Road Cycling · Public discussion

RAGT Prize Money

Started by K. J. Papai · · Last activity · 11 posts · 393 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
19 July 2004
Last activity
20 July 2004
Original author
K. J. Papai
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
393
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Your collective help is kindly appreciated, in Cyclingnews.com it is
    reported that the team with the least prize money is:

    RAGT Semences-MG Rover - €3,764

    How did RAGT earn that $4,000?

    The top 5 earners are

    Cofidis - €48,833
    Team CSC - €44,427
    Fassa Bortolo - €44,091
    Quick.Step-Davitamon - €39,481
    US Postal Service-Berry Floor - €39,334

    -Ken

  2. "K. J. Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Your collective help is kindly appreciated, in Cyclingnews.com it is
    reported that the team with the least prize money is:

    RAGT Semences-MG Rover - ?3,764

    How did RAGT earn that $4,000?

    What the hell are they doing in the tour? Yeah, they're french. Even the old
    Big Mat team was better. There are so many other teams that could have
    participated, but they aren't french. These guys are just riding around
    france for three weeks.

  3. Marlene Blanshay said:

    "K. J. Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Your collective help is kindly appreciated, in Cyclingnews.com it is
    reported that the team with the least prize money is:

    RAGT Semences-MG Rover - ?3,764

    How did RAGT earn that $4,000?

    What the hell are they doing in the tour? Yeah, they're french. Even the old
    Big Mat team was better. There are so many other teams that could have
    participated, but they aren't french. These guys are just riding around
    france for three weeks.

    Good question....
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road.php?id=road/rankings/2004/teams

    Rankings as of June 27, 2004

    Men's Division I

    1 Team CSC 5012.00 pts
    2 Saeco 4711.00
    3 T-Mobile Team 4707.00
    4 Gerolsteiner 4515.75
    5 Phonak Hearing Systems 4330.00
    6 Rabobank 4230.00
    7 Fassa Bortolo 4051.00
    8 Quick.Step-Davitamon 4005.00
    9 Euskaltel-Euskadi 3880.25
    10 Saunier Duval-Prodir 3700.00
    11 US Postal Service p/b Berry Floor 3446.00
    12 Illes Balears-Banesto 3127.50
    13 Lotto-Domo 3053.00
    14 Cofidis, le credit par Telephone 2812.00
    15 FDJeux.com 2798.00
    16 Liberty Seguros 2565.25
    17 Alessio-Bianchi 2558.00
    18 Brioches La Boulangere 2396.00
    19 Ag2R Prevoyance 2306.00
    20 Landbouwkrediet-Colnago 2196.00
    21 Vini Caldirola-Nobili Rubinetterie 2190.00
    22 Credit Agricole 2072.00
    23 Lampre 2014.50
    24 MrBookmaker.com-Palmans 1908.00
    25 Relax-Bodysol 1765.50
    26 De Nardi 1416.00
    27 Chocolade Jacques Wincor-Nixdorf 1343.00
    28 Milaneza Maia 973.00
    29 Bankgiroloterij 689.00
    30 R.A.G.T. Semences-MG Rover 295.00

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Marlene Blanshay said:


    "K. J. Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Your collective help is kindly appreciated, in Cyclingnews.com it is
    reported that the team with the least prize money is:

    RAGT Semences-MG Rover - ?3,764

    How did RAGT earn that $4,000?

    What the hell are they doing in the tour? Yeah, they're french. Even the old
    Big Mat team was better. There are so many other teams that could have
    participated, but they aren't french. These guys are just riding around
    france for three weeks.

    I agree that it's embarassing that this team is doing the Tour. They're
    in because

    1) they are french
    2) their team (as Delatour) won a stage last year, never mind that the
    guy who won that stage is not with them anymore.
    3) people like Legeay will say that the Giro is full of mediocre
    Italian teams, and the Vuelta full of mediocre Spanish teams, so
    whhy not have mediocre French teams in the TdF as well. Of course,
    it's true, but that's because the better teams did not ask to
    participate to the Giro and Vuelta. Not so in the TdF

    Furthermore, the excuse that has often been used in the past to justify
    inviting weaker French, that they build the future of the French
    peloton, cannot be used for RAGT, who are mostly a bunch of old pros.
    The "build the future" excuse was used repeatedly for the
    Bonjour/Brioches team, and I think it has worked out well. RAGT, on the
    other hand, is hopeless. Their only objective is to get as many riders
    back to Paris as possible.

    jyh.

    --
    =====================================================================
    jean-yves herve' /\
    Department of Computer Science \/ e-mail --> [email hidden]
    and Statistics /\
    University of Rhode Island \/ Tel. --> (401) 874-4400
    Kingston, RI 02881-0816 /\ Fax. --> (401) 874-4617
    USA \/
    =====================================================================

  5. "Marlene Blanshay" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "K. J. Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Your collective help is kindly appreciated, in Cyclingnews.com it is
    reported that the team with the least prize money is:

    RAGT Semences-MG Rover - ?3,764

    How did RAGT earn that $4,000?

    What the hell are they doing in the tour? Yeah, they're french. Even the


    old

    Quoted message said:

    Big Mat team was better. There are so many other teams that could have
    participated, but they aren't french. These guys are just riding around
    france for three weeks.

    The Navigators or Health Net would kick RAGT's ass.

    Quoted message said:


  6. On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:17:07 GMT, "Ken Papai" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Navigators or Health Net would kick RAGT's ass.

    I have no doubt of that in rolling terrain in one day races -- and
    especailly if either team was racing to win. I'm not so sure about
    that in a race like the Tour where all three teams would be
    outclassed.

    JT

  7. "John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:17:07 GMT, "Ken Papai" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Navigators or Health Net would kick RAGT's ass.

    I have no doubt of that in rolling terrain in one day races -- and
    especailly if either team was racing to win. I'm not so sure about
    that in a race like the Tour where all three teams would be
    outclassed.

    JT

    Health Net's big international competition this year was the Tour of
    Langkawi. Despite the fact that the race was in January, so it isn't the
    most accurate indicator of mid season fitness or team coordination, the most
    noteworthy teams were Lampre, Chocolade Jacques, Mr. Bookmaker/Collstrop,
    Ceramiche Panaria, Relax-Bodysol, and Formaggi Pinzolo. None of these teams
    are entered in the TdF. In the two stages that ended on mountaintop
    finishes, Health Net's best two riders were Lieswyn and Pate. On stage 2, L
    finished 25th, 2:52 down, P finished 50th, 6:03 down. On stage 9, L finished
    30th 6:44 down, P finished 63rd, 13:19 down. On stage 3 which had a big
    climb toward the end (finishing with a descent and flat run-in), the field
    broke into small groups. Fraser won the bunch sprint for 2nd.

    As far as the Tour goes, if Health Net wasn't an American team, they would
    get about as much consideration as Barloworld.

  8. John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:17:07 GMT, "Ken Papai" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Navigators or Health Net would kick RAGT's ass.

    I have no doubt of that in rolling terrain in one day races -- and
    especailly if either team was racing to win. I'm not so sure about
    that in a race like the Tour where all three teams would be
    outclassed.

    It isn't at all clear to me that Healthnet would be all that
    outclassed by the majority of teams in the Tour. I think that they
    could put in at least as good a Tour as Euskatel has put in so far.

  9. jean-yves hervé said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    "Marlene Blanshay" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    "K. J. Papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Your collective help is kindly appreciated, in Cyclingnews.com it is
    reported that the team with the least prize money is:

    RAGT Semences-MG Rover - ?3,764

    How did RAGT earn that $4,000?

    What the hell are they doing in the tour? Yeah, they're french. Even the old
    Big Mat team was better. There are so many other teams that could have
    participated, but they aren't french. These guys are just riding around
    france for three weeks.

    Quoted message said:

    I agree that it's embarassing that this team is doing the Tour. They're
    in because

    Quoted message said:

    1) they are french
    2) their team (as Delatour) won a stage last year, never mind that the
    guy who won that stage is not with them anymore.
    3) people like Legeay will say that the Giro is full of mediocre
    Italian teams, and the Vuelta full of mediocre Spanish teams, so
    whhy not have mediocre French teams in the TdF as well. Of course,
    it's true, but that's because the better teams did not ask to
    participate to the Giro and Vuelta. Not so in the TdF

    Quoted message said:

    Furthermore, the excuse that has often been used in the past to justify
    inviting weaker French, that they build the future of the French
    peloton, cannot be used for RAGT, who are mostly a bunch of old pros.
    The "build the future" excuse was used repeatedly for the
    Bonjour/Brioches team, and I think it has worked out well. RAGT, on the
    other hand, is hopeless. Their only objective is to get as many riders
    back to Paris as possible.

    See my other post. They need accolades!

    Quoted message said:

    jyh.

    Quoted message said:

    --
    =====================================================================
    jean-yves herve' /\
    Department of Computer Science \/ e-mail --> [email hidden]
    and Statistics /\
    University of Rhode Island \/ Tel. --> (401) 874-4400
    Kingston, RI 02881-0816 /\ Fax. --> (401) 874-4617
    USA \/
    =====================================================================

  10. John Forrest Tomlinson <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:17:07 GMT, "Ken Papai" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    The Navigators or Health Net would kick RAGT's ass.

    I have no doubt of that in rolling terrain in one day races -- and
    especailly if either team was racing to win. I'm not so sure about
    that in a race like the Tour where all three teams would be
    outclassed.

    JT

    Often forgotten is that the Tour de France is by invitation, not UCI
    points or best in country. Pro Tour may change that, or not. Until
    the present this has been something the race organizers have used to
    promote national cycling. If the UCI dictates who can and can't race
    in it then it loses some amount of french 'ownership'.

  11. Quoted message said:

    As far as the Tour goes, if Health Net wasn't an American team, they would
    get about as much consideration as Barloworld...


    Another team that is better than RAGT.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.