It appears Rasmussen was the only one able to make a big charge on day 8. He had a couple follow him in at about 2:30 plus behind but not really close. Could it be he his juiced? With all the riders not able to sustain a long charge up the mountains and not able to recover it appears the doping may be on the decline. I hope Rasmussen is clean but I have my doubts at this point. We may see an article come out in a few weeks about a positive test in race. He clearly is at another level from all the other riders! I agree it is way to early to count anyone out who is within 6 minutes, but a juiced up Rasmussen could spell the end for everyone else who is clean and riding without chemical assistance. I think it is obvious that Vino and LL are clean by the way they are riding at this point. Vino said he was cramping at the end of stage 8. I don't think cramping and doping go together. Bring on day 9!!! Viva La Tour De France!!!!
Professional Cycling · Public discussion
Rasmussen doped?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Professional Cycling
- Published
- 16 July 2007
- Last activity
- 1 April 2009
- Original author
- leerobbs
- Posts
- 47
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 5,520
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
leerobbs said:
It appears Rasmussen was the only one able to make a big charge on day 8. He had a couple follow him in at about 2:30 plus behind but not really close. Could it be he his juiced? With all the riders not able to sustain a long charge up the mountains and not able to recover it appears the doping may be on the decline. I hope Rasmussen is clean but I have my doubts at this point. We may see an article come out in a few weeks about a positive test in race. He clearly is at another level from all the other riders! I agree it is way to early to count anyone out who is within 6 minutes, but a juiced up Rasmussen could spell the end for everyone else who is clean and riding without chemical assistance. I think it is obvious that Vino and LL are clean by the way they are riding at this point. Vino said he was cramping at the end of stage 8. I don't think cramping and doping go together. Bring on day 9!!! Viva La Tour De France!!!!
Poor troll post.
Rasmussen has always been a fierce climber. He has little in the way of challengers on that count.
Vino has lost enough skin this last week to make a football with. Doping or not they don't make drugs that good to get him back on top that fast.
-
[censored], i don't know how you watch Cycling. If someone puts in a great preformance, why must he be doped. Mabye he is talented, and ate right and trained hard. Maybe he is doped, but not because he won, but because he is a professional bike rider.
-
leerobbs said:
It appears Rasmussen was the only one able to make a big charge on day 8. He had a couple follow him in at about 2:30 plus behind but not really close. Could it be he his juiced? With all the riders not able to sustain a long charge up the mountains and not able to recover it appears the doping may be on the decline. I hope Rasmussen is clean but I have my doubts at this point. We may see an article come out in a few weeks about a positive test in race. He clearly is at another level from all the other riders! I agree it is way to early to count anyone out who is within 6 minutes, but a juiced up Rasmussen could spell the end for everyone else who is clean and riding without chemical assistance. I think it is obvious that Vino and LL are clean by the way they are riding at this point. Vino said he was cramping at the end of stage 8. I don't think cramping and doping go together. Bring on day 9!!! Viva La Tour De France!!!!
Have you seen the last three tour or are you a virgin? You should know Rasmussen, I bet my house on him today.
-
leerobbs said:
It appears Rasmussen was the only one able to make a big charge on day 8. He had a couple follow him in at about 2:30 plus behind but not really close. Could it be he his juiced? With all the riders not able to sustain a long charge up the mountains and not able to recover it appears the doping may be on the decline. I hope Rasmussen is clean but I have my doubts at this point. We may see an article come out in a few weeks about a positive test in race. He clearly is at another level from all the other riders! I agree it is way to early to count anyone out who is within 6 minutes, but a juiced up Rasmussen could spell the end for everyone else who is clean and riding without chemical assistance. I think it is obvious that Vino and LL are clean by the way they are riding at this point. Vino said he was cramping at the end of stage 8. I don't think cramping and doping go together. Bring on day 9!!! Viva La Tour De France!!!!
Could the moderator please merge this topic with the other one entitled "Dumbest Comment of The Tour (so far)"? 🙄
-
Eagle of Toledo said:
Could the moderator please merge this topic with the other one entitled "Dumbest Comment of The Tour (so far)"? 🙄
Great Idea -
Rasmussen did the same thing in 2005, destroyed the Pelleton and, had he been able to TT, would have won the Tour. But alas, he fell, what 3 times?, on a TT? Poor guy.
He has no peers in the mountains.
-
Frihed89 said:
Rasmussen did the same thing in 2005, destroyed the Pelleton and, had he been able to TT, would have won the Tour. But alas, he fell, what 3 times?, on a TT? Poor guy.
He has no peers in the mountains.
That was one ugly time trial. The next day, I was on an easy training ride and due to pure inattention, briefly went off the edge of the road. Another rider pulled up next to me and said "Dang, you almost pulled a Rasmussen!"
-
The Double Zero said:
Have you seen the last three tour or are you a virgin? You should know Rasmussen, I bet my house on him today.
