Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Comment on the Equipe accusation

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 11 posts · 414 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
27 August 2005
Last activity
30 August 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
414
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The best way to solve this controversy would be request indepent lab
    test for both EPO and a DNA test as well. Now I am not sure how to
    detect contamination. But it seems plausible since EPO would have to be
    introduced directly into Lances sample. Otherwise contaminated trace
    DNA samples would show up. This assumes that the samples are from a
    blood test. It's probably not possible to test urine for DNA....??

  2. <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The best way to solve this controversy would be request indepent lab
    test for both EPO and a DNA test as well. Now I am not sure how to
    detect contamination. But it seems plausible since EPO would have to be
    introduced directly into Lances sample. Otherwise contaminated trace
    DNA samples would show up. This assumes that the samples are from a
    blood test. It's probably not possible to test urine for DNA....??

    Urine * DNA ?

    Good point !
    Can we, with urine (because it is clear that it is urine the Equipe was
    talking about) do a DNA test ???

    Excellent question

  3. who cares? why would you do a DNA test, it wasn't a dope test, it was
    medical research... NOTHING should come of this except for maybe better
    testing methods for the future. End of story.

  4. If according the result of the Lab he used EPO, no doubt about it : he
    is a
    liar and a dishonest.

    No he's not! He's a bike racer... you gonna tell me the guys behind him
    didn't? No, that's not the issue, the issue is one of dope test vs
    medical researche

  5. If according the result of the Lab he used EPO, no doubt about it : he
    is a
    liar and a dishonest.

    No he's not! He's a bike racer... you gonna tell me the guys behind him
    didn't? No, that's not the issue, the issue is one of dope test vs
    medical researche

  6. "IMKen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Clearly this is a "Witch Hunt". If the tests were performed for research
    then they would have used models injected with EPO, taken their urine and
    then tested it. To perform research we have to have some known values.
    To do it in a "Random Manor" would leave the research meaningless.

    Ken

    Don't you mean Wizard Hunt? Looks like the caught the whizzing Wizard.

  7. B. Lafferty says...

    Quoted message said:

    IMKen wrote...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Clearly this is a "Witch Hunt". If the tests were performed for research
    then they would have used models injected with EPO, taken their urine and
    then tested it. To perform research we have to have some known values.
    To do it in a "Random Manor" would leave the research meaningless.

    Quoted message said:

    Don't you mean Wizard Hunt? Looks like the caught the whizzing Wizard.

    Confusious say: "Easy to find what one looks hard enough for - even if not there
    in first place."

  8. A DNA test would show if the sample was indeed Lance's

  9. IMKen a écrit :

    Quoted message said:

    Clearly this is a "Witch Hunt". If the tests were performed for research
    then they would have used models injected with EPO, taken their urine and
    then tested it. To perform research we have to have some known values. To
    do it in a "Random Manor" would leave the research meaningless.

    Sigh. It was already said that WADA wanted the research done to learn to
    what extent the riders had changed their behavior. The research was not
    about the testing technique but about human behavior. You can believe
    this or not, but it sure is rational.

    B

  10. Of course they said that. They had to cover their ass.

    Ken

    "Benjamin Werner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    IMKen a écrit :

    Quoted message said:

    Clearly this is a "Witch Hunt". If the tests were performed for
    research then they would have used models injected with EPO, taken their
    urine and then tested it. To perform research we have to have some known
    values. To do it in a "Random Manor" would leave the research
    meaningless.

    Sigh. It was already said that WADA wanted the research done to learn to
    what extent the riders had changed their behavior. The research was not
    about the testing technique but about human behavior. You can believe this
    or not, but it sure is rational.

    B

  11. Sir Topham Hatt said:

    It's entirely possible the other 11 didn't test positive
    for all three parameters.

    Look at http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/rbr/equipe23aug05.jpg

    Look at flasks 186585 and 186586 on what appears to be stage 2. Neither of
    them are listed as "positive" under the three-test criterion, but if one
    of them happened to be Armstrong's I wouldn't go around saying that they
    proved his innocence.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.