http://velonews.com/tech/report/articles/5149.0.html
UCI bans disc brakes from 'cross events
By Andrew Juskaitis
VeloNews Technical Editor
This report filed October 20, 2003
A new technical edict from cycling's international governing body has
sent professional cyclo-cross racers scrambling for new equipment... and
maybe grasping for an explanation. =
According to a technical updated posted to USA Cycling's website,
professional cyclo-cross racers will no longer be able to run disc
brakes in UCI sanctioned events. According to the report, the ban will
take effect on November 1, 2003, forcing riders and sponsors to quickly
re-equip bikes. =
In some cases, that replacement doesn't come easily. According to Chris
Peck, Cannondale's director of research and development, "it's a big
problem for us because our sponsored cyclo-cross athletes are running
our disc specific =91cross bike which can only accept disc brakes, the
seat stays are too light to accept cantilevers. This means we're going
to have to build six new =91cross bikes by the November deadline which is=
possible, but is cutting it kind of close. I can't understand why the
UCI made this decision. It doesn't make any sense to us here at
Cannondale. Were certainly going to try and change the minds of the UCI
so we can continue to race the latest technology." =
Calls and e-mails to UCI officials remained unanswered as we posted this
article, but manufacturers have eagerly responded to questions about the
new rule. =
Craig Wright of Redline Bicycles (which recently introduced a disc
specific =91cross bike) responded, "We find this news to be disappointing=
as we wait to hear the reasons for this ruling. With all the recent
improvements in disc brake technology we knew it was just a matter of
time before disc brakes ended up on =91cross bikes. Disc brake work bette=
r
in adverse conditions. We listened to many riders who wanted discs, and
after trying them, felt like they had improved control. We know that
discs are not for everyone, we never planned to make our bikes a
100-percent disc, but the UCI's decision to ban the use of disc brakes
seams a little overboard." =
Stu Thorne, owner of cyclocross.com and sponsor of a handful of
UCI-competing =91crossers, said the decision might just be an
over-reaction to an influx of largely American technology in solidly
European sport. =
"I think it's typical of the UCI to make a decision like this," Thorne
said. "I think they're just afraid of technical advancement. The
Europeans are years off from adopting disc brake technology on =91cross
bikes, so it's really no surprise that the UCI would want to squash any
development of this mostly American-based technology. I think they want
to keep the bikes very traditional, which is to say, with
cantilever-style brakes. Other than being sticklers for traditionalism,
I can't understand why they'd make such a decision." =
The rule, however, is not in effect for USCF cyclo-cross events that are
not on the international calendar, including other non-UCI categories
run in conjunction with a UCI-sanctioned event. =
gooserider said:=
Quoted message said:"Luigi de Guzman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:28:18 -0500, Mike Schwab <[email hidden]>=
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Per UCI rules, racers must purchase comercially availble bicycles an=
d
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:components. Experimental parts not permitted. Sizing to a customer=
s
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:size is permitted.
If "experimental" parts are prohibited, then why are the guys in the
peloton sometimes riding components that you can't buy (yet) at your
local shop?
=
Quoted message said:Would you say there's a difference between "experimental" and "next yea=
r's
Quoted message said:model"?
=
Quoted message said:Mike