Home Road Cycling Re: Armstrong, nobody cares.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
Original section Road Cycling
Published 20 September 2005
Last activity 21 September 2005
Original author Mark & Steven Bornfeld
Posts 10
Discussion status Public discussion
Total views 666
Views / 30 days 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–10 of 10 Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Original post Mark & Steven Bornfeld
Archived post
20 September 2005, 18:16 UTC
#1
D. Ferguson said: And up to a point we SHOULD care. But a few people need a perspective check on the whole thing, too.
Yelling 'doper' and waiting for the magic lightbulb to go off in the public's collective head....... not going to happen.
Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.
Steve
Quoted message said: Hell, if Armstrong came forward and said "I doped in '99" the general population would probably like him even MORE.
-- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDShttp://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001
20 September 2005, 22:37 UTC
#2
Mark & Steven Bornfeld said: Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.
Steve
On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs. You, personally.
Thanks, D
Email address hidden
Archived post
20 September 2005, 23:24 UTC
#3
D'Ferguson said: Mark & Steven Bornfeld <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said: Quoted message said: Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.
Quoted message said: On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs. You, personally.
Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.
20 September 2005, 23:33 UTC
#4
email hidden said:
D'Ferguson said: Mark & Steven Bornfeld <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said: Quoted message said: Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.
Quoted message said: On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs. You, personally.
Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.
Ok, let me rephrase.
Why do you have your legs shaved?
Email address hidden
Archived post
20 September 2005, 23:38 UTC
#5
D. Ferguson said: Quoted message said: D'Ferguson wrote:
Quoted message said: Quoted message said: Quoted message said: On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs. You, personally.
Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.
Ok, let me rephrase.
Why do you have your legs shaved?
All this riding leads to low testosterone counts, so I needed to think up something else to keep the harem busy.
20 September 2005, 23:50 UTC
#6
email hidden said: D. Ferguson said: Quoted message said: D'Ferguson wrote:
Quoted message said: Quoted message said: > On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs. > You, personally.
Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.
Ok, let me rephrase.
Why do you have your legs shaved?
All this riding leads to low testosterone counts, so I needed to think up something else to keep the harem busy.
Perfection.
You, sir, get 50 rbr points for spotting the troll but an additional 200 points for heading it off before it became a long stupid thread.
Impressive.
I would like to add an additional 50 points for not suggesting that leg shaving has any purpose whatsoever. Though I suppose the "massage" reason is a matter of personal preference.
D
Steven Bornfeld
Archived post
21 September 2005, 02:11 UTC
#7
D. Ferguson said: Mark & Steven Bornfeld said: Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.
Steve
On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs. You, personally.
Thanks, D
Personally, I do not. Of course, I haven't raced since '86. ;-)
Steve
-- {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Arial;}} {\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 Remove "nospam" to reply\par }
Steven Bornfeld
Archived post
21 September 2005, 02:13 UTC
#8
Quoted message said: D. Ferguson said: Quoted message said: D'Ferguson wrote:
Quoted message said: Quoted message said: >On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs. >You, personally.
Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.
Ok, let me rephrase.
Why do you have your legs shaved?
All this riding leads to low testosterone counts, so I needed to think up something else to keep the harem busy.
Cyclist's penis strikes again.
Steve
Quoted message said: -- {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Arial;}} {\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 Remove "nospam" to reply\par }
21 September 2005, 02:41 UTC
#9
"Steven Bornfeld" <[email hidden]> wrote ...
Quoted message said: Cyclist's penis strikes again.
I think the medical term is Julich's Johnson.
JF
--http://spaces.msn.com/members/flomblog/
Carl Sundquist
Archived post
21 September 2005, 02:43 UTC
#10
Steven Bornfeld said: Quoted message said: All this riding leads to low testosterone counts, so I needed to think up something else to keep the harem busy.
Cyclist's penis strikes again.
Or not.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
· 0 bots
· 0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.