General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: 365# double

Started by T · · Last activity · 10 posts · 248 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 April 2005
Last activity
28 April 2005
Original author
T
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
248
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hugh Beyer said:

    T <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom, no wraps, no
    belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....

    135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A minute or so
    between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten minutes
    between the failed 375 and the 365 double.

    Baby's got a new max working weight, oh yeah.

    Happiness. :-)

    Dinner at 8, no dancing after, though, I think.

    T the Magnificent

    Woot woot, good for you, and *how* much do you weigh?

    Hugh

    143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.

  2. T said:
    Hugh Beyer said:

    T <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom, no wraps,
    no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....

    135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A minute or so
    between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten minutes
    between the failed 375 and the 365 double.

    Baby's got a new max working weight, oh yeah.

    Happiness. :-)

    Dinner at 8, no dancing after, though, I think.

    T the Magnificent

    Woot woot, good for you, and *how* much do you weigh?

    Hugh

    143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.

    Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.

    --Falooley

  3. "Bob Falooley" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    T said:
    Hugh Beyer said:

    T <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    > A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom, no wraps,
    > no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....
    >
    > 135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A minute or so
    > between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten minutes
    > between the failed 375 and the 365 double.
    >
    > Baby's got a new max working weight, oh yeah.
    >
    > Happiness. :-)
    >
    > Dinner at 8, no dancing after, though, I think.
    >
    >
    >
    > T the Magnificent

    Woot woot, good for you, and *how* much do you weigh?

    Hugh

    143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.

    Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.

    --Falooley


    Dudette. :-)

    Theresa

  4. "T" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Bob Falooley" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    T said:

    Hugh Beyer wrote:

    > T <[email hidden]> wrote in
    > news:[email hidden]:
    >
    >
    >> A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom, no wraps,
    >> no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....
    >>
    >> 135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A minute or so
    >> between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten minutes
    >> between the failed 375 and the 365 double.
    >>
    >> Baby's got a new max working weight, oh yeah.
    >>
    >> Happiness. :-)
    >>
    >> Dinner at 8, no dancing after, though, I think.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> T the Magnificent
    >
    >
    >
    > Woot woot, good for you, and *how* much do you weigh?
    >
    > Hugh
    >

    143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.

    Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.

    --Falooley


    Dudette. :-)

    Now I'm seriously impressed. Well done.

  5. On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:04:05 GMT, "T" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:


    "Bob Falooley" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    T said:

    Hugh Beyer wrote:

    > T <[email hidden]> wrote in
    > news:[email hidden]:
    >
    >
    >> A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom, no wraps,
    >> no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....
    >>
    >> 135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A minute or so
    >> between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten minutes
    >> between the failed 375 and the 365 double.
    >>
    >> Baby's got a new max working weight, oh yeah.
    >>
    >> Happiness. :-)
    >>
    >> Dinner at 8, no dancing after, though, I think.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> T the Magnificent
    >
    >
    >
    > Woot woot, good for you, and *how* much do you weigh?
    >
    > Hugh
    >

    143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.

    Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.

    --Falooley


    Dudette. :-)


    You should compete.

  6. Quoted message said:


    "T" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Bob Falooley" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    T wrote:
    > Hugh Beyer wrote:
    >
    >> T <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >> news:[email hidden]:
    >>
    >>
    >>> A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom, no wraps,
    >>> no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....
    >>>
    >>> 135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A minute or so
    >>> between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten minutes
    >>> between the failed 375 and the 365 double.
    >>>
    >>> Baby's got a new max working weight, oh yeah.
    >>>
    >>> Happiness. :-)
    >>>
    >>> Dinner at 8, no dancing after, though, I think.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> T the Magnificent
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Woot woot, good for you, and *how* much do you weigh?
    >>
    >> Hugh
    >>
    >
    > 143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.

    Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.

    --Falooley


    Dudette. :-)

    Now I'm seriously impressed. Well done.

    Indeed.

    -----------
    Proton Soup

    "And all this peace has been deceiving,
    I need some wind to get me sailing"

  7. "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:04:05 GMT, "T" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:


    "Bob Falooley" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    T wrote:
    > Hugh Beyer wrote:
    >
    >> T <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >> news:[email hidden]:
    >>
    >>
    >>> A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom, no wraps,
    >>> no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....
    >>>
    >>> 135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A minute or so
    >>> between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten minutes
    >>> between the failed 375 and the 365 double.
    >>>
    >>> Baby's got a new max working weight, oh yeah.
    >>>
    >>> Happiness. :-)
    >>>
    >>> Dinner at 8, no dancing after, though, I think.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> T the Magnificent
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Woot woot, good for you, and *how* much do you weigh?
    >>
    >> Hugh
    >>
    >
    > 143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.

    Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.

    --Falooley


    Dudette. :-)


    You should compete.

    Why?

  8. On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:04:46 GMT, "T" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:


    "John Hanson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:04:05 GMT, "T" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    misc.fitness.weights:

    Quoted message said:


    "Bob Falooley" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >T wrote:
    >> Hugh Beyer wrote:
    >>
    >>> T <[email hidden]> wrote in
    >>> news:[email hidden]:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom, no wraps,
    >>>> no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....
    >>>>
    >>>> 135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A minute or so
    >>>> between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten minutes
    >>>> between the failed 375 and the 365 double.
    >>>>
    >>>> Baby's got a new max working weight, oh yeah.
    >>>>
    >>>> Happiness. :-)
    >>>>
    >>>> Dinner at 8, no dancing after, though, I think.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> T the Magnificent
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Woot woot, good for you, and *how* much do you weigh?
    >>>
    >>> Hugh
    >>>
    >>
    >> 143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.
    >
    > Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.
    >
    > --Falooley
    >
    Dudette. :-)


    You should compete.

    Why?


    You'd do quite well in competition. Priscilla would still beat you
    though but you'd have a good shot at second in the women's open in the
    USAPL.

  9. Badger_South said:

    On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:24:01 -0400, Badger_South <[email hidden]>


    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    DZ said:

    T <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > "Bob Falooley" <[email hidden]> wrote
    >>T wrote:
    >>> Hugh Beyer wrote:
    >>>> T <[email hidden]> wrote
    >>>>> A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom,


    no wraps,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>> no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....
    >>>>>
    >>>>> 135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A


    minute or so

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>> between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten


    minutes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>> between the failed 375 and the 365 double.
    >>
    >>>> *how* much do you weigh?
    >>> 143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.
    >>
    >> Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.
    >>
    > Dudette. :-)

    That is still very impressive!

    In 2003, Amy Weisberger in the 132lb pro division got a WR 515


    squat, and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    at 148lbs, Mariah Liggett got a 510 in the squat, another WR.

    Oops, forgot to add, they were probably wearing squat suits, wraps


    and belt

    Quoted message said:

    - usually good for an additional 50lbs or so.

    Actually probably a lot more than 50lbs. Back in the mid-90s I saw
    lifters wearing single ply poly go from 550 to 390 and 660 to 450
    lifting raw (comp numbers done within a few months of each other, not
    gym lifts) and Amy Weisberger is probably wearing multi-ply and the
    latest technology denim or canvas or poly or some combination. Their
    lifts should not even be mentioned in the same sentence as your 365
    raw, no belt double. Nice going.

  10. In article <[email hidden]>,

    zxcv said:
    Badger_South said:

    On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:24:01 -0400, Badger_South <[email hidden]>


    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 22:18:35 +0000 (UTC), DZ
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >T <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> "Bob Falooley" <[email hidden]> wrote
    >>>T wrote:
    >>>> Hugh Beyer wrote:
    >>>>> T <[email hidden]> wrote
    >>>>>> A little over two and a half times bodyweight, rock bottom,


    no wraps,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>>> no belt, no spotter (in the rack, though)....
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> 135x3, 225x3, 315, 335, 345, 355, 365, 375x0, 365x2. A


    minute or so

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>>> between warmup sets, 2-3 minutes between singles, about ten


    minutes

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>>>>> between the failed 375 and the 365 double.
    >>>
    >>>>> *how* much do you weigh?
    >>>> 143 or 144, the scale is dithering a little.
    >>>
    >>> Damn dude, you are really strong, good job.
    >>>
    >> Dudette. :-)
    >
    >That is still very impressive!

    In 2003, Amy Weisberger in the 132lb pro division got a WR 515


    squat, and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    at 148lbs, Mariah Liggett got a 510 in the squat, another WR.

    Oops, forgot to add, they were probably wearing squat suits, wraps


    and belt

    Quoted message said:

    - usually good for an additional 50lbs or so.

    Actually probably a lot more than 50lbs. Back in the mid-90s I saw
    lifters wearing single ply poly go from 550 to 390 and 660 to 450
    lifting raw (comp numbers done within a few months of each other, not
    gym lifts) and Amy Weisberger is probably wearing multi-ply and the
    latest technology denim or canvas or poly or some combination. Their
    lifts should not even be mentioned in the same sentence as your 365
    raw, no belt double. Nice going.

    Priscilla Ribic also squats in the mid 500s at 148, in a Titan poly and
    wraps. She's probably getting 100+ lbs out of the combination though.
    Priscilla is a seriously strong woman and I wouldn't be surprised if she
    could double 365 rock bottom raw, but she's a world class competitor.
    Very nice lift T.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.