RAFL - Fred - Feb 4th

that is just too good, did you have a woman think it up for you, Lee
Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

And you're wanting to see if she'll beg?

I'm thinking Jimmy the Greek should be informed. Too bad I'm not a gamblin' sort. HA!

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Prairie Roots
232/163.6/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

Ooooh, you're bad! Or maybe you're good..... I guess we'll find out!

Brenda

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

YES, so Where are They??????

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may make
sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

as well as the rest of the group. <G> I see you once again are teasing and playing games with us. I
told ya .... PLAY NICE!

Joyce

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Well. well! Enjoy the bottom Fred. As it is with men, they don't get to
assume that position often! hehe!
Congratulations.
Sorry to anyone I offend with my colorful imagination!!!
Bird
need to lose 45#
"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

No. I don't need no "stickin womin" to think things up for me! (G)

I thought about it last week since on other weeks she has been right on it - pacing the floor, er,
computer keyboard, just waiting to take the lead. Or maybe keep the lead. Or, perhaps, this week,
lose the lead. Bottom, top or just inbetween! (G)

Miss Violette said:

that is just too good, did you have a woman think it up for you, Lee Fred
<[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

No, I figure that I just should not have posted because I imagine "sweet southern bell" will hold
out till hell freezes over. (g)

Of course, Nurse Ratched, might throttle me with intravenous tubing. A lobotomy at this point would
have little impact.

Prairie Roots said:

And you're wanting to see if she'll beg?

I'm thinking Jimmy the Greek should be informed. Too bad I'm not a gamblin' sort. HA!

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Prairie Roots
232/163.6/WW goal 145 joined WW Online 22-Feb-2003

ROTFLMAO

"Miss Violette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message -"]news:[email hidden]-
berlin.de...

Quoted message said:

that is just too good, did you have a woman think it up for you, Lee Fred
<[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

If you say "pretty please."

Okay, coming right UP, er, down, ahem.....

Lesanne said:

YES, so Where are They??????

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

excellent, Lee
Fred <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may
make sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Holy Cow, you Shrank like Bluejeans in the Dryer after Thanksgiving dinner....

You got the bottom this week babe for sure. I am hanging around 159.5 most of this week. So I will
be up another on my average most likely. I feel so bad I don't even care.

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may
make sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Welllll, it's about time you gave up the info! <G> Good for you, congrats on the wonderful loss. I
can imagine how thrilled you must have been with the results. Is this now an alltime low for you?

I really do think that heavy, humid air can play havoc with scale results. I remember going through
the same thing in the summer, living with the chicago humidity blues. <sigh>

Once again, congrats Fred .. and may this week be as kind and exciting!

Joyce

Fred said:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may make
sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Great whoosh Fred. Guess you were good after all!

Brenda

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may
make sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000603030801070500060709
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Weigh to go, Fred. Congratulations on getting off that gain from last week, plus a nice additional
bit. Elaine K

Fred said:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may make
sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

--------------000603030801070500060709 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-
Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-
Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"> <title></title> </head> <body text="#000000"
bgcolor="#ffffff"> Weigh to go, Fred. Congratulations on getting off that gain from last week, plus
a nice additional bit.<br> Elaine K<br> <br> Fred wrote:<br> <blockquote type="cite"
cite="[email hidden]"> <pre wrap="">I was shocked but it is
explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may make sense but then again.
But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:39 -0800, Fred <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href=""][email hidden]"><[email hidden]></a> wrote:

</pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for
the results

.............. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>

--------------000603030801070500060709--

WOW! Good job, now I want the same :-)
--
Nathalie from Belgium
134.1/101.4/minigoal 99.9 Goal 68 Kg
134.1/101.5/minigoal 220.3/Goal 150 pounds RAFL 105.3/101.4/96 Kg
134/1.102/212 lbs "Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may
make sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

hey hey - no upward trend in the Fred household then! hurrah 🙂

though you're still a terrible tease I see........... (don't deny it - you're guilty as
charged!) *grin*

--
krys

UK 157/132/126 Started March 1st 2001 GOAL August 16th 2001 ...definitely making progress...

"Fred" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may
make sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............

Congrats on the BIG loss Fred!!

COnnie

--

Cheers,

Connie Walsh

241.5/205/155 RAFL 210.5/205/198.5

Fred said:

I was shocked but it is explainable. I still don't believe last week's results so this one may
make sense but then again. But without further ado or maybe just a bit....

(Farefare for the Common Man or in this case the Thin Man - Nora, the envelope, please)

DOWN 3.4 (seriously, I was shocked) Current: 156.8

I think it makes sense as the result of last week's 2.2 gain which seemed too high and so that
anomaly explains this bigger loss. I think they are both accurate but that last week was inflated
by water or salt or heavy air. I don't think I was that much better this week and over-celebrated
last night.

May others, including 'she who will remain nameless', have similar results.

Fred
219.2/156.8/164. (Lifetime July 2003) Started WW: Oct 29, 2002

Fred said:

Well, I weighed in and I know Lesanne is waiting for the results

..............