Chalo Colina said:Tom Sherman said:Chalo Colina said:Tom Sherman wrote:
> Trikes are an area where recumbents are decidedly superior to uprights
> in every important aspect. ๐
Save one-- carrying loads.
Not so:
<http://www.organicengines.com/products/the-sensible-utility-vehicle-a...>.
Where is an upright trike that can exceed the SUV for cargo capacity?
I just helped build one. I'll get back to you on that when I have a
picture. It has a five-foot long front bed, plus a normal Worksman
Adaptable rear load platform. You can stack it up high and still see
over your load. :^)
Sea also:
Channeling gene?
Quoted message said:http://www.cyclesmaximus.com/cargotrike.htm
(for a twist on the usual upright/recumbent comparison, it's a _lot_
more expensive than the OE SUV.)
The OE SUV appears to be a bargain compared to the other trikes.
Quoted message said:http://pedicab.com/pedicabs_pickup.html
http://workcycles.com/workbike/bicycles/professional-worktrikes/workbike-classic-dutch-large.html
Based on the pictures, the trikes in the above three links look to have
similar volume capacity to the SUV - I would need to see specifications
to rank the four by that category.
The Maximus does have a slightly greater cargo weight capacity (250
kgf), the Henry the most (300 kgf), compared to the SUV (225 kgf) [1]
while the weight capacity of the Main Street is unknown.
It would be fun to have all four work trikes in one place to compare
handling and general ease of use.
[1] However the SUV has a combined rider plus cargo capacity of 340 kgf,
while the others do not list rider capacity. However, they look to be
"Chalo" sturdy.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
"Localized intense suction such as tornadoes is created when temperature
differences are high enough between meeting air masses, and can impart
excessive energy onto a cyclist." - Randy Schlitter