General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

raleigh marathon CANCELLED

Started by M.J. · · Last activity · 7 posts · 918 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 January 2004
Last activity
27 January 2004
Original author
M.J.
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
918
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. god they suck. first year delayed a week (due to snow, there was no snow), second year on time,
    third year on time, this year (which i hope is the last), cancelled.

    raleighmarathon.comraleighmarathon.com

    m

    when man tries to imagine paradise on earth, the immediate result is a very respectable hell.
    claudel - 1929

  2. M.J. (prophet) said:

    god they suck. first year delayed a week (due to snow, there was no snow), second year on time,
    third year on time, this year (which i hope is the last), cancelled.

    raleighmarathon.comraleighmarathon.com

    Don't forget that it was only 25+ miles one year due to measurement error.

    GT

  3. Glenn Tanner said:
    M.J. (prophet) said:

    god they suck. first year delayed a week (due to snow, there was no snow), second year on time,
    third year on time, this year (which i hope is the last), cancelled.

    raleighmarathon.comraleighmarathon.com

    Don't forget that it was only 25+ miles one year due to measurement error.

    Whoops, or something like that:

    buffalorunners.comnews%5C0112 raleigh.htm

  4. "Glenn Tanner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Glenn Tanner said:
    M.J. (prophet) said:

    god they suck. first year delayed a week (due to snow, there was no snow), second year on time,
    third year on time, this year (which i hope is the last), cancelled.

    raleighmarathon.comraleighmarathon.com

    Don't forget that it was only 25+ miles one year due to measurement


    error.

    Quoted message said:


    Whoops, or something like that:

    buffalorunners.comnews%5C0112 raleigh.htm

    I think it's unfair to say "god they suck." The Raleigh Marathon has had more than its fair share of
    rotten luck. I feel very badly for Butch Robertson, the race director, who does a fabulous job on a
    lot of other local races. The core issues are 1) the weather in NC in December is very iffy and 2)
    local authorities, for whatever reason, cannot fathom the value of a local marathon, and so they
    provide less than stellar support for it.

    Butch had to cancel the first year because the Raleigh P.D. told him flatly they were pulling
    support because of a snowstorm, even though the storm hadn't occurred yet. The second year, these
    same men in blue misdirected the front of the pack off the course, resulting in a less than 26.2
    finish. Luckily for those attempting to qualify for Boston, the BAA accepted adjusted times. And
    then in 2002, one of the worst ice storms on record had runners tip-toeing over black ice and
    running around utility trucks attempting to fix downed power lines.

    I hope that Butch finds a title sponsor and that we can start up anew in 2005.

    -- Michael Harvey

  5. "Michael Harvey" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    "Glenn Tanner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Glenn Tanner said:

    M.J. (prophet) wrote:

    > god they suck. first year delayed a week (due to snow, there was no snow), second year on
    > time, third year on time, this year (which i hope is the last), cancelled.
    >
    > raleighmarathon.comraleighmarathon.com

    Don't forget that it was only 25+ miles one year due to measurement


    error.

    Quoted message said:


    Whoops, or something like that:

    buffalorunners.comnews%5C0112 raleigh.htm

    I think it's unfair to say "god they suck." The Raleigh Marathon has had more than its fair share
    of rotten luck. I feel very badly for Butch Robertson, the race director, who does a fabulous job
    on a lot of other local races. The core issues are 1) the weather in NC in December is very iffy
    and 2) local authorities, for whatever reason, cannot fathom the value of a local marathon, and so
    they provide less than stellar support for it.

    Butch had to cancel the first year because the Raleigh P.D. told him flatly they were pulling
    support because of a snowstorm, even though the storm hadn't occurred yet. The second year, these
    same men in blue misdirected the front of the pack off the course, resulting in a less than 26.2
    finish. Luckily for those attempting to qualify for Boston, the BAA accepted adjusted times. And
    then in 2002, one of the worst ice storms on record had runners tip-toeing over black ice and
    running around utility trucks attempting to fix downed power lines.

    I hope that Butch finds a title sponsor and that we can start up anew in 2005.

    If they moved the marathon date to March or October, they wouldn't have these weather issues. Is
    there a reason why they chose January?

    -Phil

  6. That's what happens when you hold a marathon in a state where no one is able to count to 26.

  7. "Phil M." <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Michael Harvey" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:


    "Glenn Tanner" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Glenn Tanner wrote:

    > M.J. (prophet) wrote:
    >
    >> god they suck. first year delayed a week (due to snow, there was no snow), second year on
    >> time, third year on time, this year (which i hope is the last), cancelled.
    >>
    >> raleighmarathon.comraleighmarathon.com
    >
    >
    > Don't forget that it was only 25+ miles one year due to measurement


    error.

    Quoted message said:


    Whoops, or something like that:

    buffalorunners.comnews%5C0112 raleigh.htm

    I think it's unfair to say "god they suck." The Raleigh Marathon has had more than its fair
    share of rotten luck. I feel very badly for Butch Robertson, the race director, who does a
    fabulous job on a lot of other local races. The core issues are 1) the weather in NC in December
    is very iffy and 2) local authorities, for whatever reason, cannot fathom the value of a local
    marathon, and so they provide less than stellar support for it.

    Butch had to cancel the first year because the Raleigh P.D. told him flatly they were pulling
    support because of a snowstorm, even though the storm hadn't occurred yet. The second year,
    these same men in blue misdirected the front of the pack off the course, resulting in a less
    than 26.2 finish. Luckily for those attempting to qualify for Boston, the BAA accepted adjusted
    times. And then in 2002, one of the worst ice storms on record had runners tip-toeing over black
    ice and running around utility trucks attempting to fix downed power lines.

    I hope that Butch finds a title sponsor and that we can start up anew in 2005.

    If they moved the marathon date to March or October, they wouldn't have these weather issues. Is
    there a reason why they chose January?

    -Phil

    You may be right about October, but March can be problematic as well. It's my understanding that
    they chose early December to fit into the existing, tight, national marathon schedule.

    -- Michael

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.