Professional Cycling · Public discussion
Raid on Quick Step!!!!!!!
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Professional Cycling
- Published
- 7 June 2007
- Last activity
- 8 June 2007
- Original author
- Moller
- Posts
- 39
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 4,726
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Moller said:
Het Laatste Nieuws claimed that a doping culture was allowed to flourish because the team had a mole at the International Cycling Union (UCI) who tipped them off when tests were due to be carried out.:eek: -
Moller said:
Het Laatste Nieuws claimed that a doping culture was allowed to flourish because the team had a mole at the International Cycling Union (UCI) who tipped them off when tests were due to be carried out.:eek:
[font=Verdana]What like when you win a race and you are going to get tested ? What tipping off ? Or do you mean the out of competition tests.....? hot water me thinks….[/font][font=Verdana][/font] -
whiteboytrash said:
[font=Verdana]What like when you win a race and you are going to get tested ? What tipping off ? Or do you mean the out of competition tests.....? hot water me thinks….[/font]
That's what the unnamed QS rider said in the press reports that Lefevre threatened to sue about in the Spring - does this explain why the team had (at least by their standards) a pretty poor classics campaign?
-
Rolfrae said:
That's what the unnamed QS rider said in the press reports that Lefevre threatened to sue about in the Spring - does this explain why the team had (at least by their standards) a pretty poor classics campaign?
So when QuickStep get thrown out for systematic doping Hincapie will be the winner of all classics for the last 5 years ! legend....... :p
-
whiteboytrash said:
So when QuickStep get thrown out for systematic doping Hincapie will be the winner of all classics for the last 5 years ! legend....... :p
News in, Hincapie was going to UCI HQ to collect his prize money when he fell into a ditch. He should be back again for the 2008 classics campaign when he fully intends to fall into another ditch at the first available opportunity.
-
Rolfrae said:
News in, Hincapie was going to UCI HQ to collect his prize money when he fell into a ditch. He should be back again for the 2008 classics campaign when he fully intends to fall into another ditch at the first available opportunity.
Its the way he falls into ditches he does it with such panache..... but he's a nice bloke so its ok if he falls into ditches....
-
whiteboytrash said:
[font=Verdana]What like when you win a race and you are going to get tested ? What tipping off ? Or do you mean the out of competition tests.....? hot water me thinks….[/font]
That was in one of the other news reports, I presume its the same as Manzano was saying about someone in a lab tipping of Kelme and USPS when the 'vampires' were going to call. -
whiteboytrash said:
Its the way he falls into ditches he does it with such panache..... but he's a nice bloke so its ok if he falls into ditches....
Nice bloke? How do you know? He's part of the infamous doped to the gills US Postal cavalry charge that ruined the Tour for all of us (apart from House) for 7 years in a row. Should have stayed in the ditch....anyway, wasn't this thread supposed to be about Quikstep?😄
-
Rolfrae said:
Nice bloke? How do you know? He's part of the infamous doped to the gills US Postal cavalry charge that ruined the Tour for all of us (apart from House) for 7 years in a row. Should have stayed in the ditch....anyway, wasn't this thread supposed to be about Quikstep?😄
I wonder this mean they won't be let into the tour? -
Moller said:
I wonder this mean they won't be let into the tour?
Only the riders directly involved (those found in possession) would be likely to be blocked from starting. I mean, if Valv(Piti) can start the Tour then how can they bar anyone else from starting?
-
Rolfrae said:
Only the riders directly involved (those found in possession) would be likely to be blocked from starting. I mean, if Valv(Piti) can start the Tour then how can they bar anyone else from starting?
Tous dope. Don't let any of them start.
-
wicklow200 said:
Tous dope. Don't let any of them start.
Surely Wiggins can start? He might have a change at the prologue if he's the only one riding?
-
Rolfrae said:
News in, Hincapie was going to UCI HQ to collect his prize money when he fell into a ditch. He should be back again for the 2008 classics campaign when he fully intends to fall into another ditch at the first available opportunity.
So you guys make fun of Hincapie for not winning even though he has been very close a number of times, and you gripe about the winners being dopers. The evidence seems to point in the direction that Hincapie is a "clean" racer. Someone that has been so close so many times with a little "help" surely would have won one. Choose one side of the argument please.
-
IndyRider said:
So you guys make fun of Hincapie for not winning even though he has been very close a number of times, and you gripe about the winners being dopers. The evidence seems to point in the direction that Hincapie is a "clean" racer. Someone that has been so close so many times with a little "help" surely would have won one. Choose one side of the argument please.
Okay. Dode Hincapie is a doper. He was the only one to ride in all L.A.'s seven Tour winning teams, ergo he is a doper. Happy now?
-
Does Bettini live in Belgium? What would be the status of his World's if he was guilty? Would they award it the 2nd place?
I am going to jump ahead here about 35 posts to this thread.........Because if Boonen is one of the guilty, the spin will be "It was Lances fault!" "He was a Postie"
I'm starting to get the feeling that there are people in cycling who don't care that the sport is being torn down. I'm curious as if there will be any less interest in this years TDF if some main riders in QS go down.
-
wolfix said:
Does Bettini live in Belgium? What would be the status of his World's if he was guilty? Would they award it the 2nd place?
The 2nd place being...... Zabel. Oh, [censored], he just admitted to doping. Sooo, lets go for third place. Valverde. Nope, that just doesn't seem right, awarding the race to Valv(Piti). Starting to get a bit complicated now. Sanchez? No idea if he's clean. So let's just say Robbie McEwen is the world champion shall we?Once again though it's the police doing all the work, seems their the best hope for cleaning up cycling.
-
IndyRider said:
Someone that has been so close so many times with a little "help" surely would have won one.
Unless of course, he needed dope to be so close. -
I'm starting to think that people involved in cycling and the riders are not that smart. With the enviroment that is out there today with doping, does it make sense to store the stuff in your home?
-
wolfix said:
Does Bettini live in Belgium? What would be the status of his World's if he was guilty? Would they award it the 2nd place?
I am going to jump ahead here about 35 posts to this thread.........Because if Boonen is one of the guilty, the spin will be "It was Lances fault!" "He was a Postie"
I'm starting to get the feeling that there are people in cycling who don't care that the sport is being torn down. I'm curious as if there will be any less interest in this years TDF if some main riders in QS go down.
A lot of people in belgium supported Godefroots press conference and said D'Hont should shut the [censored] up... (these were not my words..).Anyway some news about the raid:
cyclingheroes.infoid648.htmlOpen ↗
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.