Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Re: ARBR - RIP

Started by Mike Fox · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,216 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
14 February 2008
Last activity
29 February 2008
Original author
Mike Fox
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,216
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. And you're the one who destroyed it.

    Quoted message said:
  2. In article
    <[email hidden]>,
    JimmyMac <[email hidden]> wrote:

    I do not understand the Subject: line.
    ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

    --
    Michael Press

  3. Nice Going, Ed! That's telling 'em!

    As usual, your observations are extremely perceptive and right on the
    mark.

    Please keep up the good work!

    We always enjoy reading your posts.

    Best of luck to you.

  4. Michael Press said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    JimmyMac <[email hidden]> wrote:

    I do not understand the Subject: line.
    ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

    --
    Michael Press

    And I don't understand why this was attributed to me, but no biggie.

  5. Michael Press said:


    I do not understand the Subject: line.
    ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.


    And most of the traffic is off-topic posts by Mr. Ed the Grate.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

  6. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    JimmyMac said:
    Michael Press said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    JimmyMac <[email hidden]> wrote:

    I do not understand the Subject: line.
    ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

    And I don't understand why this was attributed to me, but no biggie.

    It is not. Count the quote indentations.
    I was sloppy. I should have left off the
    attribution line or indicated excised text.
    Sorry for the trouble.

    --
    Michael Press

  7. On Feb 25, 8:24 pm, Tom Sherman <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Michael Press said:

    I do not understand the Subject: line.
    ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

    And most of the traffic is off-topic posts by Mr. Ed the Grate.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

    And to be perfectly frank, I have contributed, though primarily to
    pitch a [censored] about HEAD Dolan the GRATE's off-topic posts.

  8. Michael Press said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    JimmyMac said:
    Michael Press said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    JimmyMac <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I do not understand the Subject: line.
    ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

    Quoted message said:

    And I don't understand why this was attributed to me, but no biggie.

    It is not. Count the quote indentations.
    I was sloppy. I should have left off the
    attribution line or indicated excised text.
    Sorry for the trouble.

    --
    Michael Press

    No trouble Michael ... like I previously indicated... no biggie.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.