the fact
    that science is mostly materialistic in its purpose and thinking makes
    it a tool for materialistic goals. This by itself could be a reason
    for condemnation...
    BeiYin

    BeiYin...SOme common sense here...Ritalin is still used and is being
    used
    incorrectly in my estimation. Theis so-called "Deficit disorder" is
    another
    way of escaping responsibility in raising children with RULES and
    some
    "consequences" for being a rebel! B-0b1

    You got that right!! What did parents use instead of drugs??

    DISCIPLINE!! RESPONSIBILITY!! CONSEQUENCES!! WORK!!

    And that may INCLUDE a swift kick on the bottom if needed. ALL done with love,
    and none of this, if you spank me, I'll call the cops!!

    Jan

  6. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Dishonest Science
    From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
    Date: 9/18/2003 11:52 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Robert McCarty said:

    BeiYin...SOme common sense here...Ritalin is still used and is
    being used incorrectly in my estimation. Theis so-called "Deficit
    disorder" is another way of escaping responsibility in raising
    children with RULES and some "consequences" for being a rebel! B-0b1

    Your "estimation" is based on ignorance, just like the rest of your
    claims on any topic thus far.

    Enter Satan.

    Jan

  7. In said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
    Date: 9/18/2003 11:52 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Your "estimation" is based on ignorance, just like the rest of your
    claims on any topic thus far.

    Enter Satan.

    There you have it, people: disagreeing with Jan over
    anything is pure evil.

    --
    | Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
    | it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
    | for new products or new versions of existing products." |
    end

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    D. C. Sessions said:
    In said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
    Date: 9/18/2003 11:52 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Your "estimation" is based on ignorance, just like the rest of your
    claims on any topic thus far.

    Enter Satan.

    There you have it, people: disagreeing with Jan over
    anything is pure evil.

    Wow! Has she referred to me as Satan before? Am I starring in this
    role? Given her amazing hatred for, e.g., Peter Bowditch, I figured
    he'd be a shoo-in for the postion.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  9. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Dishonest Science
    From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
    Date: 9/18/2003 8:30 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    D. C. Sessions said:
    In said:

    >From: [email hidden] (David Wright)
    >Date: 9/18/2003 11:52 AM Pacific Standard Time
    >Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    >Your "estimation" is based on ignorance, just like the rest of your
    >claims on any topic thus far.

    Enter Satan.

    There you have it, people: disagreeing with Jan over
    anything is pure evil.

    What you have is DC not paying attention in his eagerness to slam Jan. David
    wasn't talking to me, therefore DC's saying David was disagreeing is par for
    the course.

    And of course being the good ole boy and girl club, David didn't notice.

    Quoted message said:

    Wow! Has she referred to me as Satan before?

    Nope.

    Quoted message said:

    Am I starring in this
    role? Given her amazing hatred for, e.g., Peter Bowditch, I figured
    he'd be a shoo-in for the postion.

    There ya go. Another lie. I don't hate Peter, I do hate his lying.

    I am also tired of your one liners of how everyone who disagrees with you is
    stoopid.

    See there, you are guilty of what DC falsely accused me of.

    Give them enough rope,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

    Jan

  10. --

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    There ya go. Another lie. I don't hate Peter, I do hate his lying.

    Jan

    $ KaChing $19

  11. (Jan) said:

    DISCIPLINE!! RESPONSIBILITY!! CONSEQUENCES!! WORK!!

    Jawohl, mein Führer.

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    POLICE - POLIZEI - POLITIE - POLICIA

    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amapolis.htm

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.