Paul Boyd wondered:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Accepting the fact that as it's their towpath, they can ask for a permit
if they want, what does this permit actually achieve for the cost of
administering it?
and Tim Hall responded:
Quoted message said:Presumably the ability to withdraw permission should they so wish.
Stops the towpath becoming a right of way.
In the mid 90s they were reportedly planning to start charging for
permits, but that was successfully campaigned against.
I can see two benefits to the permit scheme. Of benefit to all towpath
users, it should increase the proportion of towpath cyclists who have at
least /read/ the Waterways Code. If you get your permit by post, it
will arrive with a copy of the code. If you download a permit then you
agree to follow the Waterways Code and will hopefully follow the link to
the code at <url:http://www.waterscape.com/cycling/permit.html>
Of benefit specifically to cyclists, if you were to encounter another
towpath user (probably an angler) who decided to whinge about bloody
cyclists getting in the way on towpaths and expecting anglers to move
their rods, complaining that you really shouldn't be there, then I
imagine it would be quite satisfying to simply present a permit.
In the early days of permits they were plastic tags that were supposed
to be attached to the handlebar. They were a PITA to carry and I never
used to bother. Last time I downloaded a permit (probably about 3 years
ago) it was simply (after printing and cutting out) a 7x5.5cm piece of
paper that is no problem to keep permanently in my wallet.
Given that it can be downloaded and that that's how most people will get
them, the administration costs ought to be minimal.
--
Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
Reply address is valid, but that on my website is checked more often
"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine