Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Raleigh Dyna-tech

Started by David Belbin · · Last activity · 7 posts · 7,235 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
22 March 2003
Last activity
17 August 2003
Original author
David Belbin
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
7,235
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have just bought a second hand Raleigh Dyna-tech 701. Is there anywhere on the web that I could
    find the frame spec for this bike? Does anyone know if there was a technical reason why Raleigh
    stopped producing the bonded frame design?

    --
    Regards David.

  2. It could be because of too frequent failures.

    A friend of mine has 3 of them crack. Mind you he is a big mileage cyclist but not heavy. About 12
    stone. He had three fail and eventually they replaced the last failure with a non-bonded frame. I
    don't know how he's got on with that.

  3. Quoted message said:

    It could be because of too frequent failures.<


    That's what I didn't want to hear!! Has anyone got one which has not cracked? When did Raleigh go
    back to steel? Any info., including frame spec of a 701, would be appreciated. David.

    "Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It could be because of too frequent failures.

    A friend of mine has 3 of them crack. Mind you he is a big mileage cyclist but not heavy. About 12
    stone. He had three fail and eventually they replaced the last failure with a non-bonded frame. I
    don't know how he's


    got

    Quoted message said:

    on with that.

  4. Hey, kinda off topic but I went to the Science Museam in London (the one with all the airplanes and
    the London Eye Capsul in the big exibition hall and if you go upstairs into the MATERIALs section,
    where they have all the Titanium stuff, they have a Dyna-tech on display as one of the first
    mainstream applications of Ti. I think skis were next to it. Also had a little blurb about Raeligh
    Special Products on the card.

    Anyway, it was cool to look at...

    -j

    "David Belbin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It could be because of too frequent failures.<


    That's what I didn't want to hear!! Has anyone got one which has not cracked? When did Raleigh go
    back to steel? Any info., including frame spec of a 701, would be appreciated. David.

    "Gearóid Ó Laoi, Garry Lee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    It could be because of too frequent failures.

    A friend of mine has 3 of them crack. Mind you he is a big mileage


    cyclist

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    but not heavy. About 12 stone. He had three fail and eventually they replaced the last failure
    with a non-bonded frame. I don't know how he's


    got

    Quoted message said:

    on with that.


  5. David Belbin said:

    I have just bought a second hand Raleigh Dyna-tech 701. Is there anywhere on the web that I could
    find the frame spec for this bike? Does anyone know if there was a technical reason why Raleigh
    stopped producing the bonded frame design?

    I have one of the low-end Dyna-techs in the shed. I think the 701 was in effect 531 or even 753,
    though Raleigh had Reynolds make special tubing for the Dyna-techs.

    I think they vanished for the same reason most mass-maunfacturers abandoned steel in the mid-late
    90s: fashion. Aluminium looks chunky and sells. Steel doesn't.

    Hey... David Belbin... Queens', 1984- ... canoe fiend?

    --
    John Stevenson [email hidden]

  6. Quoted message said:

    Hey... David Belbin... Queens', 1984- ... canoe fiend?<


    Not me, but I believe he represented GB, a few years ago. Regards David.

    "John Stevenson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    David Belbin said:

    I have just bought a second hand Raleigh Dyna-tech 701. Is there anywhere on the web that I
    could find the frame spec for this


    bike?

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone know if there was a technical reason why Raleigh stopped producing the bonded frame
    design?

    I have one of the low-end Dyna-techs in the shed. I think the 701 was in effect 531 or even 753,
    though Raleigh had Reynolds make special tubing for the Dyna-techs.

    I think they vanished for the same reason most mass-maunfacturers abandoned steel in the mid-late
    90s: fashion. Aluminium looks chunky and sells. Steel doesn't.

    Hey... David Belbin... Queens', 1984- ... canoe fiend?

    --
    John Stevenson [email hidden]

  7. Hello guys:

    Reynolds WERE NOT involved with the Raleigh Dyna-tech frameset . All the material was purchased direct from IMI in the UK by Raleigh. In the case of Titanium it was grade CP2

    Hope this help.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.