General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Breasts are immunization devices (!))

Started by David Wright · · Last activity · 9 posts · 263 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

01 / Original postRe: Breasts are immunization devices (!))David Wright · 3 Apr 2004 02 / This pagePosts 1–9Page 1 of 1 · chronological order 03 / Latest replyPost #9David Wright · 11 Apr 2004

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
3 April 2004
Last activity
11 April 2004
Original author
David Wright
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
263
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    David Wright
    Archived post
    #1

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    You Ask said:

    This is why Immunotec Research sells HMS-90
    (H)umanized (M)ilk (S)erium 90% protein
    They have replicated mother's milk.
    😉 and they have a medical patent that proves it improves the immune system

    Having a patent on something does NOT prove that it works.

    That's a popular misconception.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    Report
  2. You Ask
    Archived post
    #2

    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    You Ask said:

    This is why Immunotec Research sells HMS-90
    (H)umanized (M)ilk (S)erium 90% protein
    They have replicated mother's milk.
    😉 and they have a medical patent that proves it improves the immune


    system

    Quoted message said:


    Having a patent on something does NOT prove that it works.

    That's a popular misconception.


    A medical patent does have to state the claim and prove it.
    Food patents don't.
    Immunotec Research Ltd. has medical patents

    Quoted message said:

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    Report
  3. David Wright
    Archived post
    #3

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    You Ask said:


    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    You Ask said:

    This is why Immunotec Research sells HMS-90
    (H)umanized (M)ilk (S)erium 90% protein
    They have replicated mother's milk.
    😉 and they have a medical patent that proves it improves the immune
    system

    Having a patent on something does NOT prove that it works.

    That's a popular misconception.


    A medical patent does have to state the claim and prove it.

    Wrong. At least in the United States, the *only* thing that you can't
    patent without demonstrating it works is a perpetual motion machine.

    Quoted message said:

    Food patents don't.
    Immunotec Research Ltd. has medical patents

    Whoopee.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    Report
  4. You Ask
    Archived post
    #4

    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Immunotec Research Ltd. has medical patents

    Whoopee.


    ignorance is bliss
    enjoy your life

    Report
  5. David Wright
    Archived post
    #5

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    You Ask said:


    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Immunotec Research Ltd. has medical patents

    Whoopee.


    ignorance is bliss

    Then you must be a very happy person.

    Quoted message said:

    enjoy your life

    I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like you is one of
    the small pleasures. I suspect you've confused patenting something
    with getting FDA approval for it (which *does* require proof of
    efficacy, unlike a patent).

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    Report
  6. You Ask
    Archived post
    #6

    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Whoopee.


    ignorance is bliss

    Then you must be a very happy person.

    Quoted message said:

    enjoy your life

    I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like you is one of
    the small pleasures. I suspect you've confused patenting something
    with getting FDA approval for it (which *does* require proof of
    efficacy, unlike a patent).


    medical patents require that
    that has been done years ago
    negativity is no substitute for ignorance

    Report
  7. David Wright
    Archived post
    #7

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    You Ask said:


    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >
    > Whoopee.
    >
    ignorance is bliss

    Then you must be a very happy person.

    Quoted message said:

    enjoy your life

    I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like you is one of
    the small pleasures. I suspect you've confused patenting something
    with getting FDA approval for it (which *does* require proof of
    efficacy, unlike a patent).


    medical patents require that
    that has been done years ago
    negativity is no substitute for ignorance

    Let's be a bit more precise here. The degree of proof of efficacy is
    up to the whims of the Patent and Trademark Office, which often does a
    rather poor job (that's why several perpetual motion machine patents
    managed to slide by). In vitro studies might sometimes be accepted.

    FDA approval generally has far more stringent criteria.

    So, as I was saying, a medical patent is not proof that something
    works.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    Report
  8. Are You Experienced
    Archived post
    #8

    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>
    >ignorance is bliss

    Then you must be a very happy person.

    >enjoy your life

    I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like you is one of
    the small pleasures. I suspect you've confused patenting something
    with getting FDA approval for it (which *does* require proof of
    efficacy, unlike a patent).


    medical patents require that
    that has been done years ago
    negativity is no substitute for ignorance

    Let's be a bit more precise here. The degree of proof of efficacy is
    up to the whims of the Patent and Trademark Office, which often does a
    rather poor job (that's why several perpetual motion machine patents
    managed to slide by). In vitro studies might sometimes be accepted.

    invivo (human) studies are better than animal studies

    Report
  9. David Wright
    Archived post
    #9

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Are You Experienced said:


    David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > >>
    > >ignorance is bliss
    >
    > Then you must be a very happy person.
    >
    > >enjoy your life
    >
    > I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like you is one of
    > the small pleasures. I suspect you've confused patenting something
    > with getting FDA approval for it (which *does* require proof of
    > efficacy, unlike a patent).
    >
    medical patents require that
    that has been done years ago
    negativity is no substitute for ignorance

    Let's be a bit more precise here. The degree of proof of efficacy is
    up to the whims of the Patent and Trademark Office, which often does a
    rather poor job (that's why several perpetual motion machine patents
    managed to slide by). In vitro studies might sometimes be accepted.

    invivo (human) studies are better than animal studies

    I'm aware of that. It's also competely irrelevant to the point I was
    making.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    Report

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionGeneral fitness, health and nutrition Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.