I've been watching the tour for years. You would think that with all the best riders in the world there would be at least a couple that could climb with Rasmussen. How is he so very much better than anyone else? When we have had someone else who is consistently better than the rest, doping is assumed. -
He did it in 05', 06' and now 07', either he's one of the best drug test scammers in the history of the world, or he's just great in the mountains. Why don't you go and look at the archives, this race is loaded with individual greatness. If you want to believe they were all dopers, than so be it.
-
leerobbs said:
It appears Rasmussen was the only one able to make a big charge on day 8. He had a couple follow him in at about 2:30 plus behind but not really close. Could it be he his juiced? With all the riders not able to sustain a long charge up the mountains and not able to recover it appears the doping may be on the decline. I hope Rasmussen is clean but I have my doubts at this point. We may see an article come out in a few weeks about a positive test in race. He clearly is at another level from all the other riders! I agree it is way to early to count anyone out who is within 6 minutes, but a juiced up Rasmussen could spell the end for everyone else who is clean and riding without chemical assistance. I think it is obvious that Vino and LL are clean by the way they are riding at this point. Vino said he was cramping at the end of stage 8. I don't think cramping and doping go together. Bring on day 9!!! Viva La Tour De France!!!!
What rubbish. Quite an insult to a dedicated climber. How you can say that about Rasmussen and then say riders like vino & others are clean is laughable -
leerobbs said:
I've been watching the tour for years. You would think that with all the best riders in the world there would be at least a couple that could climb with Rasmussen. How is he so very much better than anyone else? When we have had someone else who is consistently better than the rest, doping is assumed.
You obviously don't understand pro bike racing. Generally he doesn't ride for overall due to his poor time trialling. The GC contenders were never going to follow him. -
Frihed89 said:
Rasmussen did the same thing in 2005, destroyed the Pelleton and, had he been able to TT, would have won the Tour. But alas, he fell, what 3 times?, on a TT? Poor guy.
He has no peers in the mountains.
More like in 05, the Peloton let him go.
Yesterday was more of a destruction though the big GC boys probably don't consider him a true threat to win the Jersey in Paris.
-
NJK said:
You obviously don't understand pro bike racing. Generally he doesn't ride for overall due to his poor time trialling. The GC contenders were never going to follow him.
Obviously not to your degree of knowledge. I will sit at your feet and be educated. Please begin my first lesson professor. Please explain Pererro from last year. -
leerobbs said:
Obviously not to your degree of knowledge. I will sit at your feet and be educated. Please begin my first lesson professor. Please explain Pererro from last year.
30 minute breakaway you drooling [censored]... and to your original idiotic post: they don't call him chicken legs for nothing, he is a climbing specialist winning a climbing stage with a finish at the top of the last climb for christ's sake. 🙄 -
wilmar13 said:
30 minute breakaway you drooling [censored]... and to your original idiotic post: they don't call him chicken legs for nothing, he is a climbing specialist winning a climbing stage with a finish at the top of the last climb for christ's sake. 🙄
Professor Wilmar you made my point. Last year they did not go after Perrero because he was not a serious threat for the GC and they screwed up and he will probably be declared the winner. This year they don't go after Rasmussen and he puts up time in the mountains because he is not a serious threat for the GC. Is he a serious threat... I don't know but time will tell. I don't think his chicken legs have anything to do whether he will win or lose. I really don't need to be reminded about the time of the break last year since I brought it up. You can wip your mouth with the bib you have snapped around your neck cause you are starting to drool yourself and keep your bigoted remarks about the handicapped to yourself. -
leerobbs said:
You can wip your mouth with the bib you have snapped around your neck cause you are starting to drool yourself and keep your bigoted remarks about the handicapped to yourself.
LOL, yeah that was a dickish comment on my part... the retarded should be allowed to post without fear of ridicule same as the rest of us. I always forget about the disabilities act. 😉 -
wilmar13 said:
LOL, yeah that was a dickish comment on my part... the retarded should be allowed to post without fear of ridicule same as the rest of us. I always forget about the disabilities act. 😉
The distinguished professsor Wilmar13 strikes again with a brilliant comment. The insensitive hater just keeps on hating. I bet he always forgets that old disabilities act...its such a pain. The disabled are such an easy target for the wily ole professor. I hope he does'nt have to be inconvienced by them! -
leerobbs said:
The distinguished professsor Wilmar13 strikes again with a brilliant comment. The insensitive hater just keeps on hating. I bet he always forgets that old disabilities act...its such a pain. The disabled are such an easy target for the wily ole professor. I hope he does'nt have to be inconvienced by them!
Wow man, it was a joke and I was admitting my mistake for being a [censored]...
😕
Yes my post was meant to hurt retarded people, and had nothing to do with the poster who insinuated that a climbing specialist is probably a doper (any more than the others) because he was the winner of a climbing stage of the tour. 😄 -
A climber like Ras should put minutes into most of his rivals. He is a specialist.... Some guys can climb, some guys can sprint. No one questioned McEwen, Boonen, Cipo when they blow the field away. And they do on every sprint compared to most riders in the pack. To think dope has to be involved in every ride that seperates the specialists from the average riders is just wrong.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.