SteveO said:On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:18:15 +0100, compo <[email hidden]>
wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:I think that his attitude towards the indians on his prog last week was
patronising. He seems to be of the opinion that indians should be
denied the luxuries of modern civilization and have to grub around for
roots and stuff in order to survive.
Quoted message said:That's not how I saw it; ISTR that he was focusing on the values of
villages and villagers maintaining their indigenous skills and
knowledge at the same time as they did everything else. The village in
the first Amazonian "episode" (week before) had villagers nominated to
show/teach their native skills just to "keep those skills alive". The
village at the end of his trek last week, his final destination
(Yeneck?), were in a different situation; their village was communally
growing cotton. Within the village there was only one woman, elderly,
who could remember how to spin cotton "the old way". She put the loss
of the skill down to social changes in the village such as children
not being around their family to learn the skills (because they were
in school and such like).
I recall discussing the kitchen skills and practices of different
cultures with a Thai student of mine. He regretted not having learnt
the wonderful skills of his grandmother, now dead. I asked what skills
he meant, since he was an extemely good Thai cook. He said his
grandmother could go off into the jungle with a cooking pot and a
knife, and five hours later have a nice stew boiling on a camp fire,
with a good tasty mix of vegetables and animals in it.
--
Chris Malcolm [email hidden] +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205
IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]