Road Cycling · Public discussion

rb-misc In the News

Started by Thornhill · · Last activity · 8 posts · 357 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
14 July 2004
Last activity
21 July 2004
Original author
Thornhill
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
357
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://cgi.citizen-times.com/cgi-bin/story/business/57981

    in part...
    "And the remarkable thing about Trek is that they give me the same
    frames for the sales floor that Lance rides in the Tour," said Mike
    Jacoubowsky, a bike retailer in Northern California.

  2. Per UCI rules, racers must purchase comercially availble bicycles and
    components. Experimental parts not permitted. Sizing to a customers
    size is permitted.

    Thornhill said:


    http://cgi.citizen-times.com/cgi-bin/story/business/57981

    in part...
    "And the remarkable thing about Trek is that they give me the same
    frames for the sales floor that Lance rides in the Tour," said Mike
    Jacoubowsky, a bike retailer in Northern California.

  3. On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:28:18 -0500, Mike Schwab <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Per UCI rules, racers must purchase comercially availble bicycles and
    components. Experimental parts not permitted. Sizing to a customers
    size is permitted.

    If "experimental" parts are prohibited, then why are the guys in the
    peloton sometimes riding components that you can't buy (yet) at your
    local shop?

    -Luigi


  4. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: rb-misc In the News
    From: Mike Schwab [email hidden]
    Date: 7/14/2004 3:28 AM US Eastern Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Per UCI rules, racers must purchase comercially availble bicycles and
    components. Experimental parts not permitted. Sizing to a customers
    size is permitted.

    What exactly does that mean if you don't mind me asking?

  5. "Luigi de Guzman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:28:18 -0500, Mike Schwab <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Per UCI rules, racers must purchase comercially availble bicycles and
    components. Experimental parts not permitted. Sizing to a customers
    size is permitted.

    If "experimental" parts are prohibited, then why are the guys in the
    peloton sometimes riding components that you can't buy (yet) at your
    local shop?

    Would you say there's a difference between "experimental" and "next year's
    model"?

    Mike

  6. Quoted message said:

    Per UCI rules, racers must purchase comercially availble bicycles and
    components. Experimental parts not permitted. Sizing to a customers
    size is permitted.

    Show me that rule, I don't believe it exists.

    Chris Neary
    [email hidden]

    "Science, freedom, beauty, adventure: what more could
    you ask of life? Bicycling combined all the elements I
    loved" - Adapted from a quotation by Charles Lindbergh

  7. http://velonews.com/tech/report/articles/5262.1.html
    Finally, received this letter from Steven Sheffield of Salt Lake City,
    Utah who keenly noticed that Oval Concepts was successful in getting its
    JetStream fork approved by the UCI after it was initially banned when
    team Saeco ran it during the Giro. Hopefully this will give those
    manufacturers fighting to get disc brakes legalized on =91cross bikes a
    bit of hope. =

    Dear VeloNews;
    Hey, look ... the system works!!! Oval Concepts didn't play by the rules
    when outfitting the Saeco team's time trial bikes with their Jetstream
    Aero forks during the Giro d'Italia, and got spanked when notified that
    the forks were banned as new technology ... but instead of whinging
    about it for months on end, they submitted their designs for approval,
    and wonder of wonders, the UCI granted their request!
    So much for everyone's comments that the UCI is trying to keep American
    technology and innovation out of road racing (and cyclo-cross) ...
    because the Oval Concept forks are certainly one of the most innovative
    designs I've seen being introduced in a while.

    Steven L. Sheffield
    Salt Lake City =

    gooserider said:

    =

    Quoted message said:

    "Luigi de Guzman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:28:18 -0500, Mike Schwab <[email hidden]>=

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Per UCI rules, racers must purchase comercially availble bicycles an=


    d

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    components. Experimental parts not permitted. Sizing to a customer=


    s

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    size is permitted.

    If "experimental" parts are prohibited, then why are the guys in the
    peloton sometimes riding components that you can't buy (yet) at your
    local shop?


    =

    Quoted message said:

    Would you say there's a difference between "experimental" and "next yea=


    r's

    Quoted message said:

    model"?
    =

    Quoted message said:

    Mike

  8. http://velonews.com/tech/report/articles/5149.0.html

    UCI bans disc brakes from 'cross events
    By Andrew Juskaitis
    VeloNews Technical Editor
    This report filed October 20, 2003
    A new technical edict from cycling's international governing body has
    sent professional cyclo-cross racers scrambling for new equipment... and
    maybe grasping for an explanation. =

    According to a technical updated posted to USA Cycling's website,
    professional cyclo-cross racers will no longer be able to run disc
    brakes in UCI sanctioned events. According to the report, the ban will
    take effect on November 1, 2003, forcing riders and sponsors to quickly
    re-equip bikes. =

    In some cases, that replacement doesn't come easily. According to Chris
    Peck, Cannondale's director of research and development, "it's a big
    problem for us because our sponsored cyclo-cross athletes are running
    our disc specific =91cross bike which can only accept disc brakes, the
    seat stays are too light to accept cantilevers. This means we're going
    to have to build six new =91cross bikes by the November deadline which is=

    possible, but is cutting it kind of close. I can't understand why the
    UCI made this decision. It doesn't make any sense to us here at
    Cannondale. Were certainly going to try and change the minds of the UCI
    so we can continue to race the latest technology." =

    Calls and e-mails to UCI officials remained unanswered as we posted this
    article, but manufacturers have eagerly responded to questions about the
    new rule. =

    Craig Wright of Redline Bicycles (which recently introduced a disc
    specific =91cross bike) responded, "We find this news to be disappointing=

    as we wait to hear the reasons for this ruling. With all the recent
    improvements in disc brake technology we knew it was just a matter of
    time before disc brakes ended up on =91cross bikes. Disc brake work bette=
    r
    in adverse conditions. We listened to many riders who wanted discs, and
    after trying them, felt like they had improved control. We know that
    discs are not for everyone, we never planned to make our bikes a
    100-percent disc, but the UCI's decision to ban the use of disc brakes
    seams a little overboard." =

    Stu Thorne, owner of cyclocross.com and sponsor of a handful of
    UCI-competing =91crossers, said the decision might just be an
    over-reaction to an influx of largely American technology in solidly
    European sport. =

    "I think it's typical of the UCI to make a decision like this," Thorne
    said. "I think they're just afraid of technical advancement. The
    Europeans are years off from adopting disc brake technology on =91cross
    bikes, so it's really no surprise that the UCI would want to squash any
    development of this mostly American-based technology. I think they want
    to keep the bikes very traditional, which is to say, with
    cantilever-style brakes. Other than being sticklers for traditionalism,
    I can't understand why they'd make such a decision." =

    The rule, however, is not in effect for USCF cyclo-cross events that are
    not on the international calendar, including other non-UCI categories
    run in conjunction with a UCI-sanctioned event. =

    gooserider said:

    =

    Quoted message said:

    "Luigi de Guzman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 03:28:18 -0500, Mike Schwab <[email hidden]>=

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Per UCI rules, racers must purchase comercially availble bicycles an=


    d

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    components. Experimental parts not permitted. Sizing to a customer=


    s

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    size is permitted.

    If "experimental" parts are prohibited, then why are the guys in the
    peloton sometimes riding components that you can't buy (yet) at your
    local shop?


    =

    Quoted message said:

    Would you say there's a difference between "experimental" and "next yea=


    r's

    Quoted message said:

    model"?
    =

    Quoted message said:

    Mike

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.