Everyone knows that a pneumatic tire greater than 36" in diameter is the
holy grail of distance riding. Why would someone post that they have
such a thing in this thread and not support it with photographic
evidence? There's not even a description of how it was done. This would
have taken either something extremely clever or an extremely large
investment. One can only assume that given the complete lack of proof
of existence that this is a hoax put forward by someone who desperately
craves attention. Why continue to give such a person any attention
until either the evidence or an apology appears?
--
ħǻřрέŗ
-Greg Harper
*jc is the only main man. there can be no other.*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ħǻřрέŗ's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/16260
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/66279
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com