Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: Armstrong, nobody cares.

Started by Mark & Steven Bornfeld · · Last activity · 10 posts · 666 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
20 September 2005
Last activity
21 September 2005
Original author
Mark & Steven Bornfeld
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
666
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. D. Ferguson said:

    And up to a point we SHOULD care. But a few people need a perspective
    check on the whole thing, too.

    Yelling 'doper' and waiting for the magic lightbulb to go off in the
    public's collective head....... not going to happen.

    Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective
    head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.

    Steve

    Quoted message said:


    Hell, if Armstrong came forward and said "I doped in '99" the general
    population would probably like him even MORE.

    --
    Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
    http://www.dentaltwins.com
    Brooklyn, NY
    718-258-5001

  2. Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:


    Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective
    head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.

    Steve

    On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs.
    You, personally.

    Thanks,
    D

  3. D'Ferguson said:

    Mark & Steven Bornfeld <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective
    head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.

    Quoted message said:

    On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs.
    You, personally.

    Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.

  4. email hidden said:


    D'Ferguson said:

    Mark & Steven Bornfeld <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective
    head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.

    Quoted message said:

    On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs.
    You, personally.

    Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.

    Ok, let me rephrase.

    Why do you have your legs shaved?

  5. D. Ferguson said:
    Quoted message said:

    D'Ferguson wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs.
    You, personally.

    Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.

    Ok, let me rephrase.

    Why do you have your legs shaved?

    All this riding leads to low testosterone counts, so I
    needed to think up something else to keep the harem busy.

  6. email hidden said:
    D. Ferguson said:
    Quoted message said:

    D'Ferguson wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs.
    > You, personally.

    Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.

    Ok, let me rephrase.

    Why do you have your legs shaved?

    All this riding leads to low testosterone counts, so I
    needed to think up something else to keep the harem busy.

    Perfection.

    You, sir, get 50 rbr points for spotting the troll but an additional
    200 points for heading it off before it became a long stupid thread.

    Impressive.

    I would like to add an additional 50 points for not suggesting that
    leg shaving has any purpose whatsoever. Though I suppose the
    "massage" reason is a matter of personal preference.

    D

  7. D. Ferguson said:
    Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

    Course not. I figure if we wondered about the public's collective
    head, we wouldn't shave our legs and wear lycra.

    Steve

    On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs.
    You, personally.

    Thanks,
    D

    Personally, I do not. Of course, I haven't raced since '86. ;-)

    Steve

    --
    {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0
    Arial;}}
    {\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 Remove
    "nospam" to reply\par
    }

  8. Quoted message said:
    D. Ferguson said:
    Quoted message said:

    D'Ferguson wrote:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >On that subject, please explain to me why you shave your legs.
    >You, personally.

    Because nobody else in rbr was doing it for him.

    Ok, let me rephrase.

    Why do you have your legs shaved?

    All this riding leads to low testosterone counts, so I
    needed to think up something else to keep the harem busy.

    Cyclist's penis strikes again.

    Steve

    Quoted message said:

    --
    {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fcharset0
    Arial;}}
    {\*\generator Msftedit 5.41.15.1507;}\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 Remove
    "nospam" to reply\par
    }

  9. "Steven Bornfeld" <[email hidden]> wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    Cyclist's penis strikes again.

    I think the medical term is Julich's Johnson.

    JF

    --
    http://spaces.msn.com/members/flomblog/

  10. Steven Bornfeld said:
    Quoted message said:


    All this riding leads to low testosterone counts, so I
    needed to think up something else to keep the harem busy.

    Cyclist's penis strikes again.

    Or not.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.