Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: bad move by Lance

Started by Jack Hollis · · Last activity · 7 posts · 455 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
8 July 2005
Last activity
11 July 2005
Original author
Jack Hollis
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
455
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:12:21 -0700, Bill Lloyd <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Dumbass -

    Get perspective. He gained 7 seconds.

    When you're a Lance hater, you have to take your shots when you can
    get them.

    Even a little crumb is better than nothing at all.

    That being said, if you don't think that 7 seconds is important, ask
    Laurent Fignon.

  2. Jack Hollis says...

    Quoted message said:

    That being said, if you don't think that 7 seconds is important, ask
    Laurent Fignon.

    Bing! We have a winner! (But that was 8 seconds wasn't it?) Regardless, it
    could be close at the end. Imagine if Lance had to make up big time in the
    final TT! That would make it pretty interesting. My guess is that he'd prefer
    to have a few to spare by that point in time.

  3. Jack Hollis said:

    That being said, if you don't think that 7 seconds is important, ask
    Laurent Fignon.

    http://www.phys.uu.nl/~dronkert/cycling/fl89.jpg

    --
    Firefox Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  4. Jack Hollis said:


    That being said, if you don't think that 7 seconds is important, ask
    Laurent Fignon.

    Dumbass -

    With an extra 7 seconds, Fignon still would have lost.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  5. Kurgan Gringioni said:


    Jack Hollis said:


    That being said, if you don't think that 7 seconds is important, ask
    Laurent Fignon.

    Dumbass -

    With an extra 7 seconds, Fignon still would have lost.

    With that extra cushion he wouldn't have cracked in the last K and
    would have won by at least 1 second.

  6. Jack Hollis said:
    Kurgan Gringioni said:
    Jack Hollis said:


    That being said, if you don't think that 7 seconds is important, ask
    Laurent Fignon.

    Dumbass -

    With an extra 7 seconds, Fignon still would have lost.

    Quoted message said:

    With that extra cushion he wouldn't have cracked in the last K and
    would have won by at least 1 second.

    Normally I don't butt into the pissing matches that Henry
    seems to delight in. But you're totally out to lunch here.
    Fignon left it all on the road, and more.

    Bob Schwartz
    [email hidden]

  7. On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 16:30:20 -0000, Bob Schwartz <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    With an extra 7 seconds, Fignon still would have lost.

    Quoted message said:

    With that extra cushion he wouldn't have cracked in the last K and
    would have won by at least 1 second.

    Normally I don't butt into the pissing matches that Henry
    seems to delight in. But you're totally out to lunch here.
    Fignon left it all on the road, and more.

    Fignon has enough left to crumple into the fetal position on the
    ground.

    Lighten up. I wasn't being serious.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